Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Antihero]

Vi: Because we have a metric f$%#ton of content and all you have to say is "lol, frost buddied me as scum before. vote: frost"

[Antihero]

RF is a town read of mine, BTW.

[Antihero]

On AV: he brought himself up to null with his latest improvements.

this thread is in need of more kunk votes

[The Fonz]

on part of Tasky/Fishy/Anti, with anti the most likely sincere of those. AV metas, and changes mind as result- town sign.

[The Fonz]

And that's what happens when you try to doublepost when everyone's on.

[Herodotus]

This was mostly a defense of AV, basically calling them a protown scumhunter. Idk if my interpretation took it too far.

@Anti: ray as town? I'm ~skeptical.

[Antihero]

I got 3 posts in between your double posts, Fonz.

Gee, what a slowpoke. :appropriate emoticon:

[Kast]

AVs Posts
54 (39 adj. for multipost)
Game Specific:
49 (26)
Generic:
5 (4)
Fluff:
9 (9)

Tasks Posts
49 (38)
Game Specific:
31 (22)
Generic:
10 (8)
Fluff:
8 (8)

[The Fonz]

Yeah, doing arbitrary grading of posts isn't really going to cut it. You can't in honesty look at the two and think Tasky has been scumhunting nearly as much, surely?

[Kast]

It's subjective, but they're similar levels on posts, contributions, and fluff
AV pushed BS on Tas
Tas pushed ? on AV
AV pushing ? on Equi
Tas pushing BS on TF

[The Fonz]

See here, for instance- evidence that AV is doing votecount analysis, not something Tasky's come close to.

[The Fonz]

You can't call AV's task vote 'BS' without acknowledging that it was his first 'real' vote. First real votes are always weak.

[Kast]

AV hasn't been S/Hing any more than Task.

AV's only contribution is BS about voting a V/LA person, then voting equi for potentially softclaiming (wtf?)

[The Fonz]

I'm actually starting to think that Tasky is town and Kast is scum white knighting for him, though.

[The Fonz]

AV has been scumhunting SUBSTANTIALLY more than Tasky, and if you can't see that you're blind.

[Kast]

A BS vote is a BS vote, regardless of when it happens.

[The Fonz]

Bullshit. There's all the difference in the world between a reason good enough for a first vote and a reason good enough to actually lynch on.

Fixed tag. ~~NS

[Kast]

Lulz! Disagreement = scum?

[The Fonz]

Nope. That you appear to be opportunistically attacking a player who's come under a lot of heat, but upon inspection isn't scummy, is reason for suspicion.

[Herodotus]

@Fonz: I noticed that you stopped at 2...

[Kast]

"a reason good enough for a first vote" can still be BS. If you want to play by redefining things, fine AV's reason is insufficient for a first vote.

[Kast]

TF- Clarify what my "attack" on AV is.

[The Fonz]

So if I spent the rest of the game popping up every day or two to say that whatever Tasky's latest argument against me is, is wrong/ he's scum, would you consid

Truncated. ~~NS

[The Fonz]

I disagree. There's some slight validity there. Voting for V/LAs is not useful.

[Kast]

Task is right that D1 is very hard to find solid cases and reasons. The push on Task is arbitrary BS based on a misrep of his playstyle claim.