268: Bugsy Malone Mafia - Game over. Mod learns lesson

[Tamuz]

Okay, dumbas

s

.

Unless you calm down a slight bit I'mma stop reading posts my Maz Medias so somebody will have to tell me what he is saying.

Plus your suspicion of me seems to me as useless as mine of the masons. Nobody counterclaimed me & Bugsy is too important to not be in the game esp. with Blousey already known dead. On top of that the Mod tells us that good guys are obvious. So, as far as I know and am concerned there should be very little reason to doubt me.

Then again, I'm a lying cheating dumbfuck who somehow managed to garner your hate and therefore I am scum, neh?

[Pariah]

Can we please all just call down?

I would

much

rather see Foolster lynched today than Maz.

Vote: Foolster

[Tamuz]

Sure

[Pariah]

Sure

Thank you.

[Tamuz]

We are only half.

But still there is the matter of Ballsy mafia ploys which would be good if you talked about. And about Adele leading the town. And how the Masons have been scummy during the game. ...

[broomhead]

i am going to wait till i see a vote count before i unvote/different vote, i mean foolster really should be lynched because he has the scummiest claim by far, and then maz should be lynched because he is the scummiest in general

[Fritzler]

Adele, does maz fall under lynch all jerks or whatever the hell you said?

[Tamuz]

i am going to wait till i see a vote count before i unvote/different vote, i mean foolster really should be lynched because he has the scummiest claim by far, and then maz should be lynched because he is the scummiest in general

Foolster can be tested via me.
Even if I die you guys will then have the knowledge that I am BM with certainty and you can reevaluate from there. I'm happy voting Maz

[Pariah]

I was under the impression Foolster claimed to be a limited mason with BM, and BM claimed to be a limited mason with someone else, or did I misread that...?

Unvote: Foolster

for now anyway, don't want to make a mistake.

[Tamuz]

I could have been a limited mason with Blousey. However, she died the night I sent her in as a choice and I never got to talk with her.

Foolster supposedly can 'find' me at night and become a limited mason with me. As far as his claim goes if not for the name it would have sounded right.

I live and cannot mason with foolster than he is scum.
I de, then you guys get to reassess the situation but you wll have the solid knowledge that Tamuz= BM

[chaotic_diablo]

Tamuz claimed limited masonry with a dead townie. Foolster claimed tamuz was a vig. One of them are lying, perhaps both.

[Tamuz]

More importantly Foolster claimed he can mason with me that is testable

[chaotic_diablo]

Foolster's limited masonry is valid in my opinion. We cannot confirm that Blousey actually recieved a message claiming that she could mason with BM, especially when she was a townie. Without proof, it can work both ways. If Foolster claims that he can mason with BM, then it's possible that Tamuz wasn't informed either.
The only point that is strange is foolster's claim that BM is a vig.

[Tamuz]

N1 I checked if Fritzler was my mason. And I ended up getting a PM back sayng that Fritzler wasn't my gal. So I'd definately think one of the two will get a PM back.

[Tamuz]

Couldn't someone else stay up 24/7 and bandy with me in this thread. I gotta say the two pages back there where Fritze and I were going at it where good.

[Tamuz]

And that I can't spell at 11:08 at night. Myspace degenerates my english

[Adele]

I doubt you're still up...

@Tamuz, I reckon Stark's claim and Fritzler's claim support each other. Stark knew there was some "knuckles"-type quality to Fritz earlier in the game; later, Fritzler claimed "Knuckles". Unless you can suggest a role in the movie that fits the clue and is anti-town, I think Fritzler's verified. And, by extension, so am I and Broomhead. The only alternative I can think of is that Stark is scum with us, which I think you'll agree is extremely unlikely.
And the thing about you verifying Foolster is, say you both survive and you say he's innocent. Can we trust that? Not necessarily; that evidence makes sense in light of you both being innocent

or

both being scum.

@Maz, stop it!

11 Remember, it’s a game and it’s supposed to be fun. Be nice to your fellow players and your mod. I have zero tolerance for abusive posts.

You are way over the line. If you get angry, step away from the computer 'til you can trust yourself not break the rules both of our mod and of common courtesy.

@Fritzler,

Adele, does maz fall under lynch all jerks or whatever the hell you said?

still not talking to you.
(*sigh*... get over it, Adele)
Yes, he does. But this isn't day one, the really bad stuff all took place over a single night, and I'd be willing to think he's just a hothead, but we have to play careful today. I don't trust him, but I think now is exactly the time to NOT escalate things out of anger... we've seen the danger in that.

[Fritzler]

Why aren't you talking to me?

[Adele]

You were mean . I got over it, though .

..."worst ever"?

[Fritzler]

Wait, what?
When was i mean?

[Adele]

eh. You just said I was a crappy co-mason. No big.

...it

was

a big for a couple hours there, and then there was the seething resentment. But your male cluelessness made me laugh and I'm totally over it now.

[broomhead]

I reckon Stark's claim and Fritzler's claim support each other. Stark knew there was some "knuckles"-type quality

as i think-or want to believe that he's innocent, he could have just guessed at a likely charter to be in this game, almost like saying, i think there's someone named bugsy in this game. just playing devil's advocate here.

[Fritzler]

I reckon Stark's claim and Fritzler's claim support each other. Stark knew there was some "knuckles"-type quality

as i think-or want to believe that he's innocent, he could have just guessed at a likely charter to be in this game, almost like saying, i think there's someone named bugsy in this game. just playing devil's advocate here.

But specifically guessed that my name was knuckles? Unlikely.

[Fritzler]

eh. You just said I was a crappy co-mason. No big.

...it

was

a big for a couple hours there, and then there was the seething resentment. But your male cluelessness made me laugh and I'm totally over it now.

Glad to know I have that effect.

[chaotic_diablo]

I reckon Stark's claim and Fritzler's claim support each other. Stark knew there was some "knuckles"-type quality

as i think-or want to believe that he's innocent, he could have just guessed at a likely charter to be in this game, almost like saying, i think there's someone named bugsy in this game. just playing devil's advocate here.

What we can tell, is that Stark is a cop. He has not been counterclaimed, therefore he most likely is. The only way you could doubt him is if we have no cop or Stark is an evil cop.