Chuck Season 1 - GAME OVER

[MarchHare]

Bad wagon.

Please wax eloquent to me on why you are pushing it.

[Thor665]

Dodgy answer is dodgy.

I'm pushing it because thus far I have one town read, a handfull of 'I hate them because they're lurkers' reads, and the rest all stand equal. I want to lynch someone, thus I chose Mikey boy - call it gut and him not deigning to respond to the wagon to show how "cool, calm, and town he is." I say it's lurking out because he's scum.

Why are you against the wagon?

[MarchHare]

How the hell is "Bad wagon" a dodgy answer?

He's not scummy.

[Thor665]

Bad wagon is a dodgy answer because it reveals, wait, let me check my math...carry the one...oh, here it is - 0 reasons why it's "bad".

How is he "not scummy"?

Who is "more scummy"?

Weren't you supposed to be a superstar leading a lynch? How's that working out for you?

[MarchHare]

I see you are as mediocre and your ego is as inflated as the last time I had to put up with you for the duration of a game.

[Thor665]

No, actually it got bigger, I just hid it slightly better.

Still dodgy McDodging I see - questions too tough? Why is it a "bad" wagon? WHo is a better lynch and why? This is Mafia, not rocket science.

[MarchHare]

It's a bad wagon because he's not scummy.

The objective is to lynch scum. Therefore, lynching players who are not scummy is bad.

This is not a hard concept.

There's no particularly good lynch at this point in time. We are five fucking pages into the game, two of which are almost exclusively one-on-one interactions.

[MarchHare]

And apparently it is rocket science because you suck at it.

[Thor665]

If he's not scummy I suppose you'll agree he's not townish either. So going off random statistics I'm doing about as good as I can (check my math though, I'm not good at rocket science). Going even further, since I believe I have 1 town read theoretically I'm doing slightly better than random selection.

Also, if this is the way you want to play it than your Ooba vote is "bad" too - and you're not even trying to get people to vote it so you can find out if random chance favored you.

Deeper scumhunting comes Day 2 and maybe late Day 1. Prior to that we have wagons for reasons that are weak but still valid.

[MarchHare]

His first post gave town vibes, though nothing considerable.

It's not random; don't presume as much. I'll push it if/when I see fit. Now's not the time.

Deep scum hunting comes on page one; looking back on my games there have been several instances where I've pegged scum within the first five pages and then let them slide based on later play.

[Thor665]

To each their own - Ooba remains a town read for me, so I spit on your wagon.

::ptoo:: ::ptoo::

Have fun with that "I have a scum read but see no reason to tell town about it" thing. That's a normal town action.

Unvote: Mikeburnfire
Vote: MarchHare

[MarchHare]

Good to see you are as utterly incapable of comprehending the difference between personal and alignment-relevant differences in play style as you were however long ago.

[MarchHare]

Also, I explained my read. Feel free to actually read my posts. Feel free to read my last game, as well; the idiots in that game were as incompetent as you and made the same mistake.

[Ragnarokio]

Ooba's second post and possible his first feel bad, potentially because of the way he hopped onto your joke as if it were an opportunity to say something and to make a vote. The fact that he followed up by doing nothing (although the game had barely begun), potentially made the whole thing together seem a little suspicious. He later through suspicion onto another person based on one post without commenting on any of the other things that had happened in the game.

All that together makes him look negative.

[MarchHare]

Cool, put a donk on it.

[Ragnarokio]

whats a donk?

[Thor665]

I suspect 'donk' means vote.

[MarchHare]

Yeah, in this case.

[Ragnarokio]

I don't think the case is strong enough to warrant a vote yet.

[danakillsu]

@ MarchHare
Just trying to put some pressure on someone with at least a little reasoning. I hate your repeated attempts to make us think we can't find scum on page x.

unvote vote: MarchHare

[Ragnarokio]

What happened to your case on me?

[MarchHare]

@dana

, intuition ≠ very little reasoning.

I hate your repeated attempts to make us think we can't find scum on page x.

Wat.

BTW, I asked you a question. Do grace me with an answer.

[Ant_to_the_max]

Post 57 doesn't seem genuine ..

Never had that said to me, so I am not sure how to respond. Pointed out the three things that I felt like saying, and then used my vote for something. *shrugs*

Aren't you helpful.

Oh the irony

So how come I can't get another vote on mikeburnfire?

I did place mine, but then I got an acceptable reaction from him.

So MoS...what took you so long to join us?

[animorpherv1]

Gah. Um, so

unvote:mbf

I find Ragna's reasons to be accurate and henceforth correct. If more comes up, I may hop on this. I still do not like MarchHare's posting style.

[MarchHare]

Aren't you helpful.

Oh the irony

Wanna turn a critical eye to it?