Thor665 wrote:@LMP - I'm not attacking your opinion, I'm just asking clarification of why you think it's a good idea. I've seen town fumble up those sort of black/white things before and so usually I try to go with the attitude around the remarks as more accurate then the actual factual issues in play. Do you not find that functional? I was just curious if you had any relevant results from your play overall.
I'm not really sure what you're asking here Thor. Could you restate the question?
You said that you think that since both you and Ghostlin were challenging each other to produce misspellings that meant that any misspellings that existed weren't intentional, or they wouldn't be making the challenge. I'm just countering that notion with a scenario under which that isn't necessarily true (the "FBI" example). The point is that I can't trust either of you to not be making a bluff out of sheer bravado or an attempt to mask what you might know is actually there.
I looked through Ghostlin's ISO as well. In fact, in his very first post he says something in a joking way about misspellings that made me a bit nervous. But when I weighed each of these things against the entirety of your play, the only one of you two that made sense as the last scum was you.
I was pretty sure you were scum when you nudged me off my palmer read without ever really providing a justification for a "most town" read, brought up the AntB lynch but then bailed on it the first opportunity you got to push us towards DH mislynch, and then lastly when palmer turned out scum all along. Nothing in Ghostlin's play looked anywhere close to as damaging as all that material. As I said in my post "the cherry on top is the Darox misspelling". Humorously it wasn't even intentional. Talk about circumsantial evidence biting you in the ass!