I don't think the people actually playing this game should be punished for the actions of those who aren't playing. If you send out prods, at least give them some time to respond to them, read the thread, and make a meaningful contribution. I'd be most grateful if you could give us an extension.
Mafia 44: Generic - Abandoned!
-
-
Falcone Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 731
- Joined: August 27, 2005
- Location: Leuven, Belgium
Vote: Extend deadline
I don't think the people actually playing this game should be punished for the actions of those who aren't playing. If you send out prods, at least give them some time to respond to them, read the thread, and make a meaningful contribution. I'd be most grateful if you could give us an extension.-
-
Dranko20 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 806
- Joined: December 16, 2004
- Location: CA
-
-
logicticus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Phoenix
-
-
Blackberry berry
-
-
Sineish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: June 20, 2005
- Location: London, UK
Vote: Fritzler
I don't really trust his claim. He's claiming a minor information role (where we won't be too surprised if the mafia don't knock him off over the next couple of nights). He's also claiming to have no information, first by having targetted a dead role, the only one of the four that is probably a backup, and second by having been roleblocked. I don't buy it and I think it's a role we can afford to be without given the slim chance he's telling the truth.
S.-
-
naubol Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 23
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Fritzler More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: July 26, 2005
-
-
Fritzler More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: July 26, 2005
Sineish wrote:Vote: Fritzler
I don't really trust his claim. He's claiming a minor information role (where we won't be too surprised if the mafia don't knock him off over the next couple of nights). He's also claiming to have no information, first by having targetted a dead role, the only one of the four that is probably a backup, and second by having been roleblocked. I don't buy it and I think it's a role we can afford to be without given the slim chance he's telling the truth.
S.
Its an easily testable role. If stykker uses his ability tonight I can check him out, and see who he targetted for his masonry before anyone else does. Do you honestly want to lynch a testable role?Surfs up dude.-
-
jediknight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 18, 2004
- Location: Illinois
It's an interesting set of developments...
I don't trust Fritzler...for more than just the fact that Brian voted him. He is the lead of most of the bandwagons and I get the scum vibe. And I trust my scum vibe very muchly...except when I don't. As far as Fritzler for someone that said he isn't sure what he does he sure says above me that he can check strykker and see who he targets. Didn't you say that you didn't know how it worked? I'd like some more information on how that works pretty please...
I do trust Brian...cause I have my reasons. My role also knows, or thinks that he knows apparently but could have forgotten some key details, that there are a set of mason cops. Be advised...I am not one of the two mason cops. But that makes me trust Snap. And makes me want to smack him in the head for neglecting to turn in his choice if he is indeed who he says he is. Strykkerverde is mostly confirmed for now because he was able to do what he set out to do.
I want to know why shamrock all of a sudden trusts armlx and why he is pretty sure about fritzler. Did I miss a page or something? And I'm not the world's most active person at this game but there are people that I don't even know that are in this game.
Iconfirm vote: fritzlerat this point. An interesting choice for Strykkerverde would be to invite me and Snap to sit with him this night.And I'm spent...-
-
Snap Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 32
- Joined: November 21, 2005
Go for it, smack me in the head. I'll freely admit, not getting my choices in in time was stupid, but like I said, the deadline snuck up on me and I can't talk to my partner after I submit my choice. My partner has posted within the last 48 hours, so is still active in the game, but I'm not willing to expose another cop.-
-
Falcone Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 731
- Joined: August 27, 2005
- Location: Leuven, Belgium
Blackberry, what are your reasons for voting me?
Snap's claimed role looks really powerful, if used well. I don't necessarily trust him yet; it's mighty convenient for him to say he didn't send in night choices. But I don't think he should reveal his partner at the moment. Jedi's confirmation that there are mason cops in the game is a point in his favour, but since his role apparently forgot some details, we can't go on that alone. After all, one of the cops could be scum. Snap, do you know for certain that your partner is innocent?
Fritzler's claim seems testable to me, although his lack of useful results is a point against him.-
-
TSAGod Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 496
- Joined: September 20, 2005
- Location: Pennsylvania
Snap wrote:Well, as the deadlione is tomorrow, I'll claim. I'm a mason cop. I can only talk to my mason partner (who I'll not name unless they want to come forward) up until the point we send off our investigation targets each night. We're more reliable if we both target the same person. Unfortunately, both nights so far I've been caught by an unexpected dawn befroe I could get my target in, so I've got no useful information thus far.unvote, vote snap
Really. Could this role be any lamer? It's possible, but if you aren't going to get an investigation for two nights in a row, it's completely useless.-
-
Sineish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: June 20, 2005
- Location: London, UK
I guess not, let's give it a go.Fritzler wrote:Its an easily testable role. If stykker uses his ability tonight I can check him out, and see who he targetted for his masonry before anyone else does. Do you honestly want to lynch a testable role?
Unvote: Fritzler
A couple of questions for themod, are we under a 'day ending' deadline or is it just a deadline for people to post or be replaced? If we are under a day ending deadline, what is the situation with regards to the number of votes needed for a lynch?
S.-
-
Fritzler More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: July 26, 2005
I don't know exactly how it works, I know everynight I get to hack someone, preveiously its been a tracking result on Iammars. I'm assuming it will be a tracking result on Strykker tonight.jediknight wrote:II don't trust Fritzler...for more than just the fact that Brian voted him. He is the lead of most of the bandwagons and I get the scum vibe. And I trust my scum vibe very muchly...except when I don't. As far as Fritzler for someone that said he isn't sure what he does he sure says above me that he can check strykker and see who he targets. Didn't you say that you didn't know how it worked? I'd like some more information on how that works pretty please...Surfs up dude.-
-
jediknight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 18, 2004
- Location: Illinois
Man...I'm not good on these quote things. So then how do you "see who he targetted for his masonry before anyone else does?" Do you have reason to believe that you see the action and the reciever of the action? I'm not buying it.Fritzler wrote:Sineish wrote:Vote: Fritzler
I don't really trust his claim. He's claiming a minor information role (where we won't be too surprised if the mafia don't knock him off over the next couple of nights). He's also claiming to have no information, first by having targetted a dead role, the only one of the four that is probably a backup, and second by having been roleblocked. I don't buy it and I think it's a role we can afford to be without given the slim chance he's telling the truth.
S.
Its an easily testable role. If stykker uses his ability tonight I can check him out, and see who he targetted for his masonry before anyone else does. Do you honestly want to lynch a testable role?And I'm spent...-
-
Fritzler More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: July 26, 2005
Well, like I said, I found out Iammars made no choice, I guess I jumped the gun when I said I was a tracker, we'll see tonight. I bet my role will get really cool thiough, cuz Dranko was all like, you have a really cool role, and i was like but what's it do, and he was like you'll find out.jediknight wrote:
Man...I'm not good on these quote things. So then how do you "see who he targetted for his masonry before anyone else does?" Do you have reason to believe that you see the action and the reciever of the action? I'm not buying it.Fritzler wrote:Sineish wrote:Vote: Fritzler
I don't really trust his claim. He's claiming a minor information role (where we won't be too surprised if the mafia don't knock him off over the next couple of nights). He's also claiming to have no information, first by having targetted a dead role, the only one of the four that is probably a backup, and second by having been roleblocked. I don't buy it and I think it's a role we can afford to be without given the slim chance he's telling the truth.
S.
Its an easily testable role. If stykker uses his ability tonight I can check him out, and see who he targetted for his masonry before anyone else does. Do you honestly want to lynch a testable role?Surfs up dude.-
-
Snap Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 32
- Joined: November 21, 2005
Like I've said, I'm not outing my mason partner without consulting him on it first, which I can't do until Night. If he wants to come forward of his own accord, that would be great, but it doesn't look like he's going to at the moment. Now, I don't know for certain that he's definately innocent, but as yet I have no reason to suspect that he's not.
What I do find suspect are the people trying to get me to out my partner. You've had no reason to suspect him so far, and as far as I know he'll continue being a cop if I die, so it seems to me like scum trying to find out as many cops as possible. I'm going tounvote: armlxfor the moment, though I still have strong suspicions about him, but at the moment I'm far more suspicioous of other people, soFoS: Chamber-
-
jediknight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 18, 2004
- Location: Illinois
Is this mod quoting? And it does seem that you're backpedaling now that I've asked you how you are going to manage to see the action and the recipient.Fritzler wrote:Well, like I said, I found out Iammars made no choice, I guess I jumped the gun when I said I was a tracker, we'll see tonight. I bet my role will get really cool thiough, cuz Dranko was all like, you have a really cool role, and i was like but what's it do, and he was like you'll find out.
Snap...don't out your partner by any stretch of the imagination. But I have an idea so Strykker...please pick me and Snap for your bar visit.And I'm spent...-
-
BrianMcQueso My Wit is Broken
- My Wit is Broken
- My Wit is Broken
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: November 8, 2004
- Location: San Francisco
Jedi, I understand what you're getting at. You guys are throwing me a surprise party! ^_^
I, for one, entirely believe Snap's role. Dranko was a mason cop in Duckburg Mafia. I'd see it as likely that he'd add a similar role to this game. [/metagaming]
vote: TSAGodI wouldn't vote for claimed masons this early, and I wouldn't vote for claimed cops this early. You're doing both. They're both somewhat-confirmable roles, and they both hold a lot of pro-town power."Only a fool quotes himself." -BrianMcQueso-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
-
-
jediknight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 18, 2004
- Location: Illinois
How did you know??? And I suppose you already know what my present is to you? Yep...you guessed it. I gave you aFISH!
I'm still not totally buying Fritzler's claim and its not all that provable or useful for that matter the way that he explains it. I mean what can he do come back tomorrow and say "yup...so and so did something last night? So they must be...what?" He can't really confirm good or bad which makes it a sketchy roleclaim to me at best.
So Blackberry...what are your good reasons for Falcone?And I'm spent...-
-
BrianMcQueso My Wit is Broken
- My Wit is Broken
- My Wit is Broken
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: November 8, 2004
- Location: San Francisco
Yeah, like they'll have any idea what that's in reference to.Jedi wrote:Yep...you guessed it. I gave you a FISH!
"Only a fool quotes himself." -BrianMcQueso-
-
armlx Most JDTay-like
- Most JDTay-like
- Most JDTay-like
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: February 25, 2005
-
-
TSAGod Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 496
- Joined: September 20, 2005
- Location: Pennsylvania
First off, I'm not you. Second off, masons are confirmable by determining who the partner is, but if you're part of a mafia, you can find somebody to be part of the team easily. And you don't really need to say anything if the other dies and turns up as scum other than "it never said we were protown." Thirdly, missing two nightchoices in a row sucks, and as a cop, all you have to say is "x is innocent," and then you can be naive if anybody gets nightkilled and turns up scum. Everything can be easily faked with the help of a mafia.BrianMcQueso wrote:vote: TSAGodI wouldn't vote for claimed masons this early, and I wouldn't vote for claimed cops this early. You're doing both. They're both somewhat-confirmable roles, and they both hold a lot of pro-town power.
So...that's why I don't exactly trust him. But if you can show me a better option, I'm all for it.-
-
chamber Cases are scummy
- Cases are scummy
- Cases are scummy
- Posts: 10703
- Joined: November 20, 2005
And in this case he can claim he didn't target the same person as his partner, or that even when targeting the same person he doesnt get 100% true info.TSAGod wrote:
First off, I'm not you. Second off, masons are confirmable by determining who the partner is, but if you're part of a mafia, you can find somebody to be part of the team easily. And you don't really need to say anything if the other dies and turns up as scum other than "it never said we were protown." Thirdly, missing two nightchoices in a row sucks, and as a cop, all you have to say is "x is innocent," and then you can be naive if anybody gets nightkilled and turns up scum. Everything can be easily faked with the help of a mafia.BrianMcQueso wrote:vote: TSAGodI wouldn't vote for claimed masons this early, and I wouldn't vote for claimed cops this early. You're doing both. They're both somewhat-confirmable roles, and they both hold a lot of pro-town power.
So...that's why I don't exactly trust him. But if you can show me a better option, I'm all for it.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.