Chuck Season 1 - GAME OVER

[ChannelDelibird]

Even more on topic:



I really shouldn't be encouraging this kind of spam and digression, but dammit, I can't help it when it comes to this woman.

----------------

Anyway.

Ragna - doesn't his suspicion of RC sound serious to you?

[ChannelDelibird]

EBWOP: Yes. Strahovski at the top of the page was a good idea.

[Ragnarokio]

this game is just filled to the brim with cool people.

@Peregrine: Any reason in particular you don't find anyone suspicious?

[ChannelDelibird]

I know there was a pretty picture, but I did ask you a question.

[Ragnarokio]

No, It doesn't, At most theres one serious point in there, and saturating one point on somebody with layers and layers of jokes isn't a great thing to do if you're expressing serious suspicion.

[ReaperCharlie]

EBWOP: Yes. Strahovski at the top of the page was a good idea.

I concur, good sir. That was 100% :goodposting:!

You have earned your way onto my NOT FOR LYNCHIN list, until at

least

Day 3.

Now I have to gooooo download that show. Ahem.

[mikeburnfire]

Perhaps if you guys didn't spam up the topic so much, it would be worth MoS's time.

[ReaperCharlie]

[insert snarky comment here]

[danakillsu]

That's a good point. Please stop encouraging lurking with your relentless spam.
Understandably, those of you that have just started watching the show are spending a lot of your time drooling over Yvonne.
The rest of us, though, would like to get on to the game, so please let us do so.
Everyone please make a concerted effort to stop posting one-liners and get some content out there.
Luckily, we can get some reads on some players who have been attempting to play this game, but making it so we can't read you is fairly scummy as well.

Your friend, danakillsu
/endrant

[ReaperCharlie]

OK GUYZ GREAT PLAN.

LETS ALL

START

LURKING UNTIL MOS

STOPS

.

K READY? GO

[Ragnarokio]

@

Dana:

Thor begins the bout between himself and MarchHare when he asks why MarchHare hadn't bandwagonned onto MBF with the rest of us (He was either at L-2 or L-3 at the time)

MarchHare calls it a bad wagon, and thor pushes for more information. MarchHare and him have a small back-and-forth where thor tries to figure out why MarchHare doesn't find MBF scummy, but a lot of talking and not much information is gained. MarchHare has a gut-based town read on MBF.

Thor says that deeper scumhunting occurs later in the game, and MarchHare says that deep scumhunting can happen at the beginning of the game. MarchHare is advocating the ooba wagon though not as loudly as thor is advocating the MBF wagon.

You, at this point, vote MarchHare with the reasoning not really matching up with anything MarchHare has said. You say that MarchHare is trying to "make people think that we can't find scum on page x", seemingly indirectly quoting what thor said earlier. MarchHare was advocating an ooba lynch and explicitly said that deep scumhunting was possible on page 1 prior to this.

@ MarchHare
Just trying to put some pressure on someone with at least a little reasoning. I hate your repeated attempts to make us think we can't find scum on page x.
unvote vote: MarchHare

You later expanding on your vague vote and the reasoning seemed to change a lot with a new wording.

Your attempt to stop any cases from forming by defending players from the inevitably weak attacks made by others is much scummier. We can find scumtells this early in the game, and convincing ourselves that we can't hurts the town.

You still have an evident lack of knowledge on MarchHare's opinions, especially the "we can find scumtells this early in this game", since that's essentially echoing MarchHare's opinion, not contradicting it. Attempting to stop cases from forming is something vague and probably wrong. The only case MarchHare spent time refuting was the RVS wagon that put MBF to L-2, and that was when thor tried to push him into joining it. That's not exactly trying to stomp out any cases.

I caught on to the fact that you might have had a vital misreading, especially with you essentially attacking MarchHare for the "early scumhunting doesn't work thing", and tried to correct you.

Some time passes, and then after the thor wagon passes, you try and shake some of the straggler votes off him by calling him town. This is the guy that was taking the side of the debate that you were attacking MarchHare for (early scumhunting isn't possible), although to be fair, both of them were pretty zealous in their early attacks.

You then go on to continue your attack on MarchHare, by quoting all of his counterpoints to thor, where he is explaining that he does not want to hop on the L-2 RVS wagon that thor is pushing.

None of this adds up at all, you seem to be way more focused on attacking MarchHare than on the reasons you are attacking him for, and you're being a little defensive of thor as well. You two being buddies wouldn't surprise me very much.

Care to respond now?

[mothrax]

votecount 1.3

Morgan: Because tonight Chuck Bartowski is boldly going where none of us have gone before. To have intercourse with a beautiful woman.
Anna: Speak for yourself.

Thor665 (3): mikeburnfire, Ragnarokio, ooba
Mastermind of Sin (3): Energetic Penguin, Ant_to_the_max, ReaperCharlie
MarchHare (2): Mastermind of Sin, danakillsu
PerigrineV (1): ChannelDelibird
ReaperCharlie (2): MarchHare, PeregrineV
danakillsu (1): Thor665

Not Voting (1):animorpherv1

Notes:
Mastermind of Sin has been proddeda
With

13

alive, it takes

7

to lynch.
Sorry for the delay, Finals are almost over!
Deadline is Thursday May 12 at 11:59 PM (EST)

[MarchHare]

Dana, I tried to derail a weak wagon BECAUSE IT WAS A HORRIBLE FUCKING WAGON.

More votes on Reaper, please.

[MarchHare]

@Ragnarokio

, what is your read on dana as of right now?

[Ant_to_the_max]

Perhaps if you guys didn't spam up the topic so much, it would be worth MoS's time.

Why just bring up MoS here?

Although, pressure voting someone who isn't going to show up is not helping at all

UNVOTE:
VOTE: PerigrineV

ReaperCharlie called me names, ignored my posts, randomly posts 2 man scum teams, and in general does not bathe regularly. He would be a perfect lynch candidate, and people will love you if you vote for him.

I am pretty sure 2 of those 4 are unnecessary crap while the other two can be argued as crap reasons.

[Mastermind of Sin]

I'm gonna sit and watch for a while... *gets out popcorn*

[Mastermind of Sin]

D) What reason do we have to believe you that my WA™ 3000's broken?

WA 3000 = WAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA...

All I hear is you crying.

You may have been here longer than Ythan but you clearly haven't read much ReaperCharlie. That post looks fairly typical of him to me. (Not intended as a slight, RC.)

Spy high five!

In other news, you kids need to chill out. I go to sleep, and I wake up with a prod from the mod. What's up with that? Can't a guy take a nap without getting prodded these days? I wasn't gone for *that* long...

[mothrax]

Refer to the rules post. You were gone for 48 hours.

[danakillsu]

@ Ragnarokio
Your case is confusing to me. Granted you don't like my reasons for voting MarchHare. But when was thor saying that early scumhunting wasn't possible? How am I being defensive of thor in any way other than calling him a townread of mine?

[ooba]

- Post 260 makes a lot of sense
- However, Scum dana would have read an attack post properly before replying (268)
I hate fake day vigs. Thor, can you show me a game where you've fake dayvigg'd as Town?
Also, I'd put CDB and RC in the town category.

[MarchHare]

Dana, I love the way you never respond to my posts.
<3

[ReaperCharlie]

D) What reason do we have to believe you that my WA™ 3000's broken?

WA 3000 = WAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA...

All I hear is you crying.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Perhaps if you guys didn't spam up the topic so much, it would be worth MoS's time.

This.

[Ragnarokio]

@Ragnarokio

, what is your read on dana as of right now?

Mild suspicion, while noting that thor and dana are more likely scum if the other flips so.

@ Ragnarokio
Your case is confusing to me. Granted you don't like my reasons for voting MarchHare. But when was thor saying that early scumhunting wasn't possible? How am I being defensive of thor in any way other than calling him a townread of mine?

1) Thor and MarchHare specifically talked about early scumhunting as part of their exchange before. MarchHare was of the opinion that scumhunting was possible straight from the start of the game, He goes so far as to say he has pegged a lot of scum in the first five pages.

Thor takes the opposite side of the debate, saying that scumhunting has little value as far as catching scum goes until a little later into the game (late day 1, and day 2). He says that cases built before then are going to be weak, although clearly advocates early aggression.

2) You were against MarchHare during his argument with thor, when the reasons you were citing fit thor measurably better than MarchHare.

You said this:

I hate your repeated attempts to make us think we can't find scum on page x.

MarchHare said this:

Deep scum hunting comes on page one

You were basically attacking him for the opposite of something he said. This makes me think that you may have been attacking MarchHare because he was attacking thor, rather than anything MarchHare did. You ignored (or missed, I can't tell how much you're reading) my earlier post where I said:

Dana, MarchHare was advocating early scumtells, not denying them, your vote might better be placed on thor.

and the later post where i elaborated on that in more detail. You continuing the case on MarchHare, although maybe shifting the focus slightly (You only had three or so posts describing the case, and they all varied slightly), and spoke against the thor wagon. This makes me think you aren't too interested in what thor was doing, just in how you could attack MarchHare.

[danakillsu]

@Ragnarokio

, what is your read on dana as of right now?

Mild suspicion, while noting that thor and dana are more likely scum if the other flips so.

@ Ragnarokio
Your case is confusing to me. Granted you don't like my reasons for voting MarchHare. But when was thor saying that early scumhunting wasn't possible? How am I being defensive of thor in any way other than calling him a townread of mine?

1) Thor and MarchHare specifically talked about early scumhunting as part of their exchange before. MarchHare was of the opinion that scumhunting was possible straight from the start of the game, He goes so far as to say he has pegged a lot of scum in the first five pages.

Thor takes the opposite side of the debate, saying that scumhunting has little value as far as catching scum goes until a little later into the game (late day 1, and day 2). He says that cases built before then are going to be weak, although clearly advocates early aggression.

2) You were against MarchHare during his argument with thor, when the reasons you were citing fit thor measurably better than MarchHare.

You said this:

I hate your repeated attempts to make us think we can't find scum on page x.

MarchHare said this:

Deep scum hunting comes on page one

You were basically attacking him for the opposite of something he said. This makes me think that you may have been attacking MarchHare because he was attacking thor, rather than anything MarchHare did. You ignored (or missed, I can't tell how much you're reading) my earlier post where I said:

Dana, MarchHare was advocating early scumtells, not denying them, your vote might better be placed on thor.

and the later post where i elaborated on that in more detail. You continuing the case on MarchHare, although maybe shifting the focus slightly (You only had three or so posts describing the case, and they all varied slightly), and spoke against the thor wagon. This makes me think you aren't too interested in what thor was doing, just in how you could attack MarchHare.

First of all, stop saying I ignored what you said. Disagreeing =/= ignoring. I actually defended my logic against what you were saying about MarchHare. But more importantly, you are the one who seems to have no idea who was on what side in the thor vs. MarchHare argument. You just admitted that thor clearly advocated early aggression and you know that MarchHare was in the business of derailing wagons that were not horrible for the time they formed, yet you try to say that MarchHare was advocating early scumhunting and thor was not. That just makes no sense, and calling me scummy for believing the opposite of your very confused and confusing position is ridiculous.

@ MarchHare
If you're referring to me not responding to this:

Dana, I tried to derail a weak wagon BECAUSE IT WAS A HORRIBLE FUCKING WAGON.

More votes on Reaper, please.

then that's pretty sad. It's one line. You said you tried to derail it because it was horrible. Good for you, anyone would say the same. Saying it doesn't make it so.