Of the 4 claims, I think seraph is most likely to be scum. greyICE a close second.
Seraph has changed his story too many times to be trustworthy. Others have already laid out the case there's no reason for me to repeat everything. I was going to point out the stuff Vi just did in 834. Only thing I will add is the appeal to fear - "beware if you lynch me you'll still have to worry about the millers
". OK I'll say something else. Seraph is voting Vi and claims its not against his wincon, but says he won't venge-kill a miller (vi) because he doesn't think a miller is vicious.
vote:Seraph
greyICE is the only one to claim at L-1. I've had some concerns, but so far he's had reasonable answers. 1-shot investigate in the presence of 2 millers is ???. The fact that RDC is not the absolute confirmed scum group yet is also an open question but one that should be cleared up sooner or later.
Vi's miller claim is probably real. She planned it in her first post, and her only intent to claim was to get seraph lynched. It didn't seem like the time to just come out and claim miller as scum for no reason. Maybe one of the other wagons (toasty/greyICE?) are a scum partner, but even then putting heavy suspecion on yourself to save a scum partner? i don't think so... I actually give pro-town points for claiming miller AFTER an investigative role has claimed - saves the investigative role from saving a shot. Vi could have just sat on the miller claim, and if greyICE used the investigate on Vi, she could have pointed out the breadcrums then.
This is going to be a similar paragraph regarding jahudo. no reason to claim other than to CC Vi, and if seraph is town and jahudo is lying scum, no reason to do that at all when seraph was already likely going down. I can't explain the inconsistencies between Vi's and Jahudo's miller claims though.
I think seraph is the right lynch for today.