Mini #1081 - SitMOA Mafia (Endgame... Congrats, winners!)

[Dark Horse]

That wasn't sarcastic. You are legit acting like that.

Also, I did address those points.

Opportunistic vote: Vagueness
Chainsaw & Wagon: Incorrect facts

noted

[chesskid3]

3rd vote on wagon.
Attacking me while I am voting Narsis is a chainsaw defense, like it or not (the part where you have ignored Narsis all game does not help).
Every person voting me except the RVS pokemon vote mentioned my statement that the RVS was not over as one of (if not the only) reason for the vote.

0/3 well played sir.
Now for Doombunny:

RVS is not over.

I'm just going to back away slowly...

VOTE: Andrew
Scummityscumscum.

This legit or RVS? If it is a fo' rlz vote then do you care to explain?

Unvote
Vote: Narsis
Scum. Srs bisness

Again... can we see some explaination?

Vote: Chess

fo' rlz for not even reading the thread (or else he'd know that RVS was over), thinking the RVS was still going despite the fo' srz votes, and for lack of any explainations.

@Adumbro- Read the thread pl0x. The RVS was over a while ago.

RVS is not over. Tsk tsk.

We're still in RVS now

READ THE THREAD DAMNIT! These posts just made me a lot happier with my vote.

Now the rvs is over :teach:

you're kind of late there... Although I understand that no one likes admitting that they're wrong and that the RVS ened a long, long time ago.

Ok these are all about RVS not being over, and Doom uses two of my quotes about not thinking the RVS is over to JUSTIFY his vote.
Now we have these:

This is not me admitting I'm wrong, this is me saying that the rvs is NOW over, but wasn't before.
lrn2read

That was not what I was saying. I was saying that it seemed to me you just decided to arbitarily "end the RVS" right there despite the fact that it was over a while ago and that you're STILL (Not were) having trouble admitting it.

Anyways, that doesn't matter much now since we can both agree that the RVS is over and any discussion about when it ended is basically a waste of time at this point.

@Chess/Malt- Why are we still talking about the overness of the RVS? It's over. We can all agree on that. It doesn't matter when it was over anymore.

Spot the backtracking for a bonus point, yo. It is not irrelevant, since you decided to use it to try and build a case on me. Tsk tsk.

narsis still needs to respond.

[Dark Horse]

3rd vote on wagon.

I'm not voting because of a wagon. I'm voting because I genuinely think you're scum

Attacking me while I am voting Narsis is a chainsaw defense, like it or not (the part where you have ignored Narsis all game does not help).[/quoute]

WAT

That's a horribly pathetic reason. Chainsaw defense=Defending someone by attacking the person voting, not what you said.

Every person voting me except the RVS pokemon vote mentioned my statement that the RVS was not over as one of (if not the only) reason for the vote.

Not me

[chesskid3]

Hi, you don't read much, do you? We're still in RVS now, and i'm clearly trying to get us OUT. Thanks for playing. You are the weakest link, goodbye!

Seriously? Rvs ended a long Time ago. You really should go and read back.

Also, show me where you are "trying to get us out of rvs".

unvote, vote: chesskid

Not you, really?

[chesskid3]

As to your first point, maybe so, maybe not, but FMPOV it's a pretty opportunistic vote.

[Snow_Bunny]

Votecount - Discussion heats up

gandalf5166 (0) -
malthusis (1) - andrew94
Riceballtail (0) -
Vren (0) -
Narsis (1) - chesskid3
Dark Horse (0) -
chesskid3 (3) - Doombunny9, AdumbroDeus, Dark Horse
Doombunny9 (0) -
vezokpiraka (1) - Riceballtail
andrew94 (1) - gandalf5166
Katsuki (0) -
AdumbroDeus (1) - Katsuki

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is on at November 22nd midnight.

[gandalf5166]

Chess is making me raise my eyebrow........... But I've played with him before, and this is all pretty normal stuff, so until he does something really drastic, my vote stays where it is.

This is pretty much the same problem with YOU, gandalf, in that, you guys generally say and do such ridiculous things that, when you do it as scum, it STILL looks normal.

In essence, what I am saying is, saying that "extraordinary" stuff is "pretty normal stuff" is kind of like throwing a smokescreen on your play.

Oh, I'm not going to lie, that's exactly why I play the way I play. At least I actually find scum, unlike

some people.

All this "opportunistic vote" talk has made me change my mind about chess. That's a scum tactic to ward off votes. Seen it done before, and it's being done now.

unvote
Vote:chesskid3

[chesskid3]

doublefacepalm.jpg

Because I totally didn't just catch Dark Horse lying, amirite?
And because Narsis has totally responded to my question, amirite?

[Doombunny9]

@Chess- At first I was telling you to read the thread and stuff because that was before you admitted the RVS was over. I started saying that we should stop talking about the RVS because you finally said that the RVS was over and everyone at that point could agree on it. Meaning there was no point about arguing about it anymore. Next time think first, then post

I want to hear from Adumbro moar.

[chesskid3]

You can't discard it when it's supposedly the reason you and Darkhorse are voting for me. You want to discard it, either move your vote or give reasons nao.

[gandalf5166]

I also really don't like his chainsaw defense accusations.

[chesskid3]

Hi.
Please respond to my post.
Bye.

[andrew94]

i have about 2 days v/la please.

i gotta say, wagon on chess looks oppurtunistic

[Doombunny9]

You can't discard it when it's supposedly the reason you and Darkhorse are voting for me. You want to discard it, either move your vote or give reasons nao.

From weakest to strongest they are:

1. Your previous refusal to explain your vote
2. Your refusal to answer questions
3. Your weak and questionable reasoning for Voting/FoSing Narsis and DH

Anyways, I'm tired and beginning to rethink my chess vote as he's beginning to seem tyown in some elements but scum in others. Will reread chess's iso (And everybody elses while I'm at it) tomorrow.

[chesskid3]

1. I explained it immediately after Narsis responded, no?
2. ....Show me a question I haven't answered?
3. OMG MY CASE IS "WEAK" ON PAGE 7 OF DAY 1? OMG WAT SHOULD I DO? ZOMG SUICIDE IRL PL0X?

Things Narsis has done:
Offer to do a wagon analysis but then not actually do it because, you know, everybody unvoted. (Towncred without doing any of the work required to actually earn said towncred? ithinkso)
Say why me? when chosen as a target for a vote.
Lurk after being asked a question.

Have I ever said BLAM BLAM BLAM he's 100% scum lolol? Nope. I asked him a question - asked him for two suspects with reasons. Fairly reasonable request, made 27 hours ago.
The fact that like 3 people got all up in arms about me reaction hunting on Narsis also struck me as rather strange, but that's gut, and not anything Narsis did, so it wouldn't be fair to hold it against him. When he returns from wherever he is, if he makes a satisfactory post, I shall move my vote to my next suspect.
That's how you play mafia. :teach:

[gandalf5166]

i have about 2 days v/la please.

i gotta say, wagon on chess looks oppurtunistic

Lol congrats, you can defend your scumbuddy.

[AdumbroDeus]

UNVOTE:


Chess seems more dumb then scum for now.

i have about 2 days v/la please.

i gotta say, wagon on chess looks oppurtunistic

Lol congrats, you can defend your scumbuddy.

Question, why?

@chess and doom:

Who are your top scumpicks and townpicks, and why?

/confirm

I think you need more then that...

Care to comment on chess vs. doom?

Also, what are your scumpicks?

@mod:

Prod Vren please.

Vren asked for a replacement, and I'm still looking for it.

[chesskid3]

If by dumb you mean "deals with scumtastic attacks while still doing an excellent job of scumhunting" then sure, I agree with you.

In other news, WAY TO ASK PEOPLE FOR SCUMPICKS WITHOUT GIVING ANY OF YOUR OWN. Hypocrisy much?

@AdumbroDeus

: Who are your top scumpicks and townpicks, and why?

[Dark Horse]

Hi, you don't read much, do you? We're still in RVS now, and i'm clearly trying to get us OUT. Thanks for playing. You are the weakest link, goodbye!

Seriously? Rvs ended a long Time ago. You really should go and read back.

Also, show me where you are "trying to get us out of rvs".

unvote, vote: chesskid

Not you, really?

Yes, as your last couple of votes are further helping my point.

In other news, WAY TO ASK PEOPLE FOR SCUMPICKS WITHOUT GIVING ANY OF YOUR OWN. Hypocrisy much?


@AdumbroDeus: Who are your top scumpicks and townpicks, and why?

Are. You. Serious.

You can't discard it when it's supposedly the reason you and Darkhorse are voting for me.

But it's not. I'm voting for you because I think you're scum.

Because I totally didn't just catch Dark Horse lying, amirite?

How am I lying?

[chesskid3]

Posts 152 and 153. GG.

[chesskid3]

Also for someone who asserted that they wanted Ambro to post (may have been someone else, if so disregard), you seem awfully unconcerned with the fact that he unvoted, didn't put his vote anywhere, but started asking other people for scum/townreads without giving any himself.
That's called sitting back, waiting for a bandwagon and then joining after it's got momentum. Scumtastic. I will not be adressing any requests he made of me until he does them himself. If you have a problem with that, there's something wrong with you.

[vezokpiraka]

Chess is town.. He doesn't act like that as scum.
Let him live. Let's wagon a scum like malthusis.

vote matlhusis

[Narsis]

Things Narsis has done:
Offer to do a wagon analysis but then not actually do it because, you know, everybody unvoted. (Towncred without doing any of the work required to actually earn said towncred? ithinkso)

it's not because everyone unvoted. it's because people weren't properly unvoting/voting when making their votes.

Say why me? when chosen as a target for a vote.

it's a legitimate question. i dont see the huge scum motivation behind asking it.

Lurk after being asked a question.

busy with things(play mafia isn't the only thing i do with my life)

i gotta say, wagon on chess looks oppurtunistic

i agree yet disagree. Dark Horse vote on chess is the only one that feels opportunistic imo, but it's borderline opportunistic. (as in there's still a good chance imo that it's not)

Chess is town.. He doesn't act like that as scum.
Let him live. Let's wagon a scum like malthusis.

vote matlhusis

two things:

1) people can change their meta
2) why is malthusis scum?

Name two people you have suspicions of, and explain them, please. Small suspicions are even fine, if that's all you have.

vezokpiraka: for not doing anything but actually being around and posting.
andrew94: for similar reasons

[chesskid3]

So Vezok and Andrew are larger scum suspects to you than me,doom,darkhorse,mathusis all are?

[Narsis]

So Vezok and Andrew are larger scum suspects to you than me,doom,darkhorse,mathusis all are?

at this point i believe so yes.