Mini #1081 - SitMOA Mafia (Endgame... Congrats, winners!)

[Doombunny9]

It might just so happen that I'm watching carefully instead of just randomly spouting anything that comes to mind.

Last time I checked, you can contribute and watch carefully.

1. He said I was scum because I had vote for chess while he had voted narsis, claiming i was buzzsaw defending
2. He said RVS is over much later than anyone else, and said that people who pointing that out where bandwagoning

Ok, I think I get it now.

(Hey TA, another list, guess you got two scum now XD)

That's a very different question.

TBH, I don't care. Now answer it.

Then don't use it to pad a substanceless case to make it look like it had more substance...

Regardless, there were some serious votes, but it seemed like the majority hadn't moved out of RVS.

But most of the people who were "still in the RVS" haven't came online since people started casting serious votes. The majority of the people who have posted since then were out of the RVS.

Hyperbole... I think you BELIEVE I'm scum, but you could definately do with a reread if you think this is even remotely legit.

Kay. I reread. Still legit.

I suggest you reread then.

You asked Kat (who needed it), me (who was active in discussion) and chess (Who is probably the person who talks THE MOST out of everyone).

Gandalf, can you tell me as to what flavor this game is based on? I thought it was just a snowbunny creation.

It's based off of magic thingy roles from D&D 3.5

[Katsuki]

A site where I can refer to everything would be nice.

[andrew94]

ffs, your chain quotes, i dont even know when he wrote them and what is before/ after it/
can u explain the context instead of X is scum due to this quote

[Doombunny9]

@Kat- I just Google whatever I need to know. I don't use a specific site or anything
@Andrew- Who was your question directed to?

[Narsis]

A site where I can refer to everything would be nice.

http://www.crystalkeep.com/d20/rules/Dn ... yClass.pdf

start at page 6 and go to page 20...

[andrew94]

^ you , icant follow where the quotes came from

[gandalf5166]

I stand corrected I'm also cool with you vigging Narsis.

With a claimed dayvig shot, are you worried about being nightkilled?

Nope.

What do you mean why?

Why do you believe he was defending his scumbuddy?

Because they're both scum, and he was defending him. I'm assuming they're scum. I suppose one of them could be an SK. Also, I've found that making absolute statements like that garners reactions that can be useful.

why would u claim a dag vig...

Pretty much this.

None of your business. Also, don't forget that I may or may not actually have it. I'm not telling you. I'm going to dangle it over all your heads.

In class right now, apologies for the utter lack of content in the last few days.

Gandalf, can you tell me as to what flavor this game is based on? I thought it was just a snowbunny creation.

It's D&D flavor. I believe 3.5.

A site where I can refer to everything would be nice.

http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page
That's the wiki.

[Doombunny9]

^ you , icant follow where the quotes came from

*Sigh* At the top of the quote box is something that says "<Player> wrote:" and then the quote. For example, the quote in 379 says "Katsuki wrote:" And then the quote. You should know this by now -_-

[andrew94]

dude, but from where and what context.
i can only currently find a bit of them.
i would prefer if u said post 'number' or at least explained the context.

just saying X is scummy for doing Y is not enough and it confuses other ppl who just skim through the thread


cough

[Narsis]

dude, but from where and what context.
i can only currently find a bit of them.
i would prefer if u said post 'number' or at least explained the context.

just saying X is scummy for doing Y is not enough and it confuses other ppl who just skim through the thread


cough

you say you are only skimming through the thread? additionally, it's really not that hard to follow where quotes are coming from if you are reading.

[chesskid3]

Narsis you owe me some commentary on people too, you know.

[andrew94]

yea, im studying for a chemistry exam on friday (2 days) that will be my last and ill start GETTTING CHESSKID after that

[chesskid3]

eh?

[andrew94]

you claimed one shot no lynch dude

[chesskid3]

so what does "getting chesskid" mean?

[chesskid3]

Also I believe I asked you this already, what's wrong with claiming a 1-shot no lynch?

[andrew94]

your reasoning was 'it was useless'
vanilla townies are useless to thnx

getting cheskid means geting u lynched

[Dark Horse]

None of your business. Also, don't forget that I may or may not actually have it. I'm not telling you. I'm going to dangle it over all your heads.

If you're alive toMorrow, i'll raise an eyebrow.

[ThAdmiral]

@thadmiral i dont think there is. a few days is enough to forget

You're nitpicking.

Alright so just lists in general are bad? What if I had just written it out in a paragraph?

Ok, so I didn't explain myself very clearly. That is my fault. I shall try again as clearly as possible:
It has less to do with the fact that it is a list than it is a bunch of fairly weak tells. By combining the tells you made it seem like you had a solid case, as there were 5 of them, even though you didn't.
My line of reasoning is this:
- you were doing that to justify placing your vote while also trying to manipulate others in to believing your case was stronger than it was,
- town would have no reason to behave like this,
- therefore you are not town.

@ andrew: why do you want to lynch chesskid. He claimed an ability, backed by flavor according to gandalf, that would result in a no-lynch if he ever got near -1 as he would use it on himself, so if you are trying to get him lynched essentially you are trying for a no-lynch.
Why are you trying for a no-lynch?

Also chess clearly is NOT SCUM! If he had a no-lynch ability as scum: a) there is no way he would have claimed it as the mafia could have just used it whenever they wanted to get another nk, b) giving scum a no-lynch is too powerful.
Unless you think he is lying about his claim, but this seems unlikely as it has been apparently backed up by flavor.

[chesskid3]

ThAdmiral why did you just open a can of Wifom stew?
Sigh.

[Narsis]

@thadmiral i dont think there is. a few days is enough to forget

You're nitpicking.

Alright so just lists in general are bad? What if I had just written it out in a paragraph?

Ok, so I didn't explain myself very clearly. That is my fault. I shall try again as clearly as possible:
It has less to do with the fact that it is a list than it is a bunch of fairly weak tells. By combining the tells you made it seem like you had a solid case, as there were 5 of them, even though you didn't.
My line of reasoning is this:
- you were doing that to justify placing your vote while also trying to manipulate others in to believing your case was stronger than it was,
- town would have no reason to behave like this,
- therefore you are not town.

town do have a reason to behave like this though in some sense. if you can't convince anyone of your case against scum, then no matter how good a scumhunter you are, you aren't going to get them lynched.

[Doombunny9]

dude, but from where and what context.
i can only currently find a bit of them.
i would prefer if u said post 'number' or at least explained the context.

I can safely say that unless I'm providing evidence (when I usually do put in the post #), its been one of the persons I quoted recentlys recent posts. If you're really having trouble with it just go back a page or two. You'll find it. And as Narsis said, just read the thread, you don't need to skim through everything.

your reasoning was 'it was useless'
vanilla townies are useless to thnx

so you want Chess lynched because... He claimed a useless ability? Following your logic that VTs are useless you also want every VT lynched too? What is this? (Also try to remember that he said he had a NO LYNCH ability that he said he would use whenever someone tried to lynch him. Think moar pl0x)

Ok, so I didn't explain myself very clearly. That is my fault. I shall try again as clearly as possible:
It has less to do with the fact that it is a list than it is a bunch of fairly weak tells. By combining the tells you made it seem like you had a solid case, as there were 5 of them, even though you didn't.
My line of reasoning is this:
- you were doing that to justify placing your vote while also trying to manipulate others in to believing your case was stronger than it was,
- town would have no reason to behave like this,
- therefore you are not town.

By "combining the tells" do you mean putting them all together or putting similar points together?

If you mean the first then what do you expect me to do? It was the first post in which I really talked about Adumbro and as a result needed to put all my points in one post (Unless you expect me to say something like "I'm voting Adumbro now but I won't provide my case all at once. I'm going to spread it out over the next couple of days")

If you mean the second one then I'll make this handy tabe for you:

Placing a RV after the RVS =/= Asking for townpicks
Placing a RV after the RVS =/= Not scumhunting
Placing a RV after the RVS =/= Smallish vibes
Placing a RV after the RVS =/= Lurking
Asking for townpicks =/= Not scumhunting
Asking for townpicks =/= Smallish vibes
Asking for townpicks =/= Lurking
Not scumhunting =/= Smallish vibes (Even someone who sits on their ass all day instead of contributing can at least choose someone to vote... Kinda like RBT)
Not scumhunting =/= Lurking (You can talk without really doing anything... Kinda like RBT)
Smallish vibes =/= Lurking

So yeah... If you did mean this then tell me which one you disagree with.

Also, you didn't answer my question towards you. Do so.

[chesskid3]

Ok. RBT has obviously decided.

Do we want to PL him for being a jerk, or shall we move over to malthusis? I'm good with either. I will not lose to lurkerscum.

[vezokpiraka]

Spell is Mass Suggestion. And i checked it know and it's not a shot for everyone. It's just for me. And I have some other abilities.

[Riceballtail]

At this point, I feel it is safe to say Chess is definitely scum. As a general whole, you are guilty of a very solid tell of mine.

Claiming an extremely anti-town ability, and then failing to answer any questions or responses I've made to you only adds to this list.

Unvote; Vote:Chess