I remember quite a lot of breakage of that preference during the game, but regardless, I didn't properly make the connection this time.
Fate, I know better than to waste my breath on this. I don't know why I was senile back there, but I know you well enough that you're not going to listen to reason - or anything much else - on this. If you want to have this discussion, give me a ring, but now that you've gotten it into your head that I'm scum you're not going to let go of the notion no matter how ridiculous the tell. Even if you
believe
in the tell - from your ramblings it seems that it matters little to you whether or not I forgot who you were or not; you think I'm scum and you don't listen to arguments, only your loquacious self. I came, I saw something that smelled good, I posted. If I could come up with such inventive lies as major amnesia I'd save them for things which wouldn't get you ranting at me in all caps, because I get plenty of that whenever I play with you. Truth is stranger than fiction sometimes, bucko.
Now, onto the people who aren't too stubborn to talk to:
Mari, I was going to ask you whether or not you thought it was likely I'd actually lied, but you addressed that, so I'm just left with you having put your vote on me with the tag 'sheeping Fate' - why'd you put it like that, if you thought it was because I was reaaching (and given that, I can't properly address your issues with me except to say that I've been investigating early issues which sometimes involves poking at things and then weighing if they're significant or not)? Gandalf is at least clear - though Gandalf, I
would
ask you in what way my last post was 'undeniable'. Wait. You think that my #73 was the lie? Uh, can you elaborate, because I don't even. Of that game, I most vividly remembered Fate's semi-spam under his own account, which in my mind made for an unreasonable percentage of posts from there.
AlmasterGM wrote:Katy wrote:Also in reviewing your posting, I don't necessarily take issue with your first post for trying to direct town, I take issue with it as an essentially meaningless post. I always find it suspicious when people post as if they are giving game insight, and then you really look at it and all they are doing is stating the obvious. Which is basically what your first post was.
So let me get this straight - you are voting for me because my first post of the game didn't say anything relevant?
Hellllooooooooo scum in need of an excuse to get on the wagon.
Uh, well, actually saying useless things while trying to mask them as useful insights can be a scum tactic, so I'm not sure why you're strawmanning her point. Especially given that you're voting someone on whom you don't even see a full
case
, only an argument which happens to be worth pretty little.
Gandalf, take a deep breath and turn down the loose cannon, please.
Edge wrote:SO FOR ALL YOU FUCKING FUCKS WHO ARE LIKE "DERP PLUM FORGETTIN YOU IZ FATE IS NULLTELL/WHAT IS SCUM MOTIVATION I DUN GET IT!?!?!?"
THERES NO WAY IN FUCK SHE MISSED THAT POST, AND THEN SHE SHOULDVE WENT "HUH? FATES IN THIS GAME? WHERE?" ORR "FATE? OHHHH EDGE IS FATE THATS RIGHT" ORRR ANYTHING
I
did
. And then I said to myself "I was up until past three in the morning last night, so it'll probably make sense once I've gotten something resmbling a proper night's sleep".
Onto the real work:
AGM, update me on your opinion of SS in the intervening pages according to you and why it's so conclusive you're not touching Gandalf or Katy or anything. Please kthx.
esuriospiritus wrote:quasi-irrelevant peanut gallery-type comments aside, while I still don't buy Fate's 'case' itself, Plum's absence in response to it is telling. 2 posts on the 27th (not counting confirm post), 3 on the 28th, and none today. I find it hard to believe she wouldn't make at least one post today in response to all this as town, rather than resorting to "LURK MOAR AND THE VOTES WILL GO AWAY" mode.
Haven't I pleased with you before? Avatar Mafia or something, right? Maybe I wasn't clear that time that I have a perpetual Sabbath date from Friday afternoon until Saturday evening then, or here, but I have rarely seen such a lame excuse for jumping on a wagon than 'she hasn't posted for almost 30 whole hours, so' . . . so she must be lying about having forgotten that Edge = Fate? So she must be scum lurking? Tested out the waters of my wagon, weren't sure, and then decided to take the plunge in the hopes that it would buy you some credit in Fate/Edge's eyes but you'd already locked yourself into too much ambivalence to join without saying I must be scum lurking?
Gandalf's statements about giving the Ring to a good player over a super-Town player aren't scummy - yet. If his Imbue votes when the going gets serious don't line up with pretty decent Townreads of his, maybe - but I think his point as he stated it is different from the actual practice he'll espouse.
VV, as of right now I do not have a scumread on SS.
