yabbaguy wrote:Well fuck it, I want to act like a confirmed townie anyway.
Antihero wrote:Kind of hard to do when scum fake investigation results on you.
yabbaguy wrote:Well fuck it, I want to act like a confirmed townie anyway.
Antihero wrote:Kind of hard to do when scum fake investigation results on you.
Uhm exactly whose side are you on? You yell at xtoxm and then attack antihero. Are you actually saying you think they are both scum?RedCoyote wrote:Yeah, because threatening not to read the game if we don't stop suspecting you will really get you town points.Xtoxm 1178 wrote:Being tunneled has just made me kinda apathetic about this game.
Wow, if only you had done this a week ago you could've kept on living your life as a PR (assuming you are) undercover.Xtoxm 1191 wrote:Vote: Antihero
---
This.Korlash 1209 wrote:I'd throw my vote on anti-hero here but it's a dumb situation. We have two people who haven't claimed a damn thing. Unfortunately I think anti needs to elaborate more or the situation needs to be dropped. I don't see that happening so I'll be waiting for Anti-hero.
Kublai Khan wrote:Official Vote Count
Notes/Prods:
- Prodding Gorrad.. (Giving him 24 hours before replacement..)
- Current Deadline: Seeeeecret. {There will be a 3 day warning}
cyberbob, you are misrepresenting what happened....I wasnt empty quoting...I was answering a question...any reason you are presenting it that way or are you just skimming the thread?Cyberbob wrote: - CKD's reaction is incredibly scummy. Emptyquoting a post that said "lynch [xtoxm] on site" then almost immediately backflipping and putting a placeholder vote on someone unrelated? Really?Unvote, Vote: CKD
Oh OK, my bad - it's just that what you quoted was no way anything like a counterclaim so I figured you were intending to answer his question in another post.curiouskarmadog wrote:cyberbob, you are misrepresenting what happened....I wasnt empty quoting...I was answering a question...any reason you are presenting it that way or are you just skimming the thread?
Or you did it once it became clear that general suspicion was on the wane and you wanted to stick it somewhere safe in order to give yourself an easy way back onto one of their wagons if it should come to pass that suspicion starts mounting there again. You know, either or.curiouskarmadog wrote:and I unvoted because I wasnt sure any more that the claim/not claim was scummy...I also wanted to see some questions answered first (Xtoxm needs to answer anti)...I returned my vote to who i think is the most scummy until then...no need to rush anything?
Easy, at the time yours was the most likely fake claim. given a bit of time to think on the situation I was able to see Xtoxm's as slightly more unbelievable, but all in all if this is a "one of them is scum!" think, I would bet it would be you. I can still see the possibility of a town/town fuck up, but if we are going to address it you should be the one to get stuff into the open first. (The worst part of Xtoxm's claiming won't actually be the claim itself, so even going by a logical route he should claim second.) So either way you look at it "balls in your court" I suppose.Antihero wrote:Wait a second, why is the ball in my court? And why is your immediate instinct to throw down a vote on me? Same thing for RC, who followed this up with the weak "this."
Why do I get a bad feeling about you over this...Poker wrote:Anybody that tries to coax him into weak cop or hider, one or the other should be shot. Let xtoxm come forward with the truth on his own and then let anti do the same so we can see who really needs to die.
I found it puzzling. I basically want xtoxm first, then anti, then why weak vs hider matter should we have reason to lynch xtoxm. Other than that I'm not sure why you get a bad feeling. Feel free to think or talk about it /get back to me there. Part of the reason I offered to replace into this game was because you were in it (had other reasons and did want to join a game with The Jester too since I missed both you guys) and ith all the games me and you have played together I actually don't think you have ever voted me outside rvs.Antihero wrote:Which one, hider or weak cop?Xtoxm wrote:Yes. Does it help if I tell you that i'm a Hider (aka Weak Cop)?
And yes, it's extremely important which one you choose.
I dont agree with this....Anti has provide some information and has called out Xtoxm...he then had follow up questions...I think if anti comes out with info, if Xtomx is lying, then it would help him navigate a lie.Korlash wrote: I can still see the possibility of a town/town fuck up, but if we are going to address it you should be the one to get stuff into the open first. (The worst part of Xtoxm's claiming won't actually be the claim itself, so even going by a logical route he should claim second.) So either way you look at it "balls in your court" I suppose.
PokerFace wrote:I kinda disagree with you Korlash. I think xtoxm should go first since his partial came first. And if anti goes first it gives xtoxm room to wiggle into a claim or basically pick something that won't make anti mad as he will be getting notice of what anti has on him prior to xtoxm claiming
I have expressed my suspicion of Chevre...and due to recent posting was suspicious of Xtoxm. If Xtoxm answers dont add up...I would have no problem on being on either fucking wagon..Cyberbob wrote:Or you did it once it became clear that general suspicion was on the wane and you wanted to stick it somewhere safe in order to give yourself an easy way back onto one of their wagons if it should come to pass that suspicion starts mounting there again. You know, either or.curiouskarmadog wrote:and I unvoted because I wasnt sure any more that the claim/not claim was scummy...I also wanted to see some questions answered first (Xtoxm needs to answer anti)...I returned my vote to who i think is the most scummy until then...no need to rush anything?
But you've failed to take note that Xtoxm has no wiggle room. And when you consider how absurd Anti's reaction to it was he is the one that shouldn't be given the option to change his story.Poker wrote:I kinda disagree with you Korlash. I think xtoxm should go first since his partial came first. And if anti goes first it gives xtoxm room to wiggle into a claim or basically pick something that won't make anti mad as he will be getting notice of what anti has on him prior to xtoxm claiming
Are you trying to seduce me Mr. Tucker? No in all seriousness this is the first game I can remember ever getting a bad vibe from you. Could just be my prolonged absence acting up.Poker wrote:I actually don't think you have ever voted me outside rvs.
Seeing as how I think anti is the most likely one lying, and seeing as how Xtoxm is stuck with what he can claim there's no reason not to press anti first. But hey, I wouldn't be caught dead agreeing with me either, doesn't make me wrong.CKD wrote:I dont agree with this....Anti has provide some information and has called out Xtoxm...he then had follow up questions...I think if anti comes out with info, if Xtomx is lying, then it would help him navigate a lie.
I literally can't read this post. Trim those ellipses, form some proper sentences and resubmit.curiouskarmadog wrote:I have expressed my suspicion of Chevre...and due to recent posting was suspicious of Xtoxm. If Xtoxm answers dont add up...I would have no problem on being on either fucking wagon..Cyberbob wrote:Or you did it once it became clear that general suspicion was on the wane and you wanted to stick it somewhere safe in order to give yourself an easy way back onto one of their wagons if it should come to pass that suspicion starts mounting there again. You know, either or.curiouskarmadog wrote:and I unvoted because I wasnt sure any more that the claim/not claim was scummy...I also wanted to see some questions answered first (Xtoxm needs to answer anti)...I returned my vote to who i think is the most scummy until then...no need to rush anything?
bonus scum points for Bob....so let me ask you this..if X or Chevre flip scum...does this affect this post at all? Why are you attacking me for being suspicous of two people that havent flipped yet?...I would understand this type of suspicion if you quoted this days later and both in question flipped town...but an attack like this before we know the alignment of either seems.....scummy...or at least someone in the know..also the fact you misquoted..or misrepresented...misunderstood...or whatever you did in the process also looks scummy.
I would also be okay with some bob pressure.
unvote, vote Cyberbob
oooh look bob, I am leaving myself open to jump on another wagon
are you fucking serious?...that is how you will ignore my vote? if you had to guess bob, what do you think i am saying in that post?Cyberbob wrote:I want to be spending the majority of my time and energy on digesting the actual substance of what someone's saying - not on translation.
*In a DGB accent* well I agree with Korlash because hes sooo smart, and intelligent, and sort of handsome when you turn your head and squint.CKD wrote:also, dgb hasnt jump on in awhile and called me scum...I am missing that. while you are at it, would love your insight on Xtoxm and Anti.