Mafia 44: Generic - Abandoned!

Snap · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:11 pm

I make this vote 7, and we need 9 to lynch, right?

Vote: armlx

logicticus · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:39 pm

Well I am glad that everyone seems to agree with me, but lets stop this bandwagon and let him claim and offer a defense, its only been a couple hours.

armlx · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:37 pm

Ok.

The Don Gaenato vote was logical with what SV said. Then vote SV for lying. More logic. LB had stupid posts at that point that just seemed scummy. The FOS everyone comment was a BabyJ related joke. That just leaves the vote on Twomz and Snap as scummy.

I stand by my statement tho. Any lynch with some logical backing reason is better than a no lynch.

Claim: Basic Townie. Bah. My role PM says something about things maybe changing tho, so I don't know what to think.

BrianMcQueso · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:19 pm

Another quick bandwagon?

I'm not really feeling this one, but I'm not too opposed to it, either. I'd still rather "snap" Fritzler's neck, but at least let's give this one a chance to claim, yea?

Falcone · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:23 pm

Unvote: armlx

I'm 99 percent sure he's innocent.

BrianMcQueso · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:25 pm

P.S. Remind me to read all the pages, including the part where Armlx claims, before saying "let's give him a chance to claim".

Fritzler · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:07 am

BrianMcQueso wrote:Another quick bandwagon?

I'm not really feeling this one, but I'm not too opposed to it, either. I'd still rather "snap" Fritzler's neck, but at least let's give this one a chance to claim, yea?

awww, snap

armlx · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:18 am

Falcone wrote:
Unvote: armlx

I'm 99 percent sure he's innocent.

Thank you.

logicticus · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:43 am

Falcone,

You have additional information? 99% is quite a statement....

chamber · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:25 am

logicticus wrote:Falcone,

You have additional information? 99% is quite a statement....

I have the same question as you.

Falcone · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:15 pm

The way armlx worded his claim makes me almost sure he's telling the truth. I'd prefer not to say any more than that. I really am almost certain he's innocent.

Now, there's already a bunch of the ten people who voted for Twomz yesterday that probably are not mafia, and I'm still convinced that there must have been several scum on that wagon. See Fritzler's post 214 for a survey of the Twomz voters.

vote: Snap

He was the last voter, and he claimed he didn't knew he was last. I don't like that. He hasn't been a shining example of usefulness either, although that can be said of several people here.

BrianMcQueso · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:14 pm

Falcone wrote:The way armlx worded his claim makes me almost sure he's telling the truth. I'd prefer not to say any more than that. I really am almost certain he's innocent.

I'm getting good vibes from this. I'd like to pretend I know what's going on, but I don't. I'm just going to trust Falcone/armlx on this one.

Still happy with my Fritzler vote, though.

VitaminR · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:47 pm

Hmm, 7 votes in a row? What strikes me as odd that five of them were also on the Twomz lynch (only logic and chamber weren't). Also, Shamrock and Snap voted late on both bandwagons and every time with little content. I also think Fritzler's bandwagoning is starting to become slightly exaggerated with a lot of third and/or fourth votes. With that and the comment BMQ picked out, I'm keeping an eye on him.

Falcone is being a bit cryptic, but I'm going to trust him on it for now.

logicticus · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:48 pm

It would be pretty ballsy to protect a fellow scummate in this manner I must say. So I will

unvote

chamber · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:55 pm

unvote vote:snap

For putting the lynching vote on yesterday, and for bandwagonning today.

Fritzler · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:08 pm

unvote, vote: Snap

Don Gaetano · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:59 pm

I understand exactly what Falcone is talking about, and that makes me pretty confident that both him and armlx are pro-town, but not certain.

I'll

unvote

and leave it at that for now.

armlx · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:28 pm

Wow, even townies can clear people. We have 2.5 cleared people now (DG could just be jumping on the "I get it" wagon, but that can be comfirmed later by simply asking why he knows).

I think I'm already voting Snap, but just in case I'm not

Unvote, Vote Snap

.

Falcone · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:29 pm

Mod

, Vote count please?

Snap · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:37 am

When we get a vote count, if there's enough votes on me, I'll claim. I make it 4 at the moment. If people want a claim, I can give them one, but I'm not doing it unless it's totally necessary.

BrianMcQueso · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 3:07 am

People On The Armlx Wagon: Logicticus, Don Gaetano, Chamber, Fritzler, Falcone, Shamrock, Snap

People On The Snap Wagon: Falcone, Chamber, Fritzler, Armlx

Now, this tells me two things. Firstly, we've only got a small portion of the town actually playing, no matter what extent their contribution is. Secondly, we've got the same group of people blindly jumping on both wagons. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't hastily jumping bandwagons while providing little to no explanation why a textbook scummy behavior? Why is this practice acceptable?

FoS: people who would rather jump wagons all day instead of having to think

jediknight · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:29 am

My notification thing appears to be broken on this thrid. It does not tell me when new things are posted.

Vote Fritzler

He seems to be trying to lead us around by the neck and I just don't like that. And mostly because right now I trust BrianMcQueso and he appears to have a Fritzler concern.

Dranko20 · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:02 am

Vote Count:

4 Snap - (armlx, Falcone, chamber, Fritzler)
3 Fritzler - (BrianMcQueso, TSAGod, JediKnight)
2 armlx - (Shamrock, Snap)

Genericly yours, Dranko.

logicticus · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:42 pm

BmQ,

I totally agree. I was definitely alarmed to see Fritzler, chamber and Falcome immediately jump from wagon to wagon. I dont know whats going on here, but there seems to be less analytical thinking and more impulse voting than I really want to see.

Falcone · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:34 pm

So, no trace of secret votes or blocked votes or something at the moment. (That's why I asked for the vote count by the way.)

I'll explain the reasoning behind my last few votes to BMQ and logisticus:

1. I'm convinced that there must have been several scum on the Twomz bandwagon yesterday.
2. Several of them are innocent: myself (obviously), Iammars & LB (because they're dead), armlx, Don Gaetano (less sure about him).
3. Of the remaining people, I think those who voted later are more suspicious than those who voted earlier.
4. I won't vote for someone just because they voted for Twomz yesterday, but if there's other reasons to be suspicious of them, they get my vote.

I think this explains my votes of today: Shamrock (8th on bandwagon), armlx (9th), and Snap (10th). Now I realize this may not be the only method, or even the best method, to catch scum here, but I find there's little else to go on, so this seems like a good way to start.