The case, in a nutshell on Darox:
1) His first set of ISOs are nothing except fawning all over DGB, particularly ISO 1, 2 and 8; Defends her rather insane play on ISO 19.
2) Votes for DGB, Ross, Me in first six votes; yes, one of these is RVS. Did you really think Ross was a VI or are you admitting you were one?
3) ISO 16 is just waffle to insult the players of this game who's play he doesn't like: I think he overused windbag 3x on his personal description of me; he also tries to claim a flavor claim would be useless, considering we were trying to confirm the existence of a hated townie at the time:
"most popular secret agent" is a rolename I would peg as hated townie even without knowledge of the existence of a hated townie. The whole thing is utterly useless in decoding DBG's alignment, and smacks of trying to farm for information to help secure potential future fakeclaims.
...Except if you wanted the absolutely safest fake claim for flavor, you'd just say 'super spy'. This is WIFOMs-que waffle.
4) ISO 22: Why did you vote Xalxe again? Oh, wait, Darox's too cool for reasons.
5) ISO 23 is corrected by ISO 24. I'd mutter scumslip on ISO 23, but that's too obvious. Even though he's teasingly referred himself as scummy on at least more than one occasion on ISO 16. But it doesn't count if he's obviously kidding, right?
6) ISO 25-28: Splits verbal hairs but doesn't even explain why what he's doing isn't hypocritical, espically since he started a wagon on Xalxe WITHOUT posting a reason.
7) ISO 30: Tries to use an inexperience argument to discredit me. (Think of a reverse burden of proficiency here). Yes, it's my first mini-theme, and my third game overall. It shouldn't matter, however.
8) Finally, substance after we pull teeth. He and I have been arguing about five posts. ISO 32 admittedly posts a not bad case about DH. By the way, the previous case he had on DH, the only I could find is a repeat of the stall accusation and the rather dubious accusation on a flavor claim.
9) ISO 33: Still getting his rocks off trying to downplay others accusations by splitting hairs. Really, the most RELEVANT part of the argument as for accusing Vezo was the fact that we had him as primary suspect for 2/3rds of the time Day 1, the fact that he had almost been carried to lynch before we focused on Ross. Who, you did vote for...btw. At the beginning of the day. And later said you didn't support that lynch. Along the same lines as your buddying with DGB. Hrrrrrrmmmmmmm....
10) ISO 34: Actually, have to give Darox credit. He's mined more out of 2 posts and limited reasoning. I'd say it was a fairly decent case except it was like doing a dental to get it.
11) ISO 35: Repeating what's been said and posting ???? isn't as clever as you think it is. You could just simply...point out the contradiction...unless there's something else we're trying to infer?
"You live for the fight when it's all that you've got."--Bon Jovi, Living on a Prayer