Mini 1087 - The Dresden Files Game Over!

[smargaret]

Hey DP. If you were actually a dayvig, how would you use your kill?

Isn't this essentially the same question you voted me for asking? And I know you didn't address this to me, but Fate is playing not-Fate-like and while I'm sorry he's dealing with stuff, I'm okay with his play because I don't like people assuming control of the town. I'm not entirely sure how he managed to confuse me with Mariyta, though (which is currently my biggest problem with him, but it's a fairly minor one). Abbreviate my name however you want, most people seem to go for smar.

If nobody pushes anyone to answer questions, then scum could ignore anything they wanted. It's not enough to push someone to a lynch, however DP did massively confuse the game by fake-daykilling and hasn't contributed anything to the game since. I think that is more than enough justification for a single vote in the first five pages of the game.

@ Mari: Yeah, I can't think what role I'd give to my favorite.

[Oopidstay]

FoS: smargaret

Because one wasn't enough, but I'm not ready to move my Fitz vote yet.

[smargaret]

Oop, did I miss something, or do you just not like my posts?

[Oopidstay]

Oop, did I miss something, or do you just not like my posts?

That, although the reason I don't like your posts is because they seem scummy. To elucidate on my most recent FoS, you were slinging mud on Antihero and justifying a bad DP vote.

[LimMePls]

Pretty sure we can't go wrong with lynching fitz or smargaret today. I'd really like some comments on my thoughts on CityOfAs, particularly from COA.

[smargaret]

If I get lynched today on a gut read, I will be very angry. And I hold grudges. (this is for essentially the same reason Mariyta would have been angry to die on page 2 - Dresden Files are some of my favorite books)

LMP, which post are you referring to?

[Fate]

VOTE: Fate

I made a content post and you don't even comment on why it makes me scummier.

This is a pretty meh vote Anti.

[Antihero]

Completely not comparable. Would you like to try again?

Also, weren't you just calling Mari down for buddying?

[CityofAs]

Sorry for not posting much, I usually can only post once a day and yesterday I had too much homework.

@havingfits: obv random is weird. why try so hard to make a random vote? Looks like trying too hard to blend in.

It's called sarcasm. I use it ocassionally. We aren't in RVS anymore are we?

UNVOTE:

scum can use sarcasm too. What I'm saying is that your vote appeared to me as being scum motivation masked by town sarcasm.

Why do I get the feeling that everyone in this game knows someone else in the game except for me? And why do I get the feeling is going to be an extra big headache to follow because of that.

VOTE: Zdenek

I don't know anyone either (this is only my 3rd game on the site...). What are your reasons for voting Zednek?

Pretty sure we can't go wrong with lynching fitz or smargaret today. I'd really like some comments on my thoughts on CityOfAs, particularly from COA.

I think this is your only post concerning me (correct me if I am wrong):

Blargh! First time I ever self vote, attempting to reaction fish, and I get ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Pretty hilarious.

Unvote
Vote: CityOfA

For expressing pretty good suspicion of havingfitz in 93 followed by vote on Smargaret in 94, when a vote on fitz would have been MUCH better. Something doesn't smell right to me there.

Why do you think a vote on fitz is better? And if so, why did you never vote for fitz? In post #119 and 154, you say that smargaret is a high scum suspect. So why is me voting for her scummy? IMO I had a slightly better case on her than on fitz.

Pretty sure we can't go wrong with lynching fitz or smargaret today.

Why are you voting me then?

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

I never said it was random.

Help me understand your vote, then, please?

Why do I get the feeling that everyone in this game knows someone else in the game except for me? And why do I get the feeling is going to be an extra big headache to follow because of that.

VOTE: Zdenek

I don't know anyone either (this is only my 3rd game on the site...). What are your reasons for voting Zednek?

If I wanted to give reasons or make clear to others why I voted the way I did I would've done so with my initial post.

[smargaret]

If I wanted to give reasons or make clear to others why I voted the way I did I would've done so with my initial post.

Withholding reasons like that is anti-town. It's day 1 so it's not like you're a cop trying to avoid a claim; there is no pro-town reason right now not to explain your vote.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

If I wanted to give reasons or make clear to others why I voted the way I did I would've done so with my initial post.

Withholding reasons like that is anti-town. It's day 1 so it's not like you're a cop trying to avoid a claim; there is no pro-town reason right now not to explain your vote.

That's one of the most asinine and simplistic things I've read in a good long while; thanks for the laugh.

[smargaret]

So then what is the pro-town reason for refusing to state a reason for a vote?

[Zdenek]

CityofAs, I still want to know what is scummy about wagonning. Do you think that smarg's bandwagon vote on Fate is the only scummy thing she's done? What about HavingFitz, is his random vote at the start of the game the only scummy thing you thinks he's done?

[Mariyta]

If I wanted to give reasons or make clear to others why I voted the way I did I would've done so with my initial post.

Withholding reasons like that is anti-town. It's day 1 so it's not like you're a cop trying to avoid a claim; there is no pro-town reason right now not to explain your vote.

That's one of the most asinine and simplistic things I've read in a good long while; thanks for the laugh.

I agree with smarg, and insulting her only makes you look childish. There is absolutely no reason at this point to not give a reason for a vote. As I've said before, if you don't want people to ask for a reason, then be more subtle. Voting w/o giving a reason is a) begging for someone to ask for a reason; or b) arrogant, if you assume you're so much better than everyone else that giving reasons is beneath you.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

First off, I didn't insult her; I belittled her argument which deserved the mockery bestowed upon it. And second, there are plenty of reasons not to give a reason on a vote and I think it suggests either a major lack of creativity to suggest there are no reasons to do what I did or a willful denial of the possibilities as to slander me.

[smargaret]

Okay, I have a major lack of creativity. Enlighten me, please.

[Zdenek]

In case no one else has mentioned it yet, Fitz' unvote in his ISO 6 is a good example of appeasement.

[Antihero]

Okay, I have a major lack of creativity. Enlighten me, please.

Red

Green herring

has been sighted. DDD is acting like an asshole to marge, but he's voting for scum, so I don't have a problem with him.

(Mod: ^This is dark red, but if that still violates your rules, please feel free to change it)

In case no one else has mentioned it yet, Fitz' unvote in his ISO 6 is a good example of appeasement.

Way to pile onto havingfitz without actually voting.

[Zdenek]

Way to pile onto havingfitz without actually voting.

I'm still happy with my vote on CityofAs.

[Oopidstay]

@ Anti: What is your stance on Fate and Fitz? (Yes, I know you're voting Fate.) Also, where's the Zed displeasure coming from all of a sudden?

[Antihero]

@ Anti: What is your stance on Fate and Fitz?

Fate's push on Mari seems forced to me, that's why I think he's scum (plus the buddying hypocrisy).
As the object of crap flings, I would guess fitz is town.

Also, where's the Zed displeasure coming from all of a sudden?

His last post really pinged on the scumdar. Just look at it; it's exactly how I described it: piling onto havingfitz and fueling the suspicion without actually having to get onto the wagon. If Z were really sincere about this, I think he would follow this observation up with something that matters: a vote.

Also, look back at his ISO: a bunch of questions without follow ups (classic scum move) and an aweful vote on CA.

Thinking on, this is a much better place for my vote.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Zdenek

[Zdenek]

My questions to DP and Maryita were answered, and saw nothing particularly wrong with the responses. I have followed up with my question to CityofAs which he didn't answer.

I'm keeping my vote on CoA because I see no reason to remove it based on his play.

[Antihero]

My questions to DP and Maryita were answered, and saw nothing particularly wrong with the responses. I have followed up with my question to CityofAs which he didn't answer.

OK, great, but the entirety of your content have been questions. Questions that somehow lead to a conclusion of CA being scum for the reason of...

I'm keeping my vote on CoA because I see no reason to remove it based on his play.

Whatever; I guess the only other thing worth commenting on is havingfitz's play (who's taking a considerable amount of heat... how convenient).

[Oopidstay]

As the object of crap flings, I would guess fitz is town.

The "object" of crap flings? Town? Please explain this, as I vehemently disagree with both of those stances.