Mafia 125: Khan's Game of Mafia (Game Over)

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1325 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:18 am

I have. There was no point.

SpyreX · Post Post #1326 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:20 am

I have. There was no point.

Whaaaa?

Anti's move makes perfect sense. Trying to catch him in a fake cop because he wouldn't have had a result like he was espousing.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1327 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:43 pm

ok back from AC, lost money....

blah.

havent read this will in the 2-3 days.

Korlash · Post Post #1328 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:32 pm

Anti wrote:I'm a roleblocker. I blocked Seraphim (Xtoxm) last night. When this whole thing started, he game me the impression he got results which I knew was impossible. I guess all I did was make Xtoxm bulletproof.

so instead of pressing him subtly to get him to come clean more you outright give up yourself. Don't see the 'town' reasoning behind that one. but hey, if you think it's town to make huge game changing decisions based solely on an "impression" someone gave you, who am I to judge?

DGB wrote:I have. There was no point.

I think she has you there Anti.

Spy wrote:Anti's move makes perfect sense. Trying to catch him in a fake cop because he wouldn't have had a result like he was espousing.

Yeah because actually making sure the guy claimed "cop" with a "result" first would have been a terrible idea... *rolls eyes* Anti's move makes no sense regardless of his alignment.

Although, I take that bad. it does make sense as scum. If he is a scum goon who actually thought Xtoxm was claiming cop then fakeclaiming to lynch him would seem like a good idea to me. But noooo, scum would never lie to lynch what they thought was a cop... Kinda sad if I'm the only one that at least realizes this...

Antihero · Post Post #1329 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:43 pm

Korlash wrote:Although, I take that bad. it does make sense as scum. If he is a scum goon who actually thought Xtoxm was claiming cop then fakeclaiming to lynch him would seem like a good idea to me. But noooo, scum would never lie to lynch what they thought was a cop... Kinda sad if I'm the only one that at least realizes this...

Are you licking a lead block?

No, scum wouldn't do that since they have an NK.

Korlash wrote:so instead of pressing him subtly to get him to come clean more you outright give up yourself. Don't see the 'town' reasoning behind that one. but hey, if you think it's town to make huge game changing decisions based solely on an "impression" someone gave you, who am I to judge?

KK: Did you give everyone a PR that makes them post like they have a stick up their asses?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1330 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:51 pm

It does "deconfirm" yabbaguy. That's useful for scum.

Antihero · Post Post #1331 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:55 pm

Are you serious? It confirms Xtoxm!

Chevre · Post Post #1332 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:07 pm

Dutch one wrote:@Pokerface, sorry I never answered you about that. I started with pointing out my reads after the nightkills, but it took quite long so I pm'd everything I wrote to myself so I could finish it later. I hope Í'm able to post it today, but I have to walk the entire day with my parents today, so I'm not sure when I've got time for it. But I promise I will post it soon

There are so many instances of subtle Appeal to Emotion in this post it was noticeable. I'm not saying that he lied about what he was doing that day, but I think by specifying exactly what it was instead of saying "I'll be unavailable for the day" was a subconscious way to try to detract suspicion.

Xtoxm's immediate reaction of a vote to Antihero calling him out was very suspicious. It reads as if he'd been seemingly caught, so he retaliated in the harshest way he knew possible.

SpyreX was far too easily pressured by Antihero asking for a vote on either him or Xtoxm. I probably wouldn't have voted either, simply because there was far too little information visible at that time. Xtoxm had said he knew yabbaguy was not dangerous, and Antihero said he was lying.

At first I thought curiouskarmadog's sudden vote on Cyberbob was weird, but then Cyberbob got weirder. It's highly unlikely that asking someone to change how they post is going to merit any success. Also, the majority of the post didn't even have anything to do with the ending vote; therefore, Cyberbob ended up looking considerably edgy.

Kmd4390 wrote:
Unvote, Vote Inhim

This vote change is unsettling. Kmd4390 has been crazily sure that DrippingGoofBall was scum.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1333 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:15 pm

Antihero wrote:Are you serious? It confirms Xtoxm!

No it doesn't if you roleblocked him. How does this confirm xtomx? Am I missing something?

Antihero · Post Post #1334 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:16 pm

Like scum's going to randomly come out of nowhere and go "lol i know yabbaguy isn't scum because i hid behind him"?

DGB, one of us is going to have to die soon, because I can't take this.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1335 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:35 pm

I don't think Xtomx is scum, so I don't understand your post...

Antihero · Post Post #1336 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:48 pm

I don't either. I don't think he is

now

.

What exactly do you not understand here?

Korlash · Post Post #1337 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 4:35 pm

Anti wrote:KK: Did you give everyone a PR that makes them post like they have a stick up their asses?

Do I sense a dash of hostility? A pinch of scorn? A pomme de terre of sissy britches? No "Well Korlash, you see..." No "Agree to disagree." No snappy comeback? not even a witty retort? Just a plain order of malice with a side of fries... A baked bête noire! hash browns of hate! Spiteful spuds!... well fair play to you sir, fair play indeed. If I had a pipe I would smoke it in your general direction. And that pipe would probably be filled with a potato for some reason...

SpyreX · Post Post #1338 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:42 pm

SpyreX was far too easily pressured by Antihero asking for a vote on either him or Xtoxm. I probably wouldn't have voted either, simply because there was far too little information visible at that time. Xtoxm had said he knew yabbaguy was not dangerous, and Antihero said he was lying.

Thats the hallmark beginning of a 1-1. Which is a good thing.

And yes, barring the worst scumpowerteam gambit in a while Anti AND Xtoxm are town.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1339 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:51 pm

Chevre, just because I voted Inhim doesn't mean I suddenly think DGB is town. She is still obvscum and so is Spy.

iamausername · Post Post #1340 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 8:34 pm

Hey, Korlash. Your vote. Where is it?

RedCoyote · Post Post #1341 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:59 pm

Agree with Spy 100% in all things said over the past couple of pages.

Unvote

;

vote: Dutch_one

I don't look forward to another ten pages of debate between Chevre, Dutch, or a PF lynch. We've got firm proponents in all sides, I think.

Korlash · Post Post #1342 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:35 am

iam wrote:Hey, Korlash. Your vote. Where is it?

On spy where it should be. my turn! Your... pocketwatch! where is it?

Boom, point Korlash.

iamausername · Post Post #1343 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:49 am

OK, it just seemed like maybe you'd forgotten, with the way you've been taking all these potshots at Antihero for his claim, while I don't think you've even mentioned Spy for about ten pages.

nocase · Post Post #1344 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:31 am

unvote.

what does everyone think about inhimshallibe?

Antihero · Post Post #1345 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:49 am

Chevre wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:
Unvote, Vote Inhim
This vote change is unsettling. Kmd4390 has been crazily sure that DrippingGoofBall was scum.

Even more unsettling is the fact that he's not the only one who thinks DGB is scum, and yet he still refuses to put his money where his mouth is.

Why was you vote on spy earlier today, again?

nocase wrote:
unvote.

what does everyone think about inhimshallibe?

meh, solid null

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1346 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:16 am

Kmd4390 wrote:Tell me, Inhim. If we lynch Xtoxm and he flips town, would you want to lynch Antihero next? What about Yabba?

Haven't thought that far ahead. His claim sucks, let's lynch him.

I see you voted me later down the page. Awesome.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1347 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:19 am

Xtoxm wrote:The Hider ability.

Feh.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1348 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:20 am

iamausername wrote:No, Antihero's behaviour still doesn't make sense from a scum point of view. His claim was not well thought out, but as a scum roleblocker, he'd know that Xtoxm wasn't lying and figure out how he could still think yabba was innocent despite being blocked. As a town roleblocker, he'd have much more reason to believe that Xtoxm could be lying and newsboy jump in with the counter claim without thinking through all the possibilities.

They're both town. Let's lynch Chevre instead.

VOTE: Chevre

Good posting.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1349 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:26 am

nocase wrote:
unvote.

what does everyone think about inhimshallibe?

Pretty good feller imo. In regards to Xtomx, I was pushing based on his behavior/evasion of topic.

I liked your vote on bob.

Weatherman's solid Town, poking at PF with a stick while everyone else is fixated elsewhere. Let's see here. Chevre calling out Kmd's vote on me without a vote? Or was Chevre already voting Kmd...

unvote