Midnight wrote:Lots of words, lots of walls too I might add >.>, but I don't think there's much meaning in them. Like you're all floundering to get somewhere... >_0
Katsuki wrote:Because that game consisted of giant ESSAYS of text, and had far more pages. I had no hope of ever catching up, and flaking is not something I do.
Reading isn’t a hardship. If either of you don’t want to have to actually stretch yourself I’d suggest a less reading intensive hobby like Lite-Bright or Etch-A-Sketch.
--
Prana obviously needs more votes to properly ‘motivate’ him to play. Let’s get on that people.
@RBT re 176
– Dear god this is all you have to say? Facepalm …
--
Kdub wrote:Magna:
I wasn't accusing Starbuck of being scum, I was more interested to see if she had any actual thoughts on the game.
And why aren’t you interested in our other underachieving posters like bv or RBT?
--
Midnight wrote:Ehh, reading all that's been thrown-up since my last post seems too much like a lot of hot air and not enough... substance I guess the word is?
So the proper response to a lack of substantive content is to throw up fluff as you did in 193? Yeah, that contradictory.
--
DTM wrote:1. RBT's second post on DAY 1 was a MILLAR claim. I wouldn't see a reason to question that tbh since it's still a DAY 1 MILLAR claim. I don't see the reasoning to this question. Answer this after RBT's response: What was the point of that question plz? Were you trying to scum hunting RBT?
The question is part of my feeling out of RBT, in which I get a read on her. So yes, it is part of the scum hunting process.
DTM wrote: LIAR MAN. I will show you how you inferred that Fate was behaving normally.
Oh cute, Rhetoric.
DTM wrote:You were able to IMPLICITLY say that there is a link between Vezok and Fate assuming one person flips scum . You are back tracking by saying the meta link was just an observation for the sake of observation . And that's scummy since you're not scum hunting, you're just stating things for the sake of it without following through, mister "I have nothing to do with this so back off" liar.
You are trying to portray as contradictory my observation that Vezok and Fate may have a link dependant on flips with my disinclination to attack the statement on scummy on its face. It’s not. Should I know engage rhetoric and call you ‘Lying Obv-scum’?
DTM wrote:2. Self presevation is different. Of course people defend themselves. But Ice didn't defend himself from an attack. He just hopped on Fate's good side by joining in the MoI wagon. That's not a town defence. If you're saying that the vote jump was simple self presevation from Fate observing Ice, that has a stronger scum motivation in the form called buddying. A town player would pursue his views without needing that. If he does get attacked I would expect him to defend, and continue scum hunting (i.e. I'm town for XYZ, this guy is scum for ABC, not Let's settle on this guy Fate, K? K.)
Fate said ‘Hey let’s wagon Iec and MoI Reck get on it’. Iec says ‘Well I know I’m town so bandwagon away on MoI’. I don’t see it as damning in the RVS stage of the game.
I’m very curious if Iec is scummy for buddying Fate what you think of the blatant and expected Fate / Reck buddying and Vezok now buddying up to Fate.
DTM wrote:3. No, by meta you're saying that Fate should have been attacking Vezok, not you . That's the whole point of your assocation of Fate/Vezok.
Fate just called you scum because he thinks you're scum.
Emphasis added. I’m glad you know exactly why Fate did what he did.
And how would he think I’m scum? We’ve never played any game together where I was, in fact, scum. So he has no experience of meta of me as scum to draw on. In fact 100% of his experience is MoI-Town. True story. So his motivation is either a personal grudge or just general randomness.
DTM wrote:4. Lulz pressuring is not a scum tell, nice smoke screen to theory man. You just contradicted yourself in this:
I’m just trying to see where you odd thought process is coming from. I certainly haven’t contradicted myself.
I called Prana scummy for his behavior. Obviously adding ZOMG-fluff like ‘Die scum die’ to my statements is what’s called stretching.
He’s still scum. Hasn’t made that ‘catch-up post’ he talked about in his last post, which was classic scum appeasement. If he really thought I was scum he wouldn’t have responded directly to me when I called out his lack of content. Town Prana, IMO, would have said “Screw you scum”. Did he do that? Nope, he hemmed and hawed about his schedule and that he would catch-up later. Regardless how odd his schedule is there has to be some time available for him to scum-hunt.
DTM wrote:Like I said: I'm attacking you because your reasoning to disregard the other votes were weak in comparison to the Prana vote reason (You have an ok reason to attack/vote). But you know what, now you're smoke screening me with theory talk and "pressuring". That's scummy. You're hinting that your scum read is relatively weak. I read it between the lines. You're leaking your motivation in that text.
I think my response to this deep psychological bullshit is best said as such “Cool story bro!”
DTM wrote:I has an avatar nao.
Glad you stuck to your guns on the avatar issue and didn’t cave solely because DGB made you one in another thread.
Nevermind.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
