Post #92
Lane0168 wrote:Oh and as far as my buddy buddy with drk? i'm new, not an idiot. you can stop looking into that bull. if you can't see it was a response to his signature.
Lane0168 wrote:Oh and as far as my buddy buddy with drk? i'm new, not an idiot. you can stop looking into that bull. if you can't see it was a response to his signature.
how dare you play the newbie card as an excuselane wrote:i'm new, not an idiot.
Because as Town I can never ...
both came before. are these not claims of being town?No, I am not scum. Are you?
do you not read my other posts?tclawren wrote:@TwistedspoonDo you haveanythingon Lane besides your silly buddying thing?
Also it's L-3. I forgot Friend's unvote.
Replace TS with "either TS or tcl". I'm kind of failing at reading both of them right now, but whatever. It's page 5 and we have obv-scum andrew to lynch anyway.I wrote:Perhaps TS deserves one of those 3 scum spots...
You are correct ... Friend did say that not you - my quick-read through mistake.DeathRowKitty wrote:Friend called it scum-driven, not me.
And seriously MoI, read andrew's games and THEN make that statement.
I'm looking at all of this, and I do NOT like the fact that you are trying to build a case on MoI based on his obvious Night 1 NK joke. He never tried to set himself up as an elite player or an influential one, and the fact that you're focusing on that instead of looking at other players shows an extreme amount of bogus tunneling, or a newbie attempt to set someone up as trying to "get the advantage" when that was never the case. This is my main problem with you right now.2)Well your odds of getting killed night 1 being town are twice as high as being mafia. I myself would consider that being DOUBLE the odds of being killed as mafia. The reason being that if you are town, you have 2 factions trying to kill you, and if you are mafia, you have only one.
3) I did not say you are influential. You asserted that yourself in your first post. I also see it being advantageous (is that a word?) for the other anti-town faction keeping you around because there are 9 of us, and only 1 or 2 of you, and only 2 or 1 of them. so why not go against 1 or 2 of you, when compared to 9? if i have the town alignment correct?
4) of course you aren't/will
5) That i had to mention it? playing in real life, i sometimes feel the need to bring some points to light, which is why i pointed out that i was being... questioned? no suspected. cause i've been questioned the entire time just for questioning. and i am sorry, but I myself do not have a "above and beyond the norm" response around here. i can understand other players. but i'm coming in with my own play.d
6)I have read some of the games... not entire games. but plenty of parts. and i have seen people be pointed out, just for the point of stating their opinions too early. i didnt want to be someone voted out. i quickly realized it wasn't to my advantage and thought "shit son, why am I NOT saying what i think?" and therefore decided to say what i think.
7)"but seriously, you're high" is nothing BUT dismissive. we can all agree on that. and because demon asks andrew a question DOES have something to do my reaction. do you think that my asking andrew a question is going to be any different than demon asking him the same question? and if it does than you should look at andrew (i'm not). I felt the issue had been addressed by demon, and therefore responded with my own comic relief.
Restating everything exactly how MoI and parroting doesn't get anyone anywhere, especially since my point is that I agreed pretty strongly with his case. Lane hasn't been responding well and is focusing on the distracting parts of this game instead of focusing his reads and actually trying to scumhunt.alright, lane just looks like flailing.
he hugs and loves everyone that says hes town(blatant buddying) = scum number 1
demon hybrid, says moi explained everything i said, im pretty sure i explained it the same way he did, and he just said it all over again.
= bussing scum number 1
More than enough reasoning? That's hardly more than enough reasoning. TC has a point; you've given minimal reasoning to join the Lane wagon, especially so late too, and that amount of reasoning ("buddying up" to a player of a non-confirmed alignment) is extremely small. It just looks like an excuse from you more than anything.Twistedspoon wrote:I had my reasons a few pages ago; more than enough to justify a vote then.
trying to win people over by buddying; not logic is just so scummy. It definately deserves my votelane0168 wrote:*thanks drk. i feel you're a real asset to the team, and life would be a bit darker without you
Obvious to you it may be. However, I was unaware that it was a joke. I thought my inserting positivity joke was pretty obvious... some do not agree.DemonHybrid wrote:I'm looking at all of this, and I do NOT like the fact that you are trying to build a case on MoI based on his obvious Night 1 NK joke. He never tried to set himself up as an elite player or an influential one, and the fact that you're focusing on that instead of looking at other players shows an extreme amount of bogus tunneling, or a newbie attempt to set someone up as trying to "get the advantage" when that was never the case. This is my main problem with you right now