Just looking at your posts since the beginning :
-#88 : "I will unvote: VisMaior - I do not suspect him for now, and
I will not be guilty of lynching a possible townie
.". While the unvote could be explainable for not suspecting him (although there was no better target then apart from BJ), the second part of the sentence betrays a too big concern not about lynching an innocent but about being seen on a possible innocent lynch.
You also don't take any stance towards BJ when they are the only leads then, i.e. refuse to take any share of responsibility about what's happening then (2 innocents being under the spotlight).
- #91 : idem : concern about your apparence and too strong anticipation, presneted as a concern, of either being innocent. You're clearly not looking for scums there (seeing you're not after anyone else), you're looking not to compromise yourself if they turn up town.
- #125 : "bad guys could also easily clain mason" : bull.
"for now it seems that either BJ or VisMaior that will be lynched today" : too much anticipation to my taste here but okay.
"Vis has claimed cop, with counterclaim, and anyone could also claim this, (but he supposely meta-claimed BJ as scum - could this be a falsely reverse-truth-claim?)" : bull reason to avoid voting Vismaior but still pushing his wagon.
"I've still not decided who to vote for, but it is becoming clearer who the cop/cops should investigate tonight - so maybe the true/additional should not come out. " : directing cops to innocents.
- #132 : votes Vismaior when BJ is even further confirmed and Vismaior is clearly the goner. Then disappears a while.
- #235 : finishes !Chucklez!, who is the clear lynch then. Disappears again until...
- #328 : "It seems that we are running round in circles, eh? :Wink: ". Gives me a scummy vibe, although I'll grant that may be subjective. No real input after 100 posts. Disappears until...
- #383 : comes back to hypocritically focus on lurker just when the werebear wagon is taking place. Coincidence ? Would a townie lurker do that ?
- #398 : suddenly interested in post #336. Why not talking of it before ? Advises Werebear to claim, when he clearly has to.
- #401-402 : further fishes for info from TINM, when Werebear is the play.
- #406 : points at Werebear being in danger of being lynched and suggest unvoting him.
- #413-414 : finally votes Werebear, when he is already going anyway. Prepares to unvote if deadline is cancelled.
Here are my root arguments :
1. Your posts show a repeated pattern of concern about having innocent blood on his hands, particularly #88. The only insistance where you really take a position are ones where the lynch has already more or less been decided by the town.
2. Your attempt to side-track the Werebear attack onto lurkers is also a concern to me, seeing you didn't do so for BJ, Vismaior or !Chucklez!.
3. Finally, all the positions you have taken have been once the town had decided something. You always carefully avoided to start anything on your own, which denotes a lack of interest in active scum-hunting, and more in going-with-the-town-flow.
So, in short : you're scum.
For now, I'll ask Thoth to come up with reasons why I should be voting for him, and I'd like him to respond to those.
Commodore Amazing
