3 VisMaior (VitaminR, mith, Flying Dutchman)
1 RoadBird (EnderX)
2 armlx (Fuldu, Kerplunk)
1 LyingBrian (VisMaior)
In general, I think a hider would be a fairly bad lynch. In the long run, it becomes a combination of a reasonably unnightkillable role with limited investigative power (since a hider who hides with scum is usually killed). Assuming I was equally suspicious of the two players, I'd probably be slightly more inclined to lynch someone who claimed roleblocker over someone who claimed hider on Day One. As the game progresses, this would probably shift, since it's easier to prove roles like RB than hider.Flying Dutchman wrote:VisMaior seems suspicious enough to me. A 'hider' wouldn't be such a bad lynch now, would it?
Those are some impressive examples of selective quoting. And of The Bible, no less. For shame. The full passages are:LyingBrian wrote:i don't think we have 2 hiders in the game....
the silent speaker was given the reference Job 14:13 upon his death, which i would attribute more to a hider than Psalm 32:7, the reference VisMaior is claiming...
Job 14:13 - "you would hide me...and conceal me"
Psalm 32:7 - "you will protect me"
maybe the key is in the verb?!?... just a thought...
Since you brought it up again:Flying Dutchman wrote:Since neither makes any sense in this setting.
Besides the extremely bad quoting you are implying that God....euh...Mod will not tell us whether someone had a particular role. What do you base that spooky thought on?LyingBrian wrote:i don't think we have 2 hiders in the game....
RoadBird wrote: Besides the extremely bad quoting you are implying that God....euh...Mod will not tell us whether someone had a particular role. What do you base that spooky thought on?
God wrote: Upon death, only the verse number of the deceased players will be given. However, different colouring of the verse numbers will reveal alignment.
Stop partial quoting, please!RoadBird wrote:Vote: Flying Dutchman
Since you brought it up again:Flying Dutchman wrote:Since neither makes any sense in this setting.
What is the setting? Are you trying to tell us that there are no normal roles because we have a bible verse iso a name.
Since in the time the Bible stories happen (Before 100 AC, roughly) there are no reporters and no commuters in the normal sense I considered those out-of-setting. What's so weird about that?!Flying Dutchman wrote:Are we thinking "Cowardly Reporter" or "Commuter"? Since neither makes any sense in this setting.
i'm not sure i understand this question fully... if you're asking why i think Cadmium will not reveal the roles, the answer is b/c he said he wouldn'tRoadBird wrote:Besides the extremely bad quoting you are implying that God....euh...Mod will not tell us whether someone had a particular role. What do you base that spooky thought on?
Cadmium wrote:Upon death, only the verse number of the deceased players will be given.
Which is the backtrack I had expected to hear, but it's still not consistent with the fact that tss died. Nor is it consistent with the fact that you didn't use the word "doctor" anywhere in the post, which was why I went ahead with my accusation when that possibility occurred to me. Your post looked then, and still looks, like what I said it did. The fact that it was framed in a way that allows for an alternative explanation doesn't make it any less scummy seeming.LyingBrian wrote:you misinterpreted my post (somehow that's ironical)... i meant that i thought the silent speaker was a hider & VisMaior was a doctor... that wouldn't be unusual in a game this size, would it? the reason i partial quoted the verses was a) b/c i figured anybody could look up the full verse, b) i was trying to emphasize the verbs...
Fuldu wrote:Which is the backtrack I had expected to hear, but it's still not consistent with the fact that tss died. Nor is it consistent with the fact that you didn't use the word "doctor" anywhere in the post, which was why I went ahead with my accusation when that possibility occurred to me. Your post looked then, and still looks, like what I said it did. The fact that it was framed in a way that allows for an alternative explanation doesn't make it any less scummy seeming.
You are right. I'm sorry.Flying Dutchman wrote:Stop partial quoting, please!
Flying Dutchman wrote:Are we thinking "Cowardly Reporter" or "Commuter"? Since neither makes any sense in this setting.
I completely agree with you here. A Cowardly Reporter or Commuter would be completely out-of-setting. But you know as well as the rest of us that we only have a bible verse and do not have a role. I thought that was the reason why you typed "Commuter" instead of just Commuter. So what's so weird about that? You suggesting we have roles with names. I'll stick with my vote.Flying Dutchman wrote:Since in the time the Bible stories happen (Before 100 AC, roughly) there are no reporters and no commuters in the normal sense I considered those out-of-setting. What's so weird about that?!
Hm. I completely missed that for some reason. My bad.LyingBrian wrote:i'm not sure i understand this question fully... if you're asking why i think Cadmium will not reveal the roles, the answer is b/c he said he wouldn't
Agreed. Understood.Commodore Amazing wrote:Just so everyone knows, I'm not voting for Dutchman because of an investigation, I just think he's really scummy, and he hasn't done anything since I started pretending I had a guilty investigation on him to convince me otherwise.