Mafia 125: Khan's Game of Mafia (Game Over)

[curiouskarmadog]

also

vote Xtoxm

?

[SpyreX]

I wanted the answer to that first.

It was important.

Unvote, Vote: Xtoxm

[Antihero]

Why would scum have made such a brazen fakeclaim though when he only had 2 votes on him?

[Xtoxm]

Unvote

What do you think you have on me, Antihero? Your actions here look pretty townly so there's probably an explanation for all this.

Also, I never claimed cop. Don't go jumping to conclusions, people. I simply said that I know Yabbaguy is not dangerous.

[Antihero]

Unvote

What do you think you have on me, Antihero? Your actions here look pretty townly so there's probably an explanation for all this.

Also, I never claimed cop. Don't go jumping to conclusions, people. I simply said that I know Yabbaguy is not dangerous.

How did this information come about?

As a result of an action you took last night?

[Xtoxm]

Yes. Does it help if I tell you that i'm a Hider (aka Weak Cop)?

[DrippingGoofball]

Mmmmmmmmmm yeah.

[DrippingGoofball]

UNVOTE:

[yabbaguy]

Hider's something different, but I'm 99.9% sure he means Weak Cop.

Trying to think- that doesn't sound like a scum claim. If that were actually the case, I could see himself metaphorically running into a wall somewhere down the road running out of pseudo-investigation targets that were innocent.

So I'm, hence, 99.9% sure he's truthing here.

[Korlash]

I'd throw my vote on anti-hero here but it's a dumb situation. We have two people who haven't claimed a damn thing. Unfortunately I think anti needs to elaborate more or the situation needs to be dropped. I don't see that happening so I'll be waiting for Anti-hero.

[Kmd4390]

Xtoxm, why the claim?

[Kmd4390]

And Antihero, does Xtoxm's hider claim affect your info at all? If you still think he's lying, come out with the info.

[Antihero]

Yes. Does it help if I tell you that i'm a Hider (aka Weak Cop)?

Which one, hider or weak cop?

And yes, it's extremely important which one you choose.

[nocase]

ckd's reaction is cool.

[Cyberbob]

I suck. Been getting geared up to go back to uni next week and I just haven't been in the mood for mafia.

I'll try to have something up shortly, it seems ~events~ are taking place at the moment and I want to weigh in.

[iamausername]

Hey, it's /inv 4 and Antihero is me and Xtoxm is roflcopter!

Unvote

VOTE: Xtoxm

Although clearly, claims need elaboration before we actually go to a lynch. But I wasn't the guilty party in that situation.

[Antihero]

Hey, it's /inv 4 and Antihero is me and Xtoxm is roflcopter!

Unvote

VOTE: Xtoxm

Although clearly, claims need elaboration before we actually go to a lynch. But I wasn't the guilty party in that situation.

Link please?

You've been tunneling on me this entire game, and now you're changing your tune because of a vague non-claim?

Explain yourself.

[RedCoyote]

Being tunneled has just made me kinda apathetic about this game.

Yeah, because threatening not to read the game if we don't stop suspecting you will really get you town points.

Vote: Antihero

Wow, if only you had done this a week ago you could've kept on living your life as a PR (assuming you are) undercover.

---

I'd throw my vote on anti-hero here but it's a dumb situation. We have two people who haven't claimed a damn thing. Unfortunately I think anti needs to elaborate more or the situation needs to be dropped. I don't see that happening so I'll be waiting for Anti-hero.

This.

[iamausername]

Link please?

You've been tunneling on me this entire game, and now you're changing your tune because of a vague non-claim?

Explain yourself.

Here.

In brief, roflcopter dropped heavy hints about having an innocent result on Yosarian2, I was a jailkeeper and had targeted rofl on the night in question, but due to the possible roles in the setup, it was still theoretically possible that he could have some kind of result on Yos, though I was pretty sure he was lying scum (and he was). So I gave a vague non-claim in order to force a full-claim out of him and blah blah clusterfuckcakes.

Anyway, your behaviour here makes little to no sense as a scum ploy. It makes perfect sense as a town player who has some maybe sort of incriminating evidence that proves Xtoxm is lying. I know this because it looks a lot like my behaviour in the aforementioned game.

What needs to happen here is a full claim from Xtoxm, followed by a full claim from Antihero.

[Weatherman]

What needs to happen here is a full claim from Xtoxm, followed by a full claim from Antihero.

This.

unvote

[curiouskarmadog]

Yes. Does it help if I tell you that i'm a Hider (aka Weak Cop)?

Which one, hider or weak cop?

And yes, it's extremely important which one you choose.

unvote, vote Chevre

though waiting for this thread to play out.

[curiouskarmadog]

also Xtoxm, if you are a hider...or whatever...why did you want to claim out of no where....and do you see how your claim looked like a cop claim? was that by design or accident?

I agree that is doesnt make sense why Xtoxmscum would do that....but it doesnt make sense why town would either. have a theory why both alignment might do it, but want him to answer first.

[Kublai Khan]

Official Vote Count

Players needed to lynch: 9

"Some people are just born with tragedy in their blood."

- Gretchen (from Donnie Darko)

Xtoxm

- 5 - nocase, inHimshallibe, Antihero, SpyreX, iamausername

Antihero

- 2 - RedCoyote, Cyberbob

Dutch one

- 2 - PokerFace, Chevre

SpyreX

- 2 - Korlash, Kmd4390

Chevre

- 2 - yabbaguy, curiouskarmadog

PokerFace

- 1 - Dutch one

Players not voting:

Xtoxm, DrippingGoofball, Weatherman

Notes/Prods

:
- Prodding Gorrad.. (Giving him 24 hours before replacement..)
- Current Deadline: Seeeeecret. {There will be a 3 day warning}

[Cyberbob]

alright I crashed pretty hard after work so here's a quick dotpoint thing on the last three pages (starting from the top of Page 47):

- The phrase "I'm willing to drop the subject for now" from Weatherman rubs me up the wrong way a little. Not a big thing, just seems a little yeah.
- yabbaguy's accusation of a nocase-Chevre link is off target unless he can come up with examples from their interaction that would make it more likely for them to be scum fake bussing rather than having at least one party be town.
- I seriously don't understand how SpyreX doesn't get the Antihero wagon. It's pretty simple as far as wagons go - even if you don't agree with it.
- yabbaguy's Post 1169 is funny.
- nocase's Post 1170, on the other hand, is an excellent reminder of the Seraphim case.
- I don't like RedCoyote's Post 1174 very much at all. He's not really pushing a definite follow-on lynch particularly hard but it's still pretty skeezy.
- Ugh, xtoxm's claim is

so bad

but I'm inclined to believe it - fuk da wifom. Antihero's reaction is making me lol though.
- +1 to all the calls for Antihero to explain himself, now that he's softclaimed some kind of role information whatever he's going to be a target for scum anyway (yes I am leaning towards believing his position but it doesn't necessarily preclude xtoxm from being town either).
- CKD's reaction is incredibly scummy. Emptyquoting a post that said "lynch [xtoxm] on site" then almost immediately backflipping and putting a placeholder vote on someone unrelated? Really?

Unvote, Vote: CKD

Incidentally Antihero: even if xtoxm was fakeclaiming scum or whatever he's hardly likely to claim any kind of innocent result on a buddy. Scum will almost without exception pull that kind of a thing with a "real" innocent result on someone they know to be town. I'm sure you can see the sense in it.

[Antihero]

I'd throw my vote on anti-hero here but it's a dumb situation. We have two people who haven't claimed a damn thing. Unfortunately I think anti needs to elaborate more or the situation needs to be dropped. I don't see that happening so I'll be waiting for Anti-hero.

Wait a second, why is the ball in my court? And why is your immediate instinct to throw down a vote on me? Same thing for RC, who followed this up with the weak "this."

Xtomx full claims in his next post, then I do the same and tell everyone what I saw. These mixed signals from Xtomx are already disconcerting.

ckd's reaction is cool.

Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why his vote went on Chevre, but w/e.

Incidentally Antihero: even if xtoxm was fakeclaiming scum or whatever he's hardly likely to claim any kind of innocent result on a buddy. Scum will almost without exception pull that kind of a thing with a "real" innocent result on someone they know to be town. I'm sure you can see the sense in it.

I didn't even bring this up. What does this have to do with anything?