268: Bugsy Malone Mafia - Game over. Mod learns lesson

[Pariah]

I usually just look for a likely looking victim person to put a second vote on.

vote: broomhead

Any particular reason or just "Someone should have a second vote?"

Also...chaotic_diablo, are you trying to commit suicide or something?

[broomhead]

i think chaotic_diablo is trying to be... "out there". because if your moves are always weird and unpredicted, no one can really guess your role, and well i guess he sucseded.

[MeMe]

What makes you think that 1) you know why chaotic's doing what he's doing and 2) he's succeeeded?

[broomhead]

1) I am just guessing, thats kinda what this game is all about, guessing about roles and motives, 2) I have a huge problem spelling, and when I run certian word through the spell check, i don't check for content as I should. I'll try to do better next *sniff* I won't disapoint you. *tear roles down cheeck* P.S. yes I know role is suposed to be roll.

[Tamuz]

How many to murder?

I'd like to know that before I continue considering votiing for broomhead. However, Fritzler has been really quiet lately which is very unlike him. I'll keep my vote he is acting wierd by not acting at all.

I apologize for any missing 'I's. my 'I' key is ugly and doesn't like me

[Fritzler]

unvote, vote: chaotic diablo

hi

[chaotic_diablo]

Two can play at that game.

unvote vote Fritzler

[Pariah]

Two can play at that game.

unvote vote Fritzler

So, first you vote for yourself, then you decide to "OMGUS" vote Fritzler.

FoS: CD

[broomhead]

How many to murder?

i think it'll be 7 to murder becasue there's 12 of us(12/2=6. round up to 7)

[broomhead]

Correction: 1 kicked the buckt, so it is now 6 to lynch.

[chaotic_diablo]

Two can play at that game.

unvote vote Fritzler

So, first you vote for yourself, then you decide to "OMGUS" vote Fritzler.

FoS: CD

That's about it, though I don't see how voting for yourself is incriminating.

[Adele]

I'd like to know that before I continue considering votiing for broomhead. However, Fritzler has been really quiet lately which is very unlike him. I'll keep my vote he is acting wierd by not acting at all.

Why are you considering voting for broomhead?
Why did you ask something of your fellow players and not reply to my questions regarding it?

Vote: Tamuz

because (1) you've said hardly anything, and (2) you've expressed willingness to place vote 3 without explaining why you're suspicious, which I've come to believe may be a way for scum to lay a paper-trail:
"See? My vote didn't come outta nowhere! I said ages ago that this was coming!"
And so I think you're the most suspicious guy on the block. Not incredibly scummy, but sufficiently for me to vote.

[vIQleS]

I think I'm going mental.

I posted a vote count earlier today and now I can't see it.

This should be an up-to-date vote count:

broomhead - 2 - MeMe, Talitha
chaotic_diablo - 1 - Friztler
Fritzler - 2 - Tamuz, chaotic_diablo
Tamuz - 1 - Adele

And it is indeed 6 to lynch.

That should be correct - I don't have all my neat automated spreadsheet doofies 'cause I'm doing this from work... (Computer Fubar - long boring story, you don't want to know.)

Adele - I've recorded your vote even though you didn't unvote, but only because your avatar is hot... (And I'm really enjoying www.questionablecontent.com)

[Adele]

sorry for not unvoting .

Glad to hear you're enjoying QC! I recommend it to all.

[Tamuz]

And so Adele I should just tell everyone I'm suspect of every reason I suspect them so they can immediately amend ther behavior and try cutting my suspicion? Is that your strategy. If so I really wish I was scum in this game with you giving me hints on how to act to avoid your suspicion.
This isn't a newbie a third vote isn't even the hint of the smell of the threat of forcing a RC.

Pariah, if I may ask: why only a FOS, you don't currently have a vote on anyone, why not just vote Chaotic instead of just FOS'ing him. he s in no danger of anything. I would like you to explain, if you would be so kind, why you didn't just vote CD there.
I may be back tonight

[broomhead]

Pariah, if I may ask: why only a FOS, you don't currently have a vote on anyone, why not just vote Chaotic instead of just FOS'ing him. He’s in no danger of anything.

Well that’s the main reason for FOS’ing someone, you just want everyone to know what you think and not have people start jumping all around and prematurely voting and killing someone who shouldn't be killed. I like FOS only because I like to sit on the fence till I’m sure of something or just angry. Let’s not pressure anyone to vote before their ready ok?

[chaotic_diablo]

I'd like to know that before I continue considering votiing for broomhead. However, Fritzler has been really quiet lately which is very unlike him. I'll keep my vote he is acting wierd by not acting at all.

Ok, so also I'm going to nebraska on monday, and I will have limited access till tuesday. I get back tuesday night, but leave again wednesday afternoon for no access till the 31st.

There's your answer.

[Adele]

And so Adele I should just tell everyone I'm suspect of every reason I suspect them so they can immediately amend ther behavior and try cutting my suspicion? Is that your strategy. If so I really wish I was scum in this game with you giving me hints on how to act to avoid your suspicion.

You should explain why you're suspicious because you might be wrong, in which case we can argue against it, or you might be right, in which case you may convince us. Withholding in this way is not, to my mind, effective pro-town play.

[Tamuz]

Pariah, if I may ask: why only a FOS, you don't currently have a vote on anyone, why not just vote Chaotic instead of just FOS'ing him. He’s in no danger of anything.

Well that’s the main reason for FOS’ing someone, you just want everyone to know what you think and not have people start jumping all around and prematurely voting and killing someone who shouldn't be killed. I like FOS only because I like to sit on the fence till I’m sure of something or just angry. Let’s not pressure anyone to vote before their ready ok?

Thanks for letting Pariah hide behind your words.

Adele, I'm not forcing you or even tryng to convince anyone to vote for broomhead, I'm not even voting for broomhead, I'm just puttng out that I feel he is slightly more suspcious seeming than the others here. If was trying to get him lynched rather than testing him, and the rest of the town I would be pursuing my avid attack. Examples provided

Tamuzi vs Marioparty: Result scum jumped onto the bandwagon the kd was attacking got lynched. http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &&start=50
Tamuzi vs LyingBrian: Result Got the town with me and nixed the SK. http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=200
There to Here http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtop ... &start=350


The first is a better example of me actually trying to lynch people. I'm not lynching I'm probing.

[N_lich]

Sorry this is my first post.

And so Adele I should just tell everyone I'm suspect of every reason I suspect them so they can immediately amend ther behavior and try cutting my suspicion? Is that your strategy. If so I really wish I was scum in this game with you giving me hints on how to act to avoid your suspicion.

You should explain why you're suspicious because you might be wrong, in which case we can argue against it, or you might be right, in which case you may convince us. Withholding in this way is not, to my mind, effective pro-town play.

I agree with Adele on this (although I admit there may be a few exceptions). I would like to hear why Tamuz was considering voting broomhead.

Vote: Tamuz because (1) you've said hardly anything, and (2) you've expressed willingness to place vote 3 without explaining why you're suspicious, which I've come to believe may be a way for scum to lay a paper-trail:
"See? My vote didn't come outta nowhere! I said ages ago that this was coming!"
And so I think you're the most suspicious guy on the block. Not incredibly scummy, but sufficiently for me to vote.

This is a bit ropier.
point (1) could a: be argued and b: certainly isn't best applied to Tamuz [/whistles innocently ]

Point (2) is something I'd agree with though (see above) but I don't think the fact it's vote 3 makes it look especially bad.

[Foolster41]

Tamuz: You don't have to share everything, and sometimes, I think it is good to be quiet about something suspicous to help build a trap around the scum (as you said, they keep doing the suspicous thing they are doing). But if you vote, then you're drawing attention to the fact that they are suspicous, so it makes no sense to withold info at that point.

[Tamuz]

I haven't voted.... I didn't even FOS, more or less just a IGMEOY

[Foolster41]

Ok. you announced your intentions to vote.

[Talitha]

Any particular reason or just "Someone should have a second vote?"

Just "someone should have a second vote."

Hi all... my attention is flaky right now, but I'm here. Will read carefully soon.

[MeMe]

unvote: broomhead
vote: Pariah