Best of the Internet Mafia: Over!

[W!nt3r]

Vote Count Please

[VisMaior]

Who are you to tell me that...

[W!nt3r]

Who are you to tell me that...

The guy you voted for without explaination, or at least sufficient explaination. That's who I am.

[VisMaior]

Oh, but cant you see I was threatened?

[W!nt3r]

Than you should have a reason to feel as such...

[VisMaior]

Are you threatening me?

Ok I voted because I felt the game is dieing down. Reason enough for me, on day 1.

[W!nt3r]

Thanks. Thats all I wanted...

[VisMaior]

Your welcome.

[W!nt3r]

... you're right... This game has died down considerably...

[elvis_knits]

I am growing suspicious of those detracting from the runups of W!nt3r and/or JechtMurray. Lynching provides good information. Those going off in 500 different ways just don't help in the first couple of Days.

You think scum would really be protecting eachother? Isn't that asking to die if one is lynched and found scummy?

I will not vote for W!nt3r. I would vote for Jecht, if it comes to that, but after my first suspicions, I haven't found much wrong with his play. Maybe he made a good recovery and really is scum, or maybe he was just being a silly townie. Right now, I think inHim is being scummy by trying to peer pressure people into jumping on a bandwagon that they don't agree with. Bandwagons are fine, as far as I'm concerned, but not just to "get information." I say we get information on someone we think is scummy. Namely, inHim

[JechtMurray]

I am growing suspicious of those detracting from the runups of W!nt3r and/or JechtMurray. Lynching provides good information. Those going off in 500 different ways just don't help in the first couple of Days.

You think scum would really be protecting eachother? Isn't that asking to die if one is lynched and found scummy?

I will not vote for W!nt3r. I would vote for Jecht, if it comes to that, but after my first suspicions, I haven't found much wrong with his play. Maybe he made a good recovery and really is scum, or maybe he was just being a silly townie. Right now, I think inHim is being scummy by trying to peer pressure people into jumping on a bandwagon that they don't agree with. Bandwagons are fine, as far as I'm concerned, but not just to "get information." I say we get information on someone we think is scummy. Namely, inHim

I agree. Inhim's tried to bandwagon a few times, and never provided anything other than 'Har! I want to lynch x-person.

He'll probably just unvote W1nt3r and vote me now, but I can deal with that, I seem to be getting used to the attention.

Vote:Inhimshallbe

That's who I feel is most scummy right now.

[inHimshallibe]

I am growing suspicious of those detracting from the runups of W!nt3r and/or JechtMurray. Lynching provides good information. Those going off in 500 different ways just don't help in the first couple of Days.

You think scum would really be protecting eachother? Isn't that asking to die if one is lynched and found scummy?

I will not vote for W!nt3r. I would vote for Jecht, if it comes to that, but after my first suspicions, I haven't found much wrong with his play. Maybe he made a good recovery and really is scum, or maybe he was just being a silly townie. Right now, I think inHim is being scummy by trying to peer pressure people into jumping on a bandwagon that they don't agree with. Bandwagons are fine, as far as I'm concerned, but not just to "get information." I say we get information on someone we think is scummy. Namely, inHim

I agree. Inhim's tried to bandwagon a few times, and never provided anything other than 'Har! I want to lynch x-person.

He'll probably just unvote W1nt3r and vote me now, but I can deal with that, I seem to be getting used to the attention.

Vote:Inhimshallbe

That's who I feel is most scummy right now.

That won't be necessary...

Unvote
Vote: JechtMurray

elvis - I've listed 5 people in the snipped post of mine above. I'll have reason for them to hang no later than the end of today.

You think scum would really be protecting eachother? Isn't that asking to die if one is lynched and found scummy?

I think on Day 1 it is more likely for scum not to vote each other, unless it's just inevitable - like a claimed guilty investigation, and then only one might pile on to the vote. Do you really think that all of Jecht and/or W!nt3r's partners would vote for them?

[elvis_knits]

I agree scum won't vote for eachother until they have to, but they won't defend eachother. Also, if there was a guilty investigation, yes, I could see them all piling on to avoid suspicion.

[W!nt3r]

elvis - I've listed 5 people in the snipped post of mine above. I'll have reason for them to hang no later than the end of today.

What five people do you speak of?

Do you mean end of the game's day or end of Jan. 9?

[inHimshallibe]

The 5 are in my post 191. And, I capitalize "Today" when speaking of the game's Days.

[W!nt3r]

The 5 are in my post 191. And, I capitalize "Today" when speaking of the game's Days.

Thanks.

[W!nt3r]

Here are the people under my suspicion at the moment. I'll go through later and back these up. I won't now because I'm tired.
inHim's mafia picks: JechtMurray, lostprophet, StrykkerVerde
I'm pretty good with bandwagoning: the above 3, W!nt3r, cropcircles
Won't be getting a vote from me Today: Macros

Unvote
Vote: JechtMurray

What is the difference between

The two classifications? This is just for self clearification as I would like to know where you're coming from.

[Commodore Amazing]

unvote: sinister_bunny, vote: JechtMurray

[Commodore Amazing]

Vote Count Please

[PeaceBringer]

vote count would be helpful...

haven't caught up reading wise yet.

[Crola]

Vote Count:

1 TSAGod

(Coron)

7 Commodore Amazing

(Pooky, Strykker, Macros, PeaceBringer, Smilax, Bigbenwd, spamwise)

1 elvis_knits

(Aureal)

1 Cropcircles

(diggy)

1 Lostprophet

(MoS)

7 Jecht

(Nightfall, Cropcircles, Tyfo, HeZLucky, Bamboomancer, Jecht, inhim, CA)

5 w!nt3r

(Sotty, ibaesha, TSAGOD, armlx, VisMajor)

2 inhim

(elvis_knits, Jecht)

0 No Lynch

7 Not Voting

(bethelmark, dranko, roland, sinister_bunny, nonny, W!nt3r, Lostprophet)

17 to lynch. Sorry about the delay guys, I was a little busy.

[JechtMurray]

unvote: sinister_bunny, vote: JechtMurray

There you are again. Why were you voting Sinister Bunny? Why have you suddenly abandoned that idea? I'm still posting even though now that I've got a few votes on me, scum are going to take any opinions as a sign of being scum. I'm not afraid to keep posting, as long as it gets people posting I'll keep at it so more scum can out themselves.

And where the hell are all those lurkers? Why are none of them being mentioned more than a single post? Why has no one been replaced? There are still people with like 2 posts and someone with NO POSTS.

I dread to think how many scum are sitting in the lurker pile not having to say anything other than hopping on either bandwagon.

So how about it people? Lets start talking more than just making hops onto bandwagons.

I think I'm going to do a post history on one or two people. If it's really going to come down to all the scum piling on me as much as possible, I really need to let people know where to look tomorrow.

Stay tuned.

[JechtMurray]

Well, I might as well start with Inhimshall be, he's already trying to bandwagon me so it can't hurt. That much >_<'

Fairly long post

Full Post History- Early game posts

Hmmm... apparently we have something a-rolling.

Works for me Smile.

Vote: Commodore Amazing - Bandwagon, ho! [/thundercats]

Here we have the obligatory vote in the first post. Individually, this post's nothing much to be worried about. Everyone tends to random vote in their first post... except this is on the first bandwagon. Except, considering CA's behavior since the bandwagon and Inhim's aparrent unwillingness to consider CA as a legitimate information bandwagon later on, I'd take this is a token scum buddy vote.

Pfft... CA, I should've known you were good. My apologies.

Unvote
Vote: cropcircles - for his most recent post.

Oops! Quick unvote. Here's another vote, on anyone really. It doesn't really matter.

Now I have the feeling that cropcircles is creating a fake right in front of our very eyes. Let's lynch him!

Err... what? A bit bloodthirsty considering it's 'a feeling'. A nice post to try and derail the (at the time) growing CA bandwagon isn't it? That's 3 posts so far with nothing but "Lynch!" in it.

Notice that these are all before I make my stupid statement, and before I point out his generally useless posts in my monster posts.

Rest of game

elvis_knits wrote:
vote inHim because I find him to be the least helpful at the moment

I'm hurt. I really am.

Let me catch up, and I'll try and be a bit more "helpful."

Here are the people under my suspicion at the moment. I'll go through later and back these up. I won't now because I'm tired.
inHim's mafia picks: JechtMurray, lostprophet, StrykkerVerde
I'm pretty good with bandwagoning: the above 3, W!nt3r, cropcircles
Won't be getting a vote from me Today: Macros

So, Elvis notices that his posts are generally a bit weak. Places a vote on so that maybe some people might notice. *ding!* Perhaps he'd better start posting proper now right?

He said he'd back them up, he hasn't really done so yet. Needing time to make up reasons? He names some people he claims thinks is scum, right, but what's more telling is that there are a couple of people that he wouldn't mind bandwagoning as well. He doesn't actually seem to care who he bandwagons. Cropcircles was an early target for an attempted Wagon, but no one really wanted to go with that.

I am growing suspicious of those detracting from the runups of W!nt3r and/or JechtMurray. Lynching provides good information. Those going off in 500 different ways just don't help in the first couple of Days.

No one's trying to detract from anything. The 'W!nt3r run up' was nothing. He encouraged people to bandwagon him in his own posts. Hardly anyone really thought it was worth a vote.

As for mine, of course

I'm

going to try and put off my lynching. I've posted reasoning behind my actions, and my opinions at every point possible. I'm encouraging posting. With the amount of lurking in this came, I probably shouldn't have said anything about you and just sat back.

But I feel it's in the town's best interests to judge for themselves by my posting and other people's posts. When I make you, for example, start posting more than token posts, people get to see more of you. That hurts no one apart from you because all you do is try to bandwagon, and me because more people will inevitably try to pounce on me.

Incidentaly, why wouldn't you want to try and get a CA information bandwagon? If his claim's as safe as he assumes claims, surely it can't hurt the town any more than you lynching a different townie?

If he's a mason (on of the few easily confirmable roles) then would get a nice confirmed townie and a good place to start working from. If he's another investigator (and found Sinister Bunny guilty, like he may be hinting at with his fairly random vote) then we have a strong doctor target and someone to listen to in the rest of the game.

If he has a fake claim, we might see through it? What's the real reason behind CA not being an option?

[inHimshallibe]

First of all, you won't

make

me start posting in any fashion. I've had quite the time over my winter break to consistently find adequately lengthy periods of time to make the proper posts.

As for why CA not being an option. None of his posts really clue me in to scumminess.

He doesn't actually seem to care who he bandwagons.

This is spin. I specifically listed only 5 people.

To whomever was asking about the difference between my two classifications - the ones I wouldn't mind bandwagoning are people that good information can come from reading into the voting patterns in their lynches, just based upon the interaction I've seen these players have with others.

[JechtMurray]

Eek! Sorry guys, I missed the the last two of Inhim's posts.

That won't be necessary...
I wrote:
Unvote
Vote: JechtMurray


elvis - I've listed 5 people in the snipped post of mine above. I'll have reason for them to hang no later than the end of today.

="ElvisKnitsQuote:
You think scum would really be protecting eachother? Isn't that asking to die if one is lynched and found scummy?

I think on Day 1 it is more likely for scum not to vote each other, unless it's just inevitable - like a claimed guilty investigation, and then only one might pile on to the vote. Do you really think that all of Jecht and/or W!nt3r's partners would vote for them?

And

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:47 pm Post subject:
The 5 are in my post 191. And, I capitalize "Today" when speaking of the game's Days.

And as I've just noticed Inhim posting while I make this one, I'll just respond to that one.