DEFCON Mafia 2.0 - Over, American Victory!

Jack · Post Post #1475 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:29 am

So, lack of a nuke cancel on fate is even more of a scumclaim.

Nuke on inhim should obv be cancelled.

Nuke on snake, eh I'd give spy a higher chance of being scum.

More AV votes please.

DizzyIzzyB13 · Post Post #1476 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:10 am

By the way, you can all die for the sheer amount of caps-locked noise some of you have been flodding this goddamn thread with.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1477 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:35 am

DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:
chesskid3 wrote:THERE IS STILL NO DIZZY IN THIS THREAD
WHAT THE HELL MAN
The day started 24 hours ago. There is no need to be so over-reactive based on such a short period without posting. This is mildly suspicious.

Anyway. Hi everyone. I need to finish my read throughbefore I come to any definitive conclusions, so if there's anything in particular you guys want comment on, or for me to look at, now would be a good time to ask stuff.

yes go type in thread "nuke: chesskid"
don't bother rereading

chesskid3 · Post Post #1478 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:36 am

AurorusVox wrote:=_=" Chess, I'm not saying don't have Dizzy lynched. My point is that we don't need to sacrifice the lynch that people want (and the biggest wagon was on Dana) to satisfy your tunnel-lynch when we have day vigs around.

k then someone nuke.
I don't have one, so all I can do is try to make him nuke me.
so CAN SOMEONE NUKE PLEASE THANKSSSSSSSSSSSS

SpyreX · Post Post #1479 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:43 am

Well that's me about to get incinerated then... For the record I'm deploying Fighters and thus far I have Reconn'd Fate who has is a missile silo and Chess who is defensively deploying. If no abort is hit, then lynch Fate and SpyreX

This many alive and you managed to pick two targets who as of this post had posted what they've done?

NOICE.

SnakePlissken · Post Post #1480 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:02 am

That doesn't stop you from being scum though does it?

chesskid3 · Post Post #1481 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:11 am

wait
failsafe
is not
defensive deployment
no?
lyingscum?

SpyreX · Post Post #1482 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:14 am

Yes its passive = defensive.

Doesn't change anything.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1483 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 am

Dana is town btw.
And sure snake might be scum
but BS/bobsnox/DIZZY need to dieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Fate · Post Post #1484 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:04 am

wait a seconddddddddddd

IM GOING TO LIVE???????????

IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING INHIMZ???

Fate · Post Post #1485 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:06 am

BWHAHAHAHA
A

AA
AHAHAAAAAAAAAA

SNAKES CLAIM BTW MAKES ME LULZ. HE ROLE COPPED THE CLAIMED FAILSAFE?

LOL.
WUT.

HE CLAIMED THINGS THAT ARE ALREADY OBVIOUS IN THREAD?

HE SAID ME AND SPYREX SHOULD DIE IF THE NUKE ISNT CANCELLED LOL EMPTYTHREAT/NOLOGIC??

Fate · Post Post #1486 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:13 am

BTW THIS COOL N NIFTY RIDIN JACKS COATTAILS ON THE AV WAGON IS FINE AND NICE BUT:

1. ITS COUNTER TO MY DANASCUM WAGON OF JUSTICE.
2. I HAVENT SEEN ANY ACTUAL CASE ON AV THUS FAR AND NOT SURE WUT IS UP
3. WHEN I READ HIS POSTS I GET THAT VIBE WHICH SHALL NOT BE DISCUSSED AND NAMED BUT IT ISNT SCUMMY JUST CALCULATING TOWN GETTING THEIR READS

Fate · Post Post #1487 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:14 am

PERCY IN PARTICULAR ID EXPECT A CASE OF SOME SORT OUT OF CONSIDERING HE MENTIONS AV AS HIS TOP SUSPECT??

Katsuki · Post Post #1488 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:18 am

THIS IS RIDICULOUS

FATE IS NOT TOWN THIS GAME

YOU GUYS CAN WEEP WHEN HE FLIPS SCUM BECAUSE HE WILL

Fate · Post Post #1489 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:18 am

HAHA

TRAP SPRUNG SCUMBAG

TRAP SPRUNG

Fate · Post Post #1490 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:36 am

I SAID TRAP SPRUNG.

U SAY "wha what?:???"

I SAY:

"THERE'S SOMETHING MISSING IN YOUR LAST POST, AKA WHY YOU ARE 100% SCUM"

YOUR TURN

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1491 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:22 am

Mr. Path, would you kahndly recall your weapon of destruction. It is headed to the most undesahrable of conclusions.

danakillsu · Post Post #1492 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:33 am

Fate wrote:I SAID TRAP SPRUNG.

U SAY "wha what?:???"

I SAY:

"THERE'S SOMETHING MISSING IN YOUR LAST POST, AKA WHY YOU ARE 100% SCUM"

YOUR TURN

I'm not finding this. I think it's a little weird he thinks we'll all weep when you flip scum, but calling everyone at the same time scum accidentally is not a scumtell...

chesskid3 · Post Post #1493 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:43 am

DIZZY STILL NOT NUKED
THE FUCK MAN?

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1494 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 am

danakillsu wrote:
Fate wrote:I SAID TRAP SPRUNG.

U SAY "wha what?:???"

I SAY:

"THERE'S SOMETHING MISSING IN YOUR LAST POST, AKA WHY YOU ARE 100% SCUM"

YOUR TURN
I'm not finding this. I think it's a little weird he thinks we'll all weep when you flip scum, but calling everyone at the same time scum accidentally is not a scumtell...

Oh my.

SocioPath · Post Post #1495 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:39 am

inHimshallibe wrote:Mr. Path, would you kahndly recall your weapon of destruction. It is headed to the most undesahrable of conclusions.

I'm sorry sir, I cannot do that.

Jack · Post Post #1496 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:42 am

SocioPath wrote:
inHimshallibe wrote:Mr. Path, would you kahndly recall your weapon of destruction. It is headed to the most undesahrable of conclusions.
I'm sorry sir, I cannot do that.

Why on earth not? He can be nuked or lynched later if he's scummy.

Do you think fate is scum? If not, why do you think scum would protect someone other than a buddy with battleship?

Jack · Post Post #1497 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:45 am

Socio why is bob "not worth the time"?

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1498 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:55 am

SocioPath wrote:
inHimshallibe wrote:Mr. Path, would you kahndly recall your weapon of destruction. It is headed to the most undesahrable of conclusions.
I'm sorry sir, I cannot do that.

I'm sure you can. You can get that nice DJ you had helping you earlier to break it down.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #1499 (ISO) » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am

SocioPath wrote:
inHimshallibe wrote:what is the most glaring inclusion on my list?
Your response to Fate concerning Jack, considering Jack's placement on your list.

This is you not thinking clearly. I am OK WITH: Jack because other people are OK WITH: Jack and I do not do a good job of reading Jack. To be more specific, I always tend to read him as scum.