Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Vi]

@H

- In light of 1749, I'm assuming you think AH is scum?

Don't understand point of chamber's questions.

Fonz's recent posts add nothing.

[Vi]

Also, this game is ~*~awesome~*~ for my Posts Per Day. :emote:

[chamber]

The point of my questions is that I can't believe how incredibly scummy AV is being but I'm trying REALLY hard to see him as town. REALLY hard, I sware.

[AurorusVox]

Fonz: I support it when it happens, which is mostly on another site (EpicMafia). It's chat based, so no history to link you to.

[AurorusVox]

On this site, I've used a claimed VT to my advantage as scum in this game; scroll down to ThePerson and you'll see me mention that.

[AurorusVox]

Followed through with it here too against someone who claimed Vengeful Townie then retracted it (focus on preventing the outing of PRs with alternative wagons).

Removed link. ~~NS

[AurorusVox]

^was town in that game. Plus it's an issue that has been raised in an on-going game (twice).

[Tasky]

Everybody read this please.
Now, AV: are you voting for RF because you find him suspicious or because he claimed VT?

Link removed.

Tasky, you are dangerously close to my one remaining viable nerve.

[Vi]

Tasky, just checking, but do you even know what it takes to get modkilled on this site?

[chamber]

AV's the one that linked that game. No where near worth a modkill

[Vi]

Oh.
The fact that AV is dead & Tasky isn't in that game makes it a little better but still.

[AurorusVox]

I assumed it would be okay because I wasn't alive in it anymore? :S

[AurorusVox]

Tasky: I see where you're going with this and I'm going to stop you right there. Asking for clarification does not involve judgement.

[AurorusVox]

I simply needed to see what his motives were. In fact in the link that I posted, I made it clear that I supported LACVT purely on a VT claim basis anyway.

[AurorusVox]

As for the question: I'm voting him mostly for LACVT on the basis of the claim, and also because the claim came early (somewhat suspicious).

[Vi]

We'll discuss the rules later. For now I'd really rather you NOT get modsmacked, so etc.

[Nobody Special]

I didn't think I'd need to say this, especially with this playerlist, but:

DO NOT LINK TO or discuss ongoing games. Either on OR OFF of this site.

[RayFrost]

t'was a srs question, that all you're going to say?

[RayFrost]

Didn't say that, now did I? I said

when in a game from the start

I do worse than when replacing in as fuel from the get go is less - nothing to do with how long the game is later. Also, I've seen longer. 80+ pages.

[RayFrost]

ctd from above - I find it easier to get in gear when I have to read to catc up in a game I haven't been in as I'm doing a full read without any emotional attachment and such to previous posting (as I wasn't in the game)

[RayFrost]

(ctd) There's no "I understand what I meant" to go with being attacked as I wasn't in the game, so I can analyze people without having been in the arguments in question.

[RayFrost]

In contrast, I'm in arguments that I'm reading when in the game from the start - there's no point where I'm outside the game and can have an even semi-objective viewpoint.

[RayFrost]

So... you agreeing with my case or do you have some other tells you'd like to bring up?

[RayFrost]

To reply to the irony thing: I never said my early play was good. It doesn't shine well either. *shrug* Nothing I can do about that except do better. That said, I can still call people out on it.

[RayFrost]

Heya Fonzy, got anything to add about your reads, or has nothing new happened?