AlmasterGM wrote:Scum:
AurorusVox
quadz08
'kay.
AlmasterGM wrote:AGar
Shadow Dancer
That just seems a little too gambitty for me to believe.
AlmasterGM wrote:SD wrote:If you use your super without claiming the targetand we lynch you it still sounds like a nice tradeoff.
SD wrote:Have you used your Super already, Alma.(Not only in case we lynchyou but also because if you are telling the truth you are a likely NK and for tripple protection to work it should not matter when you use it, which means you should use it now).
SD wrote:Great news: AGM's claim just became quite a lot more believable recently.strongly advocate against an AGM-lynch today.
Explain.
Shadow Dancer wrote:lynch2 Dekes
ooba wrote:*facepalm*
Stop pushing SD folks ..
Lynch 2 VC
Quadz (6)– ooba, Dekes, Gemini, MoI, LC, AGM
LordChronos (2) – Chesskid
AGM (5) – AGar, Quadz, ShadowDancer, Gandalf, Chronopie
Gandalf (2) – Mothrax, AGM,
Iecerint (1) - AV
Not voting (2) – Iecerint, Axelrod
With Axel's prob vote, Quadz its time for you to claim
edit: I'm not claiming at L-1 of the lynch - There's just something I need to do after we are sure on who we're lynching but before the actual lynch goes through!
chesskid3 wrote:ooba wrote:*facepalm*
Stop pushing SD folks ..
Lynch 2 VC
Quadz (6)– ooba, Dekes, Gemini, MoI, LC, AGM
LordChronos (2) – Chesskid
AGM (5) – AGar, Quadz, ShadowDancer, Gandalf, Chronopie
Gandalf (2) – Mothrax, AGM,
Iecerint (1) - AV
Not voting (2) – Iecerint, Axelrod
With Axel's prob vote, Quadz its time for you to claim
edit: I'm not claiming at L-1 of the lynch - There's just something I need to do after we are sure on who we're lynching but before the actual lynch goes through!
YEAAAAAAAA IM A DOUBLE VOTER WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Iecerint wrote:Dekes, have you made comments about gandalf somewhere, other than to deny having been roleblocked?
mothrax wrote:Seriously, the first 15 posts are filled with speculation about claims, dead sections, and buddying to other players. Then there is some gandalfbrand content that is almost always scummy anyways. Then you go back to the fluff anf then, oh look, more setup speculation.
Lynch2: Gandalf
quadz08 wrote:I think that AGM using his supposed ability before his lynch is a good idea. I also agree that it should be solely AGM's decision.
AlmasterGM wrote:Scum:
AGar
Shadow Dancer
MoI wrote:You somehow don’t think Iec is a target regardless of whether AGM dies today?
And leaving AGM-Town alive means Iec lives to fight for at least 1 more day. Who knows, perhaps he will be able to do something useful down the line that doesn’t involve his regular Power.
I also agree with the assessment that Quadz calling AGM 3rd Party and not scum is suspect.
Dekes wrote:
Basically translates into "I believe AGM's doc claim but let's lynch him anway." Coincidence that you're the second biggest wagon?
Shadow Dancer wrote:Great news: AGM's claim just became quite a lot more believable recently. I strongly advocate against an AGM-lynch today.
Shadow Dancer wrote:AV's flip will certainly help us decide on the question of mafia's mythological link.
Dekes wrote:Gemini input
Quadz wrote:In case you haven't noticed, the cop result on AGM gave us a 3rd party result. They aren't scumbuddies.
AlmasterGM wrote:AGar wrote:I didn't take note of that.
Hm.
I'm really not big on Quadz as Lynch2, but I'll get behind it if that's the popular vote.
Gimme a day to re-read this whole mess. I feel like I'm missing big pieces here to the puzzle. I'll be back with a more appropriate Lynch2 candidate in the next 24 hours.
This post is scummy. Both the agreement to just do whatever popular opinion dictates part AND the quickness with which you read and dismissed my claim as :MOONBEAMS:, but then came back to it in a new light the minute someone else prompted you to part.