I am a girl, just so you know.
@Zorblag on WingDamage: He does not ever appear to be scumhunting; he never felt suspicious about any one person to go and dig deeper on. He consistently said "still unsure on everyone", "no strong reads on anyone". He did express suspicion of me, but never asked me anything so I could respond. That bothers me, because that isn't like my style of play. When I find someone who seems guilty, I dig deeper in on that person until I'm satisfied. Looking at Wing's posts in ISO, he never does any digging, his posts are one or two lines each - filled with either scorn, votes, promises to post more [which never happened], and his Doctor claim.
It was at this point [the claim] that us newbs lost control of the game, and I honestly feel like we're being handled, and shown a certain way to think. You, Zorblag, came onto the scene and handily convinced us that Wing is telling the truth. Now, granted, a lot of his posts could be like a doctor keeping a low profile - but it is the lack of scumhunting that is sticking in my craw. Up until this point, I've been getting a town read on Wing, but it was just based on intuition. I never really looked at Wing because of this. Looking at him in ISO right now though, opens up possibilities that he's the real scum, at this point. I'm suspicious of you and Wing at this point in time.
I'm conflicted though, because the mafia failed or did not kill last night. If the scum were newbs, then we should believe they failed, because all newbs would attempt a kill. If they were experienced people, then we should believe they failed, or are running a gambit.
In the beginning I really focused on Misder for his apparent "knowledge" - but after I saw his massive scumhunting efforts on day 1, I was sure he was a townie. It seems as if his intuition is working the same as mine. That is why I unvoted him [unsuccessfully since it was post lynch!]. There is a major difference between Wingdamage and Misder or me, for instance.
Which brings me to another observation of WingDamage: I don't think he's the newb he portrays himself to be. Watch the diction in his writings:
Post 27:
WingDamage9001 wrote:Vote McGriddle
Told ya.
As for crazy's questions,
1. This is my second game here, and I have three games on another site.
2. I enjoy playing mafia because it is fun. Heh.
@[L] - My wings aren't the ones that are damaged...
But he says things like this, that sound experienced to me:
Post 140:
WingDamage9001 wrote:cjdrum wrote:Well, nobody wants to get lynched. It's like saying "Oh, that person voted for someone. Scum vote for people."
Or even "That person was talking. Scum talk. That person must be scum."
I've been trying to keep up with the IC, and his reasons seemed good. And then he's been all... Mm.
So I've been lost - I've already been programmed to trust ICs, and everything threw me off and I've gone haywire. It's kind of hard to keep up with... What Romanus is being.
Lalala WIFOM lalala...
This post is exactly how I expect to see newb scum respond to strong pressure. I very much expect cj to flip scum at this point.
Unvote, vote cjdrum
This comment about "newb scum" strikes me as someone who is well versed in these games.
@Zorblag on MuffinMan: I find that he uses a lot of WIFOM, and obviously so. Whether he's using it to throw people off [as scum], or is really trying to gain understanding of certain mechanics is hard to tell. Looking at MuffinMan in ISO, I see a lot of scummy things from him.
Some things he says really bother me, like:
zMuffinMan wrote:
I was defending the point strongly because it tied in with one of the reasons I'm suspicious of crazypianist today. crazypianist posted without even looking at possible alternatives. I don't like that. Even if they aren't as likely, they're still possible.
And yes, this particular part of my argument is similar to one particular part of my argument against Prosaurus. That is very perceptive of you, Zorblag.
Defending at this point is not what a townie would be concerned with doing. It is almost as if he is deflecting to crazy.
And when he says "How perceptive of you, Zorblag", that sent chills down my spine. Intuition says he fails.
zMuffinMan wrote:OK, I'm going to lay some thoughts out based on the claims that I've had a some time to think through.
First of all, the claims eliminate two setups. With no cop claim, there are only two possible setups left:
# 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Townies, or
# 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Sane Doctor, 6 Townie
I'll cover my thoughts on the second scenario first, since I think it is more likely.
Just speaking probability - I see many more possibilities than that. How does he settle on one as being more likely than the other one? Scummy.
As for crazy, I've never looked at him in depth because others set off my scumdar more than he. I'll post my thoughts on crazy later today when I have time.
Regarding Zorblag, I have a loud suspicion that I'm being gamed by him. It's as if he came into the game, declared a person innocent, took control - when his predecessor looked very scummy to most people [and to me, in hindsight].
Because I'm suspicious of Wing, Zorblag, and Muffin, I'll be placing my vote now.
I vote Muffin because his overall diction is not appealing to me.
Vote: zMuffinMan