nopointinactingup wrote:Are you blatantly rolefishing or something. If you thought he bread-crumbed Doctor you should have kept it to yourself.
I don't think he bread crumbed anything. He didn't say anything in his post to indicate that he was a doctor. He said something about making like Van Helsing and I made a joke about it. Maybe pick up a book sometime, guys? You'll get a lot more references.
nopointactingup wrote:
How is silverbullet twisting your word? You specifically stated "I believe its you who calls werewolf noobscum" on post 60. Way to flail.
I'm not flailing anywhere. That is what I said. He in no way twisted those particular words. I'm clearly referring to my doctor line. He twisted it into meaning something other than a stand alone, meritless comment. No reply to it was needed nor was it ever going to have a follow up. Google Van Helsing. He was a doctor. I don't think anyone who was actually the doctor would make such a dumb clue about it on Day 1. By the way, I say later on in the post that werewolf called him noob scum. which is what happened. Way to jump on typing errors.
nopointactingup wrote:This post doesn't seem like a good reason to put someone at L-1. Be specific, what is the connection you are seeing and why?
Is it bad play to put someone at L-1 when we have no information to go off of? If it is then I'll own up to this being a huge 'newb mistake' and back off. I just don't feel like anyone is going to cast that final vote without more information(town for fear of mislynch and scum for the sake of just not looking incredibly suspicious by jumping to a quick lynch). I feel like it's adequate pressure to place on someone to get discussion moving.
Like I said I haven't played this game in two years and even then I only played one newbie game. Is placing this kind of pressure a serious error on my part?
I'm going to
unvote
until I get an answer, but I'm not being flaky. Once I get an answer from some users with more experience than me I'll make a more informed move. But I still want to put the focus on werewolf. By unvoting him right now I'm just acknowledging the people that seem to think that it is a mistake until I get other people's opinions on it. If it isn't a stupid thing to do I will gladly put my vote back where it was.
As far as the connection thing goes, I was just referring to the way that he immediately jumped on silverbullet's random vote and then referred to him as 'noob scum' in a later post. Those two posts are really meaningless right now and I probably shouldn't have said anything about it. That wasn't my purpose for voting him, though. I stated my reason for voting werewolf as being that he keeps calling people scum but he's stuck by his random vote. He hasn't even made a post directed towards the person he's voting for but continues to find other people suspicious. I put him at L-1 to get him talking, because I don't even understand the reason for the SlowSilver bandwagon(probably just to get something going early on?). Werewolf is the only person I find suspicious atm.
I don't even know why silverbullet is getting so defensive aside from my original error in saying that he called werewolf scum. Clearly that was a typo, as I said what actually happened later on in the post. I even stated in that sentence that what I was noticing was from werewolf and not him. 'it seems more like it's coming from werewolf than you. He's a bit fishy.'
