PoisonIvy, 330 wrote: Xvart
Yah you clear it up but you still hold your vote on Guderian who has been vocally curious about the rooms and mechanics, and i have to say so am i. But this imho does not warrant a vote. PS. You've never seen a wagon gain rapid velocity after a few running votes? My "SENSATIONALISM
" Comes from the fact i'd rather not see him lynched atm so FUUUUU.
Among other things that I am suspicious of Guderian for. You never answered if you didn't read my post when accusing me of something I had already detailed out why I withdrew that suspicion. And great, you would rather not see a wagon on him. Apparently at the time six people disagreed so FUUUUU. I'm not going to change my vocality because you think Guderian has been exhibiting some undescribed obv town tells.
It's also funny that you and Guderian are so curious about other people and their possible room movement when you two have been the most active (I think) in moving rooms.
PoisonIvy, 330 wrote:Re: bussing = interenational symbol for scum, maybe i didnt phrase that right. I was in a game a while ago where everyone more or less stuck to Mafia theory and if person A done this and flipped scum the person G was scum because they voted person A RVS. And just a loada shite i really dont want to revive this game.
Again, great. I hope that works out for you. How did whatever game you are talking about turn out?
I'll also note you say something later in the post about evading questions being scummy when you did not answer my one specific question to you.
mikeburnfire wrote:Bad news guys. There aren't any restrooms on this ship.
I've just been taking a slash off the side of the ship. Hope that is okay with everyone.
PoisonIvy, 339 wrote:lol. firstly. Yay((scanner))!! and rofl. at MBF. What if you have an en suite though?
Secondly. Xvart. Please tell me you are not anti town? The fact you have a weapon does not necessarily mean you are anti town im assuming. Nor does it necessarily mean you has killed yet. As you said earlier, you did not kill Internet Stranger or AlmasterGM. Im willing to be proved wrong however.
Im still however happy with my Katsuki vote. I think your scum. Why push me to say why i think chesskid3 is town? Its an opinion. Nothing more, nothing less. Your refusal to answer why you were pushing this is scummy. You will not give any attempt at a response instead you are just trying to sweep me under the carpet. No?
Super scummy post. Please tell you I am not anti-town? What does that even mean and what do you expect me to say? Under your assumption that I have a weapon would that include being town with a weapon and killing someone town aligned when I was trying to kill someone scum? And way to straddle the fence on me and the IS/Alamaster kills. I obviously didn't kill Alamaster or else I would have claimed it, as has already been said whoever did it would get some serious town points by claiming it (unless there is some notoriety town benefit to not claiming which I don't think but haven't thought too much about).
Midnight's Sorrow, 343 wrote:Because, you know, he might have just started with an item or picked up one during the course of the game...
Well, truth be told, I haven't left the lobby as all my posting has been here and you haven't seen a "xvart has entered the lobby." So since I scanned "yes" from an outsider perspective I either started with an item/weapon, picked one up somewhere, or I cooked one up somewhere along the way; in this case the second two are ruled out (unless I'm some sort of inventor or variant).
In not-so full disclosure I will confirm that I do have at least one item, at least one weapon, or some combination of the two; so Gud's scanner does work as he describes it.
Mr. Flay, 344 wrote:Ivy: Why do you think xvart has a weapon? Reread Guderian's post again; he said the scanner detects items, whether they are killing weapons or not.
I read it as it scans for items and/or weapons (but I agree that there is some punctuation confusion), as if someone had another scanner and they scanned Gud he would yield a positive "yes" even if he doesn't have a weapon. And thanks for the info on Smalltown setup.
PoisonIvy, 349 wrote:Big whoops on my part. Admittedly i did not read that right. Apologies xvart.
No worries. The good thing that came of it is I now know you are more interested in weapons and killing as opposed to items. Are you worried that I'm going to kill one of your buddies?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: PoisonIvy
