I'm not the only one against Lurkers. Just after I stopped voting one of them you come out and do so. Bad timing, but I like it still.Zippy wrote:what means this....zu_Faul wrote:Hey, someone smart!
loFl...Illumina wrote:FOSZippy.
Firstly, you're being rude and (more specifically) impatient to lynch non-participators and lurkers. While some mafia are more than likely among the lurkers, it's still a blind guess, and one that you're unusually eager for us to try. Risky, especially when we can ID people first. This is a big source of suspicion for me.
Also, your little slip earlier doesn't help you.
You've got my vote gb, lets get this going.Zippy wrote:well, i'm more than happy to go that way as evidenced by my vote the last few weeks...Fritzler wrote:I'd really rather lynch LB, or at least push himi to claim.
but without the other 6 or 7 people from the sign up thread, yes i didn't call them players on purpose, we can't get much done...
:thumbsfuckingup:Flying Dutchman wrote:Unvote
Vote: Zippy
For being silly, swearing, to get us some information, and not the least of all: To finally try to finish this day.
Yeah, leave Zippy alone.Zippy wrote::thumbsfuckingup:Flying Dutchman wrote:Unvote
Vote: Zippy
For being silly, swearing, to get us some information, and not the least of all: To finally try to finish this day.
gotta love the reasoning there my friend..
nothing like lynching the one guy trying to do something in this god forsaken game...
Saying you were a mason just to see if people were paying attention, admitting you weren't, then saying you're confirmed. Seems weird - if its a joke, you failed to specify and I didn't follow the humor.loFl... what slip...
You ignored / sidestepped the reasons I presented. If someone's not participating, try to go for a replacement. We're not being productive in killing mafia if we blindly lynch someone who isn't participating. We're just as likely to waste time hitting a townie if we act without information.voting people off who aren't even f'n playing anymore needs to happen or the game continues to stagnate...
If you're that dissatisfied, ask to be modkilled and find another game. I can appreciate that the stagnation annoys you, but this looks more like a stunt than anything else. The town would not be acehieving anything practical.please feel free to lynch me, i would rather be the lynch than sit and watch paint dry in this game for another 6 months...
The idea, first and foremost, is to find mafia, not necessarily encourage those who participate. Obviously full participation would be great, but we have to work with what we have: we have some form of information about whoever is participating, while lynching a non-participant is a blind guess (unless it spurs them to participate, or we investigate them).how much sense does it make to allow a guy who has made one post since november continue to live while we instead lynch someone who is participatiing...
Who said we were trying to lynch silly swearers? Who said that? Who the fuck said that? I thought we were trying to find scum!! I guess the fairy fucking godmother climbed out of her piece of shit pumpkin and changed the rules!!! You slimy little communist shit, twinkle-toed cocksucker just signed your own death warrant. Out-fucking-standing. I will vote you until you fucking die. I'll vote you until your asshole is sucking buttermilk.Flying Dutchman wrote:Unvote
Vote: Zippy
For being silly, swearing, to get us some information, and not the least of all: To finally try to finish this day.
I'm not sure he was joking...mikeburnfire wrote:
My point still stands: from a town perspective, lynching blindly doesn't make sense. Seems to me that mafia are the ones who would encourage this, because they're the only ones who would benefit. Your message seems to be that we may as well try, becaue hey, weto say the town would not be achieving anything is quite naive, since how would you know unless you are scum...
Sure, we MIGHT get a positive result, but we will definately get A result which is something this game has been lacking for a month now.illumina wrote: My point still stands: from a town perspective, lynching blindly doesn't make sense. Seems to me that mafia are the ones who would encourage this, because they're the only ones who would benefit. Your message seems to be that we may as well try, becaue hey, we might get a positive result, and that's not going far in convincing me you're pro-town.
Example 1 wrote:Zippy wrote:don't lynch me, i'm a mason...TSAGod wrote:Zippy-
So how long has one vote been a huge bandwagon nearly dooming your fate?Monty wrote:probably since he's been surrounded by f'n morons...
Example 2 wrote:mikeburnfire wrote:Well, if nobody's going to summarize then I guess I'll just jump right in.
Vote Zippy for the mason claim and indifference towards other people's personal perdicaments.Monty wrote:is this where weunvote: vote mikeburnfire?
not enough to move my vote, but good enough for aExample 3 wrote:Zippy wrote:and seriously...
how much sense does it make to allow a guy who has made one post since november continue to live while we instead lynch someone who is participatiing...
we have more posts in this game in the last 24 hours than we had in 3 weeks...
all cuz i was f'n bored...Monty wrote:proxy to zippy