Mini 1054/The Illusion - Creation (Over)

GhostWriter · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:22 pm

For the record, is there anyone else with a two-part or longer name, or am I seriously the only one?

UncertainKitten · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:24 pm

You are. Zang claimed...um...something, but it was one word, and I claimed teacher. And we were the only remaining unclaimed after xvart claimed.

GhostWriter · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:27 pm

Oh, wow... lovely.

xvart · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:33 pm

UncertainKitten, 224 wrote:To be fair, I've been abrasive to the point of making the game unfun as of late, so I'm trying to be a lot more chill so as to not piss people off anymore. It's an interesting insight though. I mean, you're wrong, but...I admit your thought process intrigues me ^-^.

Awwwee... But that's what I loved about playing with you, UK (of course I have a thicker skin than some of the people on here)

Regardless, I can't shake this feeling that you are subtly stroking my ego in attempts to appease me. Call it reminiscent of SC's computer game, but that is what is going through my head. I think you are fine hammering because you know it isn't going to kill you and you'll score some town points out of it. If nobody backs me on this train of thought, I'll hammer as long as everyone says we can take a good long look at UK tomorrow when GW flips non bomb scum.

The other thing that makes me believe that the claim is completely fabricated is that the flavor just seems a little too much and too detailed compared to what my role pm says, and what I'm guessing everyone's pm looks like. In this "experiment" I don't see a tight rope walker parading around amongst all the other roles.

xvart.

GhostWriter · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:26 pm

You mean the flavor I admitted to adding on in an attempt to lead my role to look like a vengeful role rather than a bomb role? Because all my flavor actually talks about is that I must maintain my balance and that die upsets that, and that I knock my killer/hammer voter in with me.

TonyMontana · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:35 pm

xvart wrote:If nobody backs me on this train of thought, I'll hammer as long as everyone says we can take a good long look at UK tomorrow when GW flips non bomb scum.

I'm both for you hammering, and for looking at UK tomorrow. If GW does flip non-bomb scum, we'll have two more lynches to find the remaining scum.

GhostWriter · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:36 pm

What happens when I flip bomb-town?

TonyMontana · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:48 pm

Most likely, we get a draw.

TonyMontana · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:51 pm

That is if xvart is town.

GhostWriter · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:57 pm

So one day more if Xvart is scum, draw if not?

TonyMontana · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:09 pm

And win if xvart is scum, and you are scum bomb. Yay.

GhostWriter · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:43 am

Optimism is nice, I guess.

TonyMontana · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:06 am

Today's supposed to be deadline.
Hammer time, xvart

xvart · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:22 am

Anyone else?

xvart.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:12 am

Yeah, hammer, though TM bugs me at this point. There's an odd assumption we'd have a draw once xvart hammers as if he knows things.

Meh...I'm possibly overthinking.

Well, either way xvart, I think you're being paranoid but I really have no defense against meta suspicion. I mean, what am I going to say? I'm...not doing X? I mean, I'm not, but really, where does that get me? I don't think there's much I can say ^-^;.

xvart · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:44 pm

Yes, TM, how do you know how many lynches we have left?

xvart.

Chronopie · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:33 pm

Unanticipated V/LA...

Be back in a few days.

GhostWriter · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:35 pm

TM has had the assumption that we have 1 2-man mafia team all bloody day long, don't try pulling this crap. He even explained why. It makes sense. So him looking at things based on there being 2 living mafia isn't shocking in the least.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm

Actually, it's more the fact he seems to assume both you and xvart are town in that. He EBWOPs it rather fast, but that's even more interesting, actually.

TonyMontana · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:52 pm

I have been open with all my assumptions. Less FUD, more hammer.

TonyMontana · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:19 am

ITT: xvart waiting and hoping a deadline lynch will leave me as a technical hammer

UncertainKitten · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:26 am

How close are we to deadline? How long d'you think it'd take to swing the lynch to xvart? I think I'm still voting him...

TonyMontana · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:33 am

Well, that's the thing, deadline was technically yesterday, but jdodge haven't really stated anything, besides the rules saying 2 weeks.

@jdodge

, if you decide to drop by, i think it would be fair and square to extend the theoretical deadline. Maybe to something like "deadline is when xvart drops the hammer on GW"

I swing my vote if xvart posts again without hammering, with the continued desire that a bomb hammers the other bomb.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:35 am

Ugh, wish I had known that. I would have been more proactive about xvart lynch then.

TonyMontana · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:47 am

Ok, this is a disaster, xvart is already voting GW ¬¬