Mini 1072 - Battle of Alcatraz

[SpyreX]

NICE TRY EVEN I CANT DIVIDE BY ZERO MUHAHA

[SpyreX]

At least...

Not yet.

Soon. Soon.

[Budja]

Right, done a read.

Kat is annoying but town who does not have the will to wield the CAPS LOCK.
Reaper was right in that I was sheeping him a bit before, but I still like his reads a lot. (#162 was good)
Cooldog is town (gut, don't question me).

Figured out some of what I don't like about SpyreX. Its not like you to sit in the shadows and not take charge.

Exe, Spy are still suspects as before.
I don't really have a third but I am against lynching the previously mentioned three.

[SpyreX]

Budja if I wasn't 4 seconds from bed I could strangle you through the internet.

I'M TRYING here and while I will hammer the hell out of Exe I've still not gotten anything explaining to me why what I'm on is so left field.

[Copper]

Budja, why is it that every post you make looks extremely fake to me?

I don't want to give a top three because I need more input from the heads, but, personally, Muffin, nopoint, and Budja are all bad news to me.

[Exe]

Hammer request with no claim? That's just anti-town.

[CooLDoG]

Sorry I didn't post yesterday, I came down with a bad cold...catching up.

[CooLDoG]

@exe, no it won't be because Spy is an actor (that is the correct name for him). And if Spy is in fact an actor L-2 becomes the new L-1. I still don't find him scummy...

mod, I have my vote on kat

@RC That is not a correct proof for 1=2, I don't have time to explain to you the logical errors in that, thus you are not a 2x voter.

[CooLDoG]

vote kat

just to make sure.

[nopointinactingup]

@RC: I don't think Exe is the way to go today. Can you reply to my counter case against your Exe case?

[Muffin]

Sorry guys, got busy irl. Trying to catch up.

[Fate]

*takes a nap*

Vote Count

nopointinactingup (2): Copper, SpyreX
CoolDoG (2): Exe, nopointinactingup
SpyreX (0):
McGriddle (0):
Hinduragi (0):
Katsuki (2): TheButtonMen, CooLDoG

Exe (5): Katsuki, Muffin, Budja, McGriddle, ReaperCharlie

Muffin (1): Hinduragi
ReaperCharlie (0):
Budja (0):
Copper (0):
TheButtonmen (0):

Not voting:

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline: MONDAY October 25th.

[Exe]

So wait...I'm still at 5 votes but now McGriddle is on me...who was the error? I'm confused...

A few people really need to post. 3 days til deadline....

[TheButtonmen]

Deadline in 72, bad exe wagon is bad.

Time for some co-ordination, who's down with a Mcgriddle or Kats lynch?

[ReaperCharlie]

Exe: Try reading the thread. The answers will reveal themselves to you.

TBM: If your vote is not on Exe, you are DEAD WRONG. I hate how you always split the vote away from GOOD wagons with your TERRIBLE tunneling. UGGGGHHH

@RC: Can you reply to my counter case against your Exe case?

I didn't realize you wanted a response. Here ya go.

2. After a quick ISO, I notice: Exe votes for me, THEN LATER, unvote/revotes me (i.e. not paying attention to who he's voting for, because it doesn't matter to him as long as

somebody

is lynched. The game is only 3 pages long. This is not hard to keep track of). Then, when called out on his reasons for voting me, unvote/votes Mr ActingUp over there when it looks like any wagon on me is dead/dying, and NoPoint's wagon may well take off. Scummy in two ways. (category:

not paying attention to who he's voting for, just jumping on wagons with poor reasoning

) (category: opportunistic, )

3.

In his most recent post, Exe (inexplicably??) apologizes for being inactive (after only just over a day's absence).

Keep in mind, he's posted as many or more posts than 2/3 of players in the game, AND nobody's called anyone out yet for lack of content. Not even the guy(s?) who have only posted twice. Scummy (category: false sense of having to contribute, feeling like he's not doing enough, feels like he has to apologize to stay in town's good graces. even though nobody has said anything, and his 'offense' of being 'inactive' was far from egregious. Heck, I haven't posted for days.)

5. Logically then, 2 + 2 = scum.

Vote: Exe

2>
a> I don't agree with this point. I think a town has more of a mentality to forget their RVS vote.
b> I agree that his vote on me was off.
3> I think that's a null tell. He is a bit inactive in comparision to the usual Exe.
In conclusion, I'm not feeling the Exe wagon. I think CoolDog and McGriddle and more likely scum. In addition to blatantly not paying attention to what I was saying, he's also looking more opportunistic than Exe. Note that right after my post #56, he had 2 posts unrelated to my RVS explanation. However, as soon as people were expressing approval for my wagon he began sheeping others' reasoning to bandwagon me. If he genuinely thought I was scummy from that RVS explanation, why didn't he start the wagon himself when he was there first to do so.

2a) k. Agree to disagree.
2a) k. Agreed.
3) Never met the "usual Exe" so I wouldn't know how active he is. Apologizing for it out of hand is scummy though. Especially since nobody asked for an apology or said anything about his absence. It's a subconscious thing; scum do it. I know. I feel like doing it too, every time I'm scum. You know how those TV shows try to take you inside the mind of a bank robber? Well I'm taking you inside the mind of scum. Simple as that.

[Exe]

3) Never met the "usual Exe" so I wouldn't know how active he is. Apologizing for it out of hand is scummy though. Especially since nobody asked for an apology or said anything about his absence. It's a subconscious thing; scum do it. I know. I feel like doing it too, every time I'm scum. You know how those TV shows try to take you inside the mind of a bank robber? Well I'm taking you inside the mind of scum. Simple as that.

And what happens when I do this same thing in every game? Am I scum in every game I play? Not likely.

[ReaperCharlie]

HAHA! Are you kidding me?

Your argument is that since you are playing to your scummy meta, that it is not scummy, and therefore you are not scum?

Where's my rope. WTF is this sh*t.

[TheButtonmen]

TBM: If your vote is not on Exe, you are DEAD WRONG. I hate how you always split the vote away from GOOD wagons with your TERRIBLE tunneling.

In your mind who's being wagoned right now?

[Exe]

HAHA! Are you kidding me?

Your argument is that since you are playing to your scummy meta, that it is not scummy, and therefore you are not scum?

Where's my rope. WTF is this sh*t.

No, my point is that as I've said before

I always let my fellow players know that on weekends I am not around

. You claim this is scummy behavior, I claim that it has no effect on alignment

because I always do it

.

[ReaperCharlie]

Just because you

always

do something in a scummy way, doesn't make it

not

scummy!

And besides, look at your OWN SIG:

"Do not expect me to play to a meta."

So lets see here.... in your sig, you are going out of your way to make it clear that you're

not

playing to meta, but now once you've been called out on doing something scummy, you're going out of your way to say that you

are

playing to meta?

LIES, I TELL YOU! LIIIIEEEESSS

CAUGHTSCUM NEEDS ROPE NAO PLZ THX

[Exe]

Just because you

always

do something in a scummy way, doesn't make it

not

scummy!

And besides, look at your OWN SIG:

"Do not expect me to play to a meta."

So lets see here.... in your sig, you are going out of your way to make it clear that you're

not

playing to meta, but now once you've been called out on doing something scummy, you're going out of your way to say that you

are

playing to meta?

LIES, I TELL YOU! LIIIIEEEESSS

CAUGHTSCUM NEEDS ROPE NAO PLZ THX

No, it's not meta. It's a standard.

Meta is playstyle. Being busy on weekends is not a playstyle.

Your arguments are complete crap, and you're wasting the town's time with this bullshit case. Especially when letting people know that you won't be posting much on weekends is

not

a legitimate scumtell in any world.

Stop being dense. You want to taste your foot in your mouth? I'll put the damn info in my signature, and then I'll watch you claim that updating one's signature with activity information is scumm too!

If you are going to push a case, at least make it make sense. Or at least, after I flip town, lynch the lazyscum who are buddying you and piggybacking insanely.

[ReaperCharlie]

cool story bro

[TheButtonmen]

MAYBE YOU WILL PAY ATTENTION IF I LEFTSHIT THIS.

REAPER A) YOU DEMANDED EVERYONE GIVE TOP THREE AND DIDN'T AND B) YOUR IGNORING MY QUESTION!!!

[Exe]

Since it seems pretty clear that I'll probably be the lynch target today, I want these people to state their cases on me IN THIS ORDER:

McGriddle, Muffin, Budja.

I'll force you guys to take a stand and justify your positions so that D2 town knows where to find scum.
Go.

[ReaperCharlie]

TBM: If your vote is not on Exe, you are DEAD WRONG. I hate how you always split the vote away from GOOD wagons with your TERRIBLE tunneling.

In your mind who's being wagoned right now?

Exe is. With 3 other dueling counter-wagons tied at 2 votes each.

(lrn2reedvotecountz)

And you are sitting on a fruitless counter-wagon, being useless. As usual.

What's your point?