llamafluff wrote:
Do you want game threads or MD threads? Multiple of both exist. Especially for the vig hate. I even adhere to the like for vanilla games to an extent as a mod, you were in that last mountainous-esq theme I ran
1 town game, and 1 md please.
And I accept your point that Popularity Mafia is relevant here, but I don't think the fact that you chose a setup is clear evidence of a broader attitude.
Rabies wrote:xvart wrote:LlamaFluff, 45 wrote:2 I just chose two numbers around the midway point, got around the area in the draft I wanted actually
You
wanted
to be towards the bottom?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: llama
xvart.
hahahahahahahahaha
You're scum
VOTE: xvart
If you're so sure he is scum, why not put in an explanation that would convince other people of it?
Hoopla wrote:
The Xvart wagon is really dumb, mostly because I can't figure out why so many people think he's scummy. Someone post a succinct analysis/summary of why xvart is being wagoned, because I would really like to know. I'm obviously opposed to his lynch (today) due to him not being a unique number, but I doubt the case against him has any substance.
=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtop ... 3#p2640883
Note that I've retracted the +5, since the role in question didn't exist
I would also say, and maybe I missed something in an earlier post of yours that explains this, but why does the fact that one player has a non-unique number make them less likely to be scum, as opposed to it simply being unlikely that they are scum with the person/s with whom they share the number?
Parama wrote:Jack is scum
xvart is town
...
Ask and thou shall receive.
Please explain this one.
@Anybody:
Can somebody explain the Guderian-hate to me?
xvart wrote:
Because he doesn't say anything at all in that post. Nothing of any sort of substance. It's just a fluff comment: "yes this is likely, yes
As opposed to?
xvart wrote:
What business does SlowSilver have speculating on llama's internal motivations for wanting to be at the bottom of the list?
If you think a particular tell is invalid, there's normally no reason not to speak up.
Unless you think there is a good reason to wait and see how the other player responds.
Parama wrote:
/self-explanatory
Yeah... so many things wrong here. You're not voting... anyone... yet you call for a bandwagon. On a stupid BM vote. For no reason.
I don't get what the scumtell here is.
Parama wrote:Guderian wrote:parama, that's quite a list you've got there.
Passive as hell.
@Guderian: What was the point of saying "that's quite a list"?
Parama wrote:Guderian wrote:
If youre trying to get scum lynched, maybe you should vote yourself, instead of me? Just a thought.
How about a FATE case on you?
1. the second letter of your name is an a
2. the second letter of mafia is an a
3. YOUR SCUM SPAM SPAM SPAM
Wow. You're really serious here? And you're still not voting. The lack of a vote is quite damning. If you think someone is scum... you vote them.
How on earth do you make that attack based on what he said? He says a clearly stupid comment "Vote yourself instead of me" and then makes a joke case. And yet, you present it like it's hypocrisy?
Parama wrote:
The fact that you changed your numbers is a scumtell in itself <____<
How?
Parama wrote: This is just being dumb, but also a huge distraction. This may be the worst logic I've ever seen.
He's a newb and approaching VI territory - not scummy.
Jack wrote:
gandalf replaced in and thus didn't pick his numbers. So why is he saying "I don't know" when asked why he picked them?
unvote, vote:gandalf
*mental note to follow up if Gandalf doesn't answer*