Shepherd_of_Wolves wrote:I feel like Zero could be a God Father, but how is it better to trust that suspicion than to trust my result. To me, my results seem the best evidence. Everyone seems scummy to some degree. I do not know a better way to decode it.
well if we trust your results...
then 2 of me, Nacho, and Anti are probably scum.
i know i am innocent leaving Nacho and Anti.
but i see no reason for scum to have no killed night 1. which means Nacho is confirmed.
which means that one of the people you targetted is some form of perfect lier or you are lying.
the idea that scum need to lie by some deadline is kinda stupid. scum are going to lie in a game eventually. they need to if they plan on winning. so requiring them to do something they are already going to do is just redundant and doesnt make sense.
@Tasky: why Ben Reynolds? how do you know that no one has that as their name?
additionally, how will it help to have SoW kill using that lie? especially if that person is town. because if the person doesnt die then we have a perfect lying godfather of some sort? yet that still would be essentially a 1/4 shot in the dark by SoW at who it is, and if he guesses wrong then town loses the game. also dont forget that if Anti isn't scum for some reason, then we'll probably lose as well.
however, let's say we no lynch. SoW targets either me or Antihero based on our "I'm aligned with the town" posts. if the person dies, then yay we got scum. if the person doesnt die, then he hit town(most likely unless there are two perfect lying scum which would completely defeat the purpose of having the vig in the first place. a vig that can only hit one target is kinda pointless. it's like having 2 godfathers and a cop in a normal game.) then if SoW died, we lynch the other between me and Antihero. if SoW doesnt die, we can repeat the process in some form or another.
i find the no lynch/vig strategy to be a much safer way of doing this then your plan Tasky.
