The "advice" thing was rhetorical. You didn't get it. From what I understand, your question was simply a means by which to start discussion. Apparently, it wasn't working very well because all I could see was a stagnated game with more discussion about a theory topic that wasn't even going to come up until the end of the day at least than on actual scum-hunting. Yes it is the interest of a townie to attempt to get the game back on track.Blackberry wrote:Bud - you seem to analyze my actions in-depth, yet, you didn't even read. I state quite clearly the point of asking a question in my posts.
Also, why would you think I'd ask it "for advice" when, in this early in the game, nobody is actually going after me?
I feel you're lack of clarity and sensibility warrants a vote. Your reaction to this vote will deem whether I do in fact lean towards you being mafia moreso or not. Right now it's on the fence, but your reason for voting me does not make sense/if you were a town and that was your sincere reason for voting me I don't believe it whatsoever, as it implies you didn't even read my post.
Unvote, Vote: Bub Bidderskins
The vote got the town off track of what they were supposed to do: scumhunt. Instead of asking players question about their posts, instead we are answering generic theory questions. How is my vote "opportunistic"?Xvart wrote:Got everyone off track of what? Were we on to something? This looks like an opportunistic vote on something that could be considered scummy. And the last sentence seems a little too sensationalized with the little jab at the end.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bub Bidderskins
xvart.
Also, sometimes townies have to be sensational to get their point across and get their team out of a ditch.