Mini 255 - RajÔÇÖs Freaktown I (The Beginning)- GAMEOVER

[halo freak]

Here we go. I found 4 killers on the lose. 2 left their houses to kill. (who was lurking before the end of day 1 and now?) I wasn't able to identify any of the killers.

P.S Raj could you fix all those quote codes, i don't get powers in this section for a few days.

[RangeroftheNorth]

um, halo Freak, Iammars got killed last night.

[halo freak]

I know. *someone skipped parts of my post*

[halo freak]

Ok now I have reached the part where I find out that Iammars is town. Sorry, I know I was against him all last day but at least I wasn’t responsible for his death.

[elvis_knits]

Welcome halo freak!

Here are my thoughts on things right now:

To be honest, I don't know what to do about LB. I'd be fine with voting him, except for the fact that if he really is pro-town, we're screwing ourselves majorly. I find it REALLY suspicious that only two people left their houses to kill last night. It means nobody went to try to kill LyingBrian. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looks bad for LB. (Unless scum counted on this making him look bad, thus setting him up for a lynch).

My second choice for scum is RotN. Let's not forget that his role is ROLAND.

[Don Gaetano]

To be honest, I don't know what to do about LB. I'd be fine with voting him, except for the fact that if he really is pro-town, we're screwing ourselves majorly. I find it REALLY suspicious that only two people left their houses to kill last night. It means nobody went to try to kill LyingBrian. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looks bad for LB. (Unless scum counted on this making him look bad, thus setting him up for a lynch).

Like I've pointed out several times today, any scum who tried to target LB tonight would be idiots. It would be pointless. The fact that he wasn't targeted doesn't make LB more suspicious or less suspicious. It only means that our killers aren't stupid.

[RangeroftheNorth]

sorry halo. You're post was hard to read. I saw the part where you voted Iammars, I didn't notice that second part.

[elvis_knits]

To be honest, I don't know what to do about LB. I'd be fine with voting him, except for the fact that if he really is pro-town, we're screwing ourselves majorly. I find it REALLY suspicious that only two people left their houses to kill last night. It means nobody went to try to kill LyingBrian. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looks bad for LB. (Unless scum counted on this making him look bad, thus setting him up for a lynch).

Like I've pointed out several times today, any scum who tried to target LB tonight would be idiots. It would be pointless. The fact that he wasn't targeted doesn't make LB more suspicious or less suspicious. It only means that our killers aren't stupid.

I thought they might test him. Who knows if he's telling the truth? He could be a lying SK for all I know.

[Don Gaetano]

I thought they might test him. Who knows if he's telling the truth? He could be a lying SK for all I know.

Why would a SK want to test him, and potentially throw their nightkill away? Even if they figured he was most likely lying about his ability, there would be no point in targetting him, as he wouldn't be a problem for them, if he didn't have the ability he claims he has.

It would be as stupid as the witch trials. "If she floats, she's a witch, and if she drowns she's innocent, and you've killed her for no reason"

[elvis_knits]

I'm saying LyingBrian could be an SK. I'm not saying that an SK would want to kill LyingBrian.

Do we really never agree?

[Don Gaetano]

I'm saying LyingBrian could be an SK. I'm not saying that an SK would want to kill LyingBrian.

Then what was the point of your argument?

Do we really never agree?

Doesn't look that way, no

[elvis_knits]

My point is that the

mafia

have no way on knowing if LyingBrian is town or SK, and also can't know if he is lying about his unkillable ability. So they might try to kill him. I mean, unless they are just trusting him, they might try to kill him.

No?

Don...I <3 you, even though we never agree. A relationship need passion, does it not?

[Don Gaetano]

My point is that the mafia have no way on knowing if LyingBrian is town or SK, and also can't know if he is lying about his unkillable ability. So they might try to kill him. I mean, unless they are just trusting him, they might try to kill him.

No?

No, the point is that they would have about a 80-90% chance of killing someone else and only 50% chance of killing LB. And if LB is lying then he isn't dangerous to the scum, and they would know that he might get lynched today anyway. It would be a very bad tactic for the scum to target LB.

Don...I <3 you, even though we never agree. A relationship need passion, does it not?

Si bella, we italians are a bit loud and annoying, but it's because we're a passionate people. Besides, you know I love you

[elvis_knits]

Alex, don't modkill Don G...we're only friends, I swear!

[RangeroftheNorth]

The problem with your arguments is that the mafia don't need to kill LB at night. Any group that has more than one person can just lynch LB in the end game.

[elvis_knits]

That makes sense. [/feels stupid]

[logicticus]

True rotn, but thats if any group has more than one person left at the endgame. More liekly there will end up parts of groups and sks.

I think the most likely killer configg we have is 2 sks and a 2 persosn mafia. In this scenario it would seem that even in the endgame LB would be pretty safe.

One thing that I wonder about is why onely two killers went out last night. What stopped the third one that went out the previous night. Was there a doc or mayybe that person just didnt feel safe making the kill. If that is true (and I admit its the less likely reason), experience shows that the person who was under the most fire the previosu round felt it was best to not make a kill, in this case, LB.

[Chaos]

YAY, another person who suspects RotN!

*hi-five's halo-freak*

[Stewie]

-----
I suggest that everyone who agrees that LyingBrian

seems

to be our best lynch

at the moment

say so in the thread. Remember 50% of us are scum. So in my opinion our best strategy for today is to have a 3/4 majority that agree on who should get lynched .
-----
I'm for lynching LyingBrian at the moment.

Why doesn't everone just write a short post saying if they agree or disagree.

I also think LB is our best lynch for today. He had weird voting patterns yesterday which were not attributed to a posting/voting restriction, today he is dodging questions about his role, and his role does not make any sense to me. If his role is true, then sk can't win, and mafia can only win if they don't lose x-1 players, where x is the total players in the scum group. Seems to overpowered to be true.

[rajrhcpfreak]

P.S Raj could you fix all those quote codes, i don't get powers in this section for a few days.

humm when you get your power you better not be using it.
i i find a post that was edited and i wasnt teh person that edited it.. then im eitehr modkilling you/lose the right to vote/lose night action. theres a good chance taht ill jsut do the last two and make you suffer.

and elvis, you better be happy that you clearified that.

[halo freak]

I guess i should

Unvote Iammars

Only joking, i don't go about editting peoples threads and i operated a strict no editting rule in my games.

[halo freak]

Stewie shouldn't that be, the mafia can only win if they don't lose

more than

x-1 players, where x is the total number of players in the scum group.

What is the point in that statement? Surely it is true in every mafia game.

[elvis_knits]

YAY, another person who suspects RotN!

*hi-five's halo-freak*

I have suspected RotN ever since I heard he was Roland. I'm anti-Ranger.

[halo freak]

So lets lynch him.

Vote Rangerofthenorth

[logicticus]

Bah, I wuold rather see LB get lunched. But Ranger is definitelly second on the scumometer. But I dont by the Roland argument, can you summarize other reasons for his potential scumminesss?