Mini 245 - Stick Figures Mafia - Game Over!

Narninian · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:36 am

Bacde wrote:
Dragon Phoenix wrote:Well, it looks like the bandwagon-claim-bandwagon-claim and so on tactics strike gold again.
Agreed.

Unvote, Vote: Narninian

not my fault..

Bacde · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:05 pm

I never said it was.

BabyJesus · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:12 pm

Can we focus on lynching changling bob pls...

LyingBrian · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:16 pm

BabyJesus wrote:Can we focus on lynching changling bob pls...

any particular reason why? and you do realize you're the only person voting for him, right?

Narninian · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:26 pm

unvote: tyfo

obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..

mathcam · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 8:14 pm

BabyJesus wrote: what makes you think it was insincere....

Well, is it not rather obvious that anyone pro-town would not want the doc lynched? Only someone going out of their way to try to

appear

pro-town would bother to explicitly mention it. That's what makes your mention of it sound insincere. Incidentally, the question "What makes you think it was insincere" was a far more valid response to my accusation than a ":roll:."

Cam

Changling bob · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:55 am

Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..

Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.

BabyJesus · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:07 am

Changling bob wrote:
Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..
Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.

What tactic is "faulty"....

Changling bob · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:11 am

BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..
Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.
What tactic is "faulty"....

Bandwagon to claim on everyone in the game.

Also, single line posts that don't advance the game.

BabyJesus · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:40 am

Changling bob wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..
Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.
What tactic is "faulty"....
Bandwagon to claim on everyone in the game.

Also, single line posts that don't advance the game.

Since when am I responsible for the runup on Tyfo?? Plus I'm pretty sure I advocated several times we should lynch Narninian.

Trying to cast suspicion on me for false pretenses is why I am voting you , guy.

BabyJesus · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:41 am

Changling bob wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..
Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.
What tactic is "faulty"....
Bandwagon to claim on everyone in the game.

Also, single line posts that don't advance the game.

Oh, and you seem to be implying the runup on Tyfo was faulty....do you somehow KNOW that he really is the doc, and not faking?

interesting...

Changling bob · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:05 am

BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..
Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.
What tactic is "faulty"....
Bandwagon to claim on everyone in the game.

Also, single line posts that don't advance the game.
Oh, and you seem to be implying the runup on Tyfo was faulty....do you somehow KNOW that he really is the doc, and not faking?

interesting...

No, I don't.

But we've now exposed someone who's claimed doc. Shall we out the cop next?

BabyJesus · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:08 am

Changling bob wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:
Narninian wrote:obviously we dont want to lynch a doc on day 1 without a counterclaim..
Is a day one counterclaim of doc really the best play ever?

Also, your tactic has been proved to be faulty, and you still persue it BJ? Good jorb. I think my vote's still on you.
What tactic is "faulty"....
Bandwagon to claim on everyone in the game.

Also, single line posts that don't advance the game.
Oh, and you seem to be implying the runup on Tyfo was faulty....do you somehow KNOW that he really is the doc, and not faking?

interesting...
No, I don't.

But we've now exposed someone who's claimed doc. Shall we out the cop next?

Are you claiming cop with only one vote??

Changling bob · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:05 am

BabyJesus · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:37 am

Changling bob wrote:No.

then its safe to run you up, no?

mathcam · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:05 pm

It's significantly easier to read the thread if you

don't

quote the posts immediately proceeding yours. One nice thing about the posts being listed in order is that you've just read the posts before the current post, so it's unnecessary to repeat them.

Cam

BabyJesus · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:47 pm

mathcam wrote:It's significantly easier to read the thread if you
don't
quote the posts immediately proceeding yours. One nice thing about the posts being listed in order is that you've just read the posts before the current post, so it's unnecessary to repeat them.

Cam

I see.

BrianMcQueso · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:07 pm

EDIT: Vote count corrected, thanks to LyingBrian.

Replacementaloo!

Changling bob · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:59 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
Changling bob wrote:No.
then its safe to run you up, no?

Well if you want you can. I wouldn't, but then I'm not bandwagon-happy.

Also, sorry Mathcam

LyingBrian · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:13 pm

Unvote

Vote: Blackberry

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:18 am

Hey everyone! I'll be catching up today and posting later tonight (12-14 real hours).

mathcam · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:59 am

No prob, Bob.

I still prefer my Narninian vote, but at this point I'd be willing to switch to BJ. My point about his doc comment still stands out to me.

Cam

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:39 am

Bandwagon / Claim is a typical opening... and it's ugly.

Vote: Narnian

, and with the worst case scenario (a dead townie), we won't expose any other power role and will allow the town to generate some info.

Karo · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:26 am

It's curious how so many people accept a random bandwagon as a favorable way to end day one when there was no previous night.

mathcam · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:38 am

Whether or not it started out random is pretty irrelevant...currently, the decision on whether or not to vote Narninian is far from random. My own gut feelings aside, there's the fact that he claimed townie: There are several reasons this is important. First, if he's telling the truth, we've lost less than we would have if we lynched a claimed anything-else. Second, since townies are guaranteed (essentially) to be in the game by the opening post, it's also a very safe claim for scum to make, which can be especially importnat on day 1, as the mafia don't yet know what sorts of pro-town roles are in the game (and hence don't know how to format their fake claims).

It's not like I think we've got a sure thing, here, as is evidenced by my willingness to switch to BJ instead. But I

do

think there are a couple of reasons to go after Narninian, and very few reasons to go after anyone else.

Cam