The White Spy is slacking and needs to make his thoughts know in thread …
Bowser wrote:Will it help you to read the thread? They still quoted us out of context.
Regardless of whether you were quoted out of context or not the quote tampering you did to ‘prove your point’ isn’t a valid parallel. You should have simply presented the quote to show how it was taken out of context.
CrabCanon wrote:Also, repeating: SOTTY7. HI. ARE YOU SCUM?
(you know we'll find out sooner or later in which hydra you are anyway.)
I know you probably have some personal tell related to Sotty that is driving this but do you really expect any answer other than ‘No’?
CrabCanon wrote:This is really really stupid.
No, it’s not. It is a quite logical thought process. Care to throw in a ‘NO U’ while you are at it if you are making pointless rhetorical statements?
CrabCanon wrote:And this is contradictory to it - cancels out the alleged strong scum motive for finding out "dangerous players".
BZTTT … incorrect. From a scum perspective they know their own members and thus know what players out there are most likely to be dangerous to them. As an example – Sotty was able to more or less nail Zachrulez in /invitiational 8 simply because she knew his playstyle so well. Scum are going to know those players who can read them as scum the best, if those players exist in the game. So going for a full name-claim lays the information out there.
A Town protective role, on the other hand, has no inside knowledge. God forbid if they choose to defend a ‘Vet’ Hydra based on being the heads being vets as opposed to Town play and that Hydra is Mafia.
Pineapple wrote:you misunderstand. we do need to scum hunt.
Then why are you instead playing a very passive, reactionary game?
Pineapple wrote:i never said that i'm not scum hunting.
You don’t have to say you aren’t – your ISO reveals that you aren’t.
WhiteSpy has said he’s working on a case on someone. I’ve held off making a vote so far but Pineapple has done nothing to change my initial gut scum read and I dislike having an inactive vote once serious play gets rolling.
VOTE: Pineapple
IceCream wrote:My scumdar is pinging. Why is him asking the questions scummy?
Your scumdar is in need of maintenance. The issue is not the questions. The issue is that in the post the questions were asked T&J did not answer them. It leads to two options –
1. If the questions are indeed useful for providing solid game information why did T&J not answer them when originally asked, or even later?
2. If the questions aren’t useful why even ask them? That would be a pure fluffing post then.
In either case I don’t see a strong Town motivation in T&J’s play there.
@Tom or Jerry
- At least one of you needs to answer your own questions.
T&J’s reveal at 154 I think is very interesting –
Lat has revealed that Professor Paradox fake-claimed one of it’s heads for lulz. This was a direct attempt to provide false information to Town in a way that would possibly interfere with Meta efforts by some players who favor meta. This has a similar effect to Hydra’s withholding who their heads are.
Logically Town players who were strongly for outing of heads should see PP’s actions as equally Anti-Town / Scummy.
Those players who have expressed that Mass Name Claiming is the way to go and those not doing so are Anti-Town / Scummy -
CrabCanon, FourTigers, Faranor
What was those Hydra’s reaction to the revelation that PP fake-claimed a Name?
FourTigers – reaction was to defend self from T&J’s attack and question why a Fakenameclaim is a Scumtell.
Faranor – Similar reaction to FourTigers – wonders why fakenameclaiming is a scum-tell.
CrabCanon – Says not much, other than to perhaps dismiss it as worthy of conversation since it was Elli doing his regular pointless play.
I’m not seeing consistency in any of these opinions. Will have to look more closely.