A vote based on a "funny feeling", and a joking comment. Acceptable reasons, sure, but not really "careful thinking".BrianMcQueso wrote:Looking back over the Twomz lynch yesterday, Fritzler's behavior made me feel funny. His attitude once Twomz had been lynched (but not before day closed) wasn't very protownly. If I had checked in and realized we had lynched a doctor, my reaction would probably be more like Falcone's
than Fritzler's. "You're lynched. Bye buddy." Isn't the remorseful response I'd expect out of a realization that we lynched a valuable power role.
A vote based on ... ? He says he doesn't know Fritzler is suspicious or not, and anyway, he just wants to hear another stupid joke. Great thinking here.TSAGod wrote:Fritzler may have been not remorseful, but it is hard to tell if it's his playing style or scumminess.
Neverless, it's not exactly a bad action, though I would just prefer to coax another Snap joke from him.
unvote, vote fritzler
A vote for Fritzler for leading the town because BMQ seems to be concerned with him. Another great piece of thinking.jediknight wrote:Vote Fritzler
He seems to be trying to lead us around by the neck and I just don't like that. And mostly because right now I trust BrianMcQueso and he appears to have a Fritzler concern.
Just because he always does it doesn't make it right. His behavior isn't helping the town. And neither does...Falcone wrote:Voting Fritzler for bandwagoning is not really very productive, because he does it in every single game he's in, regardless of his alignment, and aside from that, I just don't see what he did wrong. He was on the Twomz bandwagon, but as I said before, it would have been more remarkable if he hadn't been, and I'm more suspicious of the people who voted for Twomz after the deadline was set.
Fritzler, I stated a mild accusation against you. I'm not convinced you're scum by any margin. I'm not joking in saying that I find you suspicious. I put my accusation out there not to get a claim out of you, but so that you would defend yourself against it so that I could get a better feel to whether you're pro-town or not. Your claim, regardless of what it is, wouldn't help me too much in figuring out what side you're on. I'm not asking you to reveal your role, I'm asking you to contribute to the discussion. You know,Fritzler wrote:I wasn't going to defend myself, just claim, but uh, just extend what Falcone said.
I don't think you're joking, I've played with you enough to know when you're serious (at least mildly). I'm glad to know its mild and you still <3 me. And if you really want, I'll try and defend myself, and "play the game." W/EBrianMcQueso wrote:Fritzler, I stated a mild accusation against you. I'm not convinced you're scum by any margin. I'm not joking in saying that I find you suspicious. I put my accusation out there not to get a claim out of you, but so that you would defend yourself against it so that I could get a better feel to whether you're pro-town or not. Your claim, regardless of what it is, wouldn't help me too much in figuring out what side you're on. I'm not asking you to reveal your role, I'm asking you to contribute to the discussion. You know,play the game.
Yea, no kidding, I'm getting sick of people actually following my bandwagons. Seriously though, I don't think there's anything more improtant in this game then our role. You're asking me to "BrianMcQueso wrote:This is what's going on in almost all the games on this board, and I'm really getting tired of it. It's no longer "See who looks suspicious, and lynch based on behavior", it's "Bandwagon until we get a claim, decide if we like it, and either lynch or move on to another claim." There's more to this game than what our roles say.
Yea man, Brian don't know what he's talking about man, lay off, this is racism.BrianMcQueso wrote:People who are also voting for Fritzler: take a moment and think about why you're doing so. While I appreciate the sign that you believe in what I'm saying, if you're just following me because it's easy or you want someone to claim that isn't yourself, then you're in the same boat he is.
Damn right get off of that soap box, you think you're better then everyone just because you don't have a gorilla sized wang?BrianMcQueso wrote:[/soapbox]
Honestly, I didn't believe him. Also, I've seen defenses many times (especially on fbgs) where they're all like at one from lynch, oh good job lynching you're docotr, and then pretend they didn't realize it wasn't lynch. I've seen enough of that, that whenever someone tries to defend themselves like that I don't believe it. I'm sorry, I'm a cynic. Plus leaving a doc alive is weird. On one hand, consider if they're telling the truth, probably killed. What happens if they're not killed? You have to play the wifom game to see if the mafia are not killing them to make you suspect them, and I don't really like WIFOM.BrianMcQueso wrote:Looking back over the Twomz lynch yesterday, Fritzler's behavior made me feel funny. His attitude once Twomz had been lynched (but not before day closed) wasn't very protownly. If I had checked in and realized we had lynched a doctor, my reaction would probably be more like Falcone's
than http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=214]Fritzler's[/url]. "You're lynched. Bye buddy." Isn't the remorseful response I'd expect out of a realization that we lynched a valuable power role.
I wish.Fritzler wrote:Damn BMQ making me post, who do you think you are, mith?
The "joking" part was actually addressed to Falcone's comment (post 302). I still love ya, Fritz, I just wish people would talk more.Fritz, cont. wrote:I don't think you're joking, I've played with you enough to know when you're serious (at least mildly). I'm glad to know its mild and you still <3 me. And if you really want, I'll try and defend myself, and "play the game." W/E
I really enjoy that part of the game, too. But when it's theFritz, cont. wrote:I'll tell you, the funnest part of a game for me is uncovering the setup, and our role.
I'm damn proud I don't have a gorilla-sized wang.Fritz, cont. wrote:Damn right get off of that soap box, you think you're better then everyone just because you don't have a gorilla sized wang?
Thanks, that's the kind of posting I'm looking for. 8)Fritz, next post wrote:Honestly, I didn't believe him. Also, I've seen defenses many times blah blah blah etc.
You're right, that was not worded accurately. I tend towards hyperbole I'm afraid (especially when I've just written an essayFalcone wrote:VitaminR, I find it very hard to believe you really think the Fritzler bandwagon "has more reasoning and careful thinking behind it than any of the bandwagons so far".
). I do feel like there is more thought behind it, that is just my impression. I am not going to analyse the votes and assign values, but that was my impression. Maybe it has to do with the way I approached my vote, I don't know. I know it took me a while to make up my mind about this. I know voting for Fritzler because of bandwagoning is not productive. I even stated this earlier in this game during a small day 1 bandwagon on him. I'm voting Fritzler because that's all he's doing! Maybe it's my experience, but I've gotten the impression that despite the bandwagoning there is some focus on finding scum with Fritzler. I haven't seen that so far in this game. Also, although I'm merely repeating my reasons now, he hadn't really responded to the votes on him before my vote.Falcone wrote:Voting Fritzler for bandwagoning is not really very productive, because he does it in every single game he's in, regardless of his alignment, and aside from that, I just don't see what he did wrong. He was on the Twomz bandwagon, but as I said before, it would have been more remarkable if he hadn't been, and I'm more suspicious of the people who voted for Twomz after the deadline was set.
Guys deadline is tomorrow, I guess I'll claim: I am a hacker, an information role. I don't know exactly what I do. Night 1, I hacked into Iammars computer, and found out he targetted no one, so I guess he was a back up or something. Night 2, hacked sineish, but didn't find out info, I think I was roleblocked. It said I got a little drowsy.Dranko20 wrote:Come on guys. This is redictioulous. I'm prodding everyone tonight, and replacing people who don't post tomorrow. Deadline is set for tomorrow and I stand by it. Night will have alot of replacing i think.
I'm still ready to lynch you unless you're partner comes forward.Snap wrote:Well, as the deadlione is tomorrow, I'll claim. I'm a mason cop. I can only talk to my mason partner (who I'll not name unless they want to come forward) up until the point we send off our investigation targets each night. We're more reliable if we both target the same person. Unfortunately, both nights so far I've been caught by an unexpected dawn befroe I could get my target in, so I've got no useful information thus far.