Mini #1081 - SitMOA Mafia (Endgame... Congrats, winners!)

[andrew94]

fm1 WHY DOES everyone have SO much abilities.

p.s. LET me HAMMER if you're gonna lynch somebody

[gandalf5166]

*FUCKINGHEADDESK*

You haven't answered the most important point, about the nature of the JK.

[chesskid3]

I think if he were going to fakeclaim he wouldn't have done that, that's my point.

Also JK > doc. hit a scumster with it, use it as a RB

[andrew94]

CAN STOP TALKING ABOUT ABILITIES, ANYONE CAN FAKECLAIM EASILY, OR MOD PROVIDES FAKECLAIMS.

[gandalf5166]

Okay. Why would you want to protect scum, when a vig might be targeting them that night? And not to mention, the scummy ones aren't going to be performing the kills, for just that reason.


Yeah, fakeclaims are easy. That's how you tell them apart, they're too easy. I mean, SERIOUSLY? SHIELD? I swear.

[Dark Horse]

Sorry, been busy.

I don't believe malt's claim. "Shield"? Seriously?

[Narsis]

Sorry, been busy.

I don't believe malt's claim. "Shield"? Seriously?

copying gandalf's case exactly doesn't really mean much you know.

[gandalf5166]

Yeah, DH is your buddy, don't worry. We already have that down. You don't need to make lame attempts at bussing for us to figure it out. Is malth your scumbuddy too? Or is he TP? If you answer, I'll give you a cookie.

[Narsis]

Yeah, DH is your buddy, don't worry. We already have that down. You don't need to make lame attempts at bussing for us to figure it out. Is malth your scumbuddy too? Or is he TP? If you answer, I'll give you a cookie.

he's not my buddy. dont know if he is TP or not though.

[gandalf5166]

Lolol. You actually answered. Do you like eCookies? Or do you want to rent a PO box so I can send you some?

[Narsis]

Lolol. You actually answered. Do you like eCookies? Or do you want to rent a PO box so I can send you some?

just send me a picture of a nice cookie.

[gandalf5166]

I made a bunch, so share with the rest of class.

[Doombunny9]

NARSIS YOU'D BETTER SHARE WITH ME!!!

On topic: I don't know almost anything about D&D so might sound pretty fucking n00bish but whats wrong with malts shield claim?

[gandalf5166]

Nothing, other than the fact that if I knew nothing about D&D and was making a fakeclaim for doc, it's almost certainly what I'd use.

[AdumbroDeus]

Narsis reads as scum that's essentially giving up right now.

AdumbroDeus: A few things strike me as odd about his play and posts so far.

He seems to be really focused on asking people for scum/town lists hunches, and it makes me think he's trying to blend to the background by simply larking the general consensus. His general view of the game list (ISO post #3) is mostly general stuff that the town in general believes (except an opinion about Katsuki, see below). His 3 stances are mainly talking about the RVS (pointless), defending himself, and bullying his points to get people to spout suspicion lists.

As well, I have gut feeling that Katsuki, but the fact that's he's posted so little that isn't fluff makes hard to find any evidence.

Vote AdubroDeus

So, care to give an actual case if you think I'm scum.

Cause this case is entirely built on a combination of neutral, pro-town, and anti-town actions that you've read with a scummy intent (the anti-town obviously being the lurking, which is beyond my control and exists in every game I'm in currently, as well as being announced Feel free to confirm this by reading my other mafiascum and smashboards games). Yes, I could be trying to get suspicion lists to lurk consensus so I could survive, but at the same time I could be trying to build records of people's stances and force people to take stances so we can analyze those stances both now and later.


We're well beyond lurker lynches, especially lurker lynches with a legit reason for lurking, unless we process of elimination everyone else out.

The rules won't let scum kill their scumbuddies, silly.

Care to explain this?






Still catching up btw.

[ThAdmiral]

Nothing, other than the fact that if I knew nothing about D&D and was making a fakeclaim for doc, it's almost certainly what I'd use.

I disagree. If I knew nothing I would probably go something like "heal".

[gandalf5166]

The rules won't let scum kill their scumbuddies, silly.

Someone asked the scum to kill andrew. I said that they couldn't because andrew was scum, and scum can't kill themselves. Simple really.

Nothing, other than the fact that if I knew nothing about D&D and was making a fakeclaim for doc, it's almost certainly what I'd use.

I disagree. If I knew nothing I would probably go something like "heal".

Not really. Heal would be saving them AFTER they were hurt, not protecting them from being hurt. Although you're right in that they might go either way.

[AdumbroDeus]

The rules won't let scum kill their scumbuddies, silly.

Someone asked the scum to kill andrew. I said that they couldn't because andrew was scum, and scum can't kill themselves. Simple really.

Where?

I can see why scum would not WANT to kill other scum, but not being able to, I see no rule against that.

[chesskid3]

"We're well beyond lurker lynches, especially lurker lynches with a legit reason for lurking, unless we process of elimination everyone else out"
This is a really subtle defense of Katsuki. I don't like it.

[gandalf5166]

The rules won't let scum kill their scumbuddies, silly.

Someone asked the scum to kill andrew. I said that they couldn't because andrew was scum, and scum can't kill themselves. Simple really.

Where?

I can see why scum would not WANT to kill other scum, but not being able to, I see no rule against that.

Oh. It's in most rulesets, I just assumed that it was in this one too.

[AdumbroDeus]

"We're well beyond lurker lynches, especially lurker lynches with a legit reason for lurking, unless we process of elimination everyone else out"
This is a really subtle defense of Katsuki. I don't like it.

Wait, you're pushing for Katsuki and you don't have anything more then he's lurking?


If that's true, then yes, I wouldn't support a katsuki lynch unless there are no stronger targets because it would be bad policy. I would support pushing him for stances and lynching him if he resists giving stances, but inactivity in and of itself isn't a reason to lynch except in exceptional circumstances, almost always better targets.

[Narsis]

Narsis reads as scum that's essentially giving up right now.

or just a player that has given up?

[malthusis]

Nothing, other than the fact that if I knew nothing about D&D and was making a fakeclaim for doc, it's almost certainly what I'd use.

I disagree. If I knew nothing I would probably go something like "heal".

I'd lynch you immediately if you claimed that spell. Heal isn't a wizard spell, and it isn't even a sorcerer spell.

[malthusis]

EBWOP:

"We're well beyond lurker lynches, especially lurker lynches with a legit reason for lurking, unless we process of elimination everyone else out"
This is a really subtle defense of Katsuki. I don't like it.

Wait, you're pushing for Katsuki and you don't have anything more then he's lurking?

Please read the last few pages. Me as well as few others listed several reasons beyond lurking.....

As well as a tack on to the spell discussion: "Having the most obvious spell" is not a reason to lynch someone. Would it make any sense if I lynched a person because they had Magic Missile because it

obviously

had to be faked?

[malthusis]

"We're well beyond lurker lynches, especially lurker lynches with a legit reason for lurking, unless we process of elimination everyone else out"
This is a really subtle defense of Katsuki. I don't like it.

Trip Post Edit: Just noting this to add on to me "Katsuki and Adumbro are scumbuddies" theory......