P.T. Barnum wrote:Xalxe: you seriously thought the scum were going to line up three votes to hammer someone on day one?
I'm only pushing this point because this seems like irrational fear to scare off potential wagons. I don't think the idiotking wagon built that quickly in the first place.
Agree 100%
Can't see any chance of scum pushing through a quick lynch at this point, would be a crazy move and if they did then they'd almost certainly give away at least one of them maybe more. Maybe in a newbie game if all the scum were playing the first game. Surely getting a few wagons to look for reactions is the best way to get the game out of RVS. Black mark against Xalxe in my (green) book
Cecily wrote:I've never liked pushes this early in the game. They sometimes (oftentimes) start wagons that lead to a townie getting killed with very little reason. At least that's how it's gone in my experience, so I'm wary when someone tries to get one going so soon, especially after RVS and without any explanation.
Well after getting a similar push against me (as town) in 1040 for using Random.org and then finding out it was led by scum, I can emphasise with this.
The above was accompanied by pretty notable tunnelling though - don't see anything wrong with rat's push so far. Questioning his reponse is good, given his reponses looks like he wants everyone else to get the game going which is not pro-town.
havingfitz wrote:
As an aside...if any of you have ever played with andrew94 before...he is a pleasant enough player but is nothing but a detriment to town. I'd be up for cutting town losses and just removing the detriment before he gets too far in the game to where he (if town) would actually be relied on for his gameplay...not lamented for it. I.e. I'm up for an andrew94 policy lynch.
No I haven't. Think its pretty off to be talking policy lynches at this point though and pretty scummy for that matter.