Raivann wrote:Silver's post restriction sure is scummy.
Vote:Seraphim
Let’s see, a jab at camn. Okay. Post underneath it is what I’m looking at.
Seraphim wrote:Raivann wrote:Silver's post restriction sure is scummy.
Vote:Seraphim
I most certainly did not say it was. Where in the world would you get that approximation?
This doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Seraphim’s response seems… paranoid to me. Raivann’s post didn’t even address Seraphim’s thoughts on the silverbullet wagon (presumably the vote was serious, I suppose, since Raivann seemed to acknowledge that things were happening when he went against camn’s threat) and Seraphim gives a more-exasperated-than-necessary response. He’s also not questioning the vote despite this being the first non-silverbullet vote in the game… without a case presented by Raivann it seems Seraphim is
aware
of what a case on him would be (because he didn’t ask why the vote was put down) so I don’t know if Seraphim was consciously being scummy or what. Do not like.
Pacman comes in and clears all of this up… okay.
HellloooNewman wrote: One last thought. Jester?
Maybe it’s just me, but Jester speculation goes down with experience. I’m sure if I played anything but Newbies in my early days, I’d have thought Jesters were pretty common too. Seraphim thinks otherwise.
Seraphim wrote:Vote: HellooooNewman
Jester speculation is lol. terrible vibes from that post.
Wha-
You’re voting Newman on “vibes”? I can understand how Jester speculation is a bit scummy but IMO it’s a newbtell more. I’m not going to call a difference on that matter a scumtell but these “vibes” and the reasons he doesn’t like the Jester speculation aren’t really explained.
Seraphim wrote:Jester speculation is always a great way for scum to casually exit a wagon that might be going south.
Oh, hmm. Never mind.
HellloooNewman wrote:And sorry for trying to figure out what Silver was doing. I suppose I should just keep my mouth shut and blindly follow someone elses lead.
*rolls eyes*
rrrrrrrgh AtE
Seraphim wrote:Thanks for confirming your scumminess. I'm sure the rest of the town appreciates it.
For the record, I hate these kinds of posts – “you’re scum” and “I’m Town”. Not a scumtell but it’s probably my biggest Mafia pet peeve. It does nothing to sway me and I doubt it sways others. Only people who need to reaffirm that they’re Town are people who aren’t confident in their towniness.
camn wrote:Some questions:
1) Mass nameclaim, anyone? Wanna lock down scum fakeclaims early on?
2) Empking - are you post restricted as well?
1) I’m fine with this (might be a bit late)… not that I can divine anything from it anyways >_>
2) I think that’s normal Empking
ThAdmiral wrote:2. Lol, probably not he just posts that way.
Heh.
Empking wrote:I'm forced to agree that camn's actions are looking quite significantly off.
Hoo boy.
Let’s see if he expands on this.
Raivann wrote:I can't be on a lynching wagon.
Nocmen wrote:So...bascially Raivan, you're saying that you're not going to vote until Lylo?
HellloooNewman wrote:That sounds to me like you are giving yourself a nice excuse to NOT hunt/vote scum.
The fuck? Did you two misunderstand the statement or misrep it? I’d like to say a bit of both. If he’s on the wagon at the time of the lynch, he dies. I thought it seemed pretty open-and-shut (inb4 I’m completely wrong). I don’t see any possible reason how somebody could interpret that as “I cannot scumhunt or shit happens”. Yeah, that was a misrep from the both of you.
Nocmen wrote:Ghostlin wrote:Seraphim, why did you vote Raviann?
This, I'm not liking seraphim's participation on the wagons
You were on Newman and Empking, too. Let’s check YOUR participation on these wagons.
Nocmen wrote:Vote: HelloNewman
(absolutely no more comment on the Newman wagon)
Nocmen wrote:I'm not too much a fan of Emp's play right now, with his vote and fos it seems a bit too cautious for what i mentioned previously.
Emp points out he's a hypocrit for staying on the wagon, but at the same time he gets another quick wagon to L-2.
Vote: empking
Empking is a bit better but no way are you going to claim Seraphim’s the only one wagoning just for the sake of wagoning. Also, you’re going to say Empking’s scummy for being cautious with an FoS but scummy for voting on the wagon?
What are you talking about?
populartajo wrote:not being productive is a nulltell from emp.
Not being productive is not really a tell, no. But it
is
scummy no matter who it is, and I don’t know why you’re deciding to give Empking a free pass on this one because of some convoluted meta argument.
(look at me, arguing about productivity)
Seraphim wrote:don't you think it's weird that seraphim's 3 votes are all wagon votes?
You know,
where 2 out of the three
were pretty much following onto the wagon that was forming up?
...how are ALL my votes wagon votes when one of them STARTED a fucking wagon? The bolded statements are contradictory. I smell bullshit wafting through the air. All of my votes have had good reasoning behind them, I don't care if there's a wagon there or not. Also, how is wagon-hopping scummy anyway?
Null on this. Nocmen’s providing conflicting statements here but I didn’t see “good reasoning” behind the Raivann vote until a while after the vote was dropped.
Re: Raivann’s role. He says he’s getting information overnight, no? While his claim makes wagon analysis kind of a bitch, the information he gets overnight can be used to test the validity of his fullclaim. If he’s got extremely vague information which isn’t worth a cent, we have him hammer our D2 lynch. If he’s got information that makes him dangerous to scum, then scum resolve the problem themselves. However, Nocmen and HellloooNewman’s statements that Raivann is unable to scumhunt are kinda loads of bull since there’s absolutely no clause in what he’s said so far that says he can’t scumhunt. I’m not pleased with his current performance but I don’t think this is an issue to be resolved today.
Vote: Nocmen