Newbie 1012 - Game over

[Excedrin]

Vote Count

raymondkurayami (3): nameloc1986, Rockerboo, bhavitgoyal
andrew94 (1): silverbullet999
bhavitgoyal (2): Dickov, Enigma
Dickov (1): Shadow Dancer
Rockerboo (1): andrew94

not voting: raymondkurayami
alive: 9 majority: 5

mod can u prod rockerboo

I prodded Rockerboo and raymondkurayami earlier today.

[raymondkurayami]

Hi guys, sorry for not posting for a while, I've had a ton of school work. School holidays starts today so I should be able to post a lot more.
Thanks for understanding.

[Shadow Dancer]

@andrew & silver: I have a proposition for you: Could the both of you each from his own POV describe what you are accusing the other one of and what you think you are accused of - not adressing each other but some imaginary totally uninvolved outsider who hasn't followed the game so far. I think that would help me as even well as each of you two to figure out what all this is really about.

@Dickov: Similar proposition to you - if you want to seriously defend yourself - start with piucking out one point that you feel accused of and concentrate on making a valid argument against that. I see us getting lost all over the place if we proceed in WOT style defenses.

[andrew94]

excuse me?
you are asking me to do all the donkey work?
are u kidding me?
simply highlight the bits that you dont understand and i will explain
i am NOT ur servant

[Shadow Dancer]

You have the best intgerest to represent the facts in an apropriate manner from you POV. I am just asking you to do waht you negligently negelcted so far. I have my own interpretation of what is going on. I want to verify or falsify it. You can represent your side of it or let it be. But right now the

best

impression I can get from your posts is that yo are

not helpful at all

. So you should better structure your thoughts in a way that displays some thread to prove that you're not only fluffing or trying to hide that you have nothing to say in your favor.

[andrew94]

alright silverbullet drew attention to the fact that raymond changed his suspects names.
i said ' maybe he has a lot of suspects'
silver replied with 'names dont change' which confuses me.
i then said he was making the case seem much bigger than it actually is - typical scum move to lynch someone
he then said it wasnt a case
so i said was he just poking his head in
he said yea
i said thats typical scum move so he wouldnt actually BE the person to cause the mislynch, just being in the shadows, poking in and out

i also stated that i dont care what nobody special did or did not do

[nameloc1986]

Hey y'all, I know I haven't posted in a few days, I've just been busy lately. I should post again tomorrow (Saturday), but I make no promises.

[Dickov]

Replace me please.

Thanks guys, it was fun while it lasted. I hope to have some time to play again in the future.

[Shadow Dancer]

@Dickov: Any specific reason

why

you replace out?

@andrew: See, that's exactly what I pointed out. silver never talked about "player names" or something like that he explicitely refered to the (one and clearly defined) player "name" which is short for "nameloc1986" obviously. That is why none of the both of you makes any sense to the other one - because you are talking about almost completely different things.
That you whole discussion is just bizar and puzzling to any one else in the game (or at least to me) is hardly worth mentioning under this premise.

Please,
please please, begin to read carefully and make sure that you actually understand what some one else is trying to tell you before you post a reply.

[silverbullet999]

Ya know... i posted a nice big wall of the case... but scum.net signed me off... and i lost everything... and I just don't give as much of a f***.

Andy's thought processes scare me... Me asking him questions is scummy.. because asking questions in general is scummy. He didn't like that I questioned nameloc (whether he is feigning ignorance now or not) because I was attacking without voting... which he said. I attacked him without voting until recently and he has no complaints?

Andy bumps to the top, I think he's an si just feigning vi now... or just a troll.

either way death to the heathen.

[andrew94]

explain about names bit shadow

[Shadow Dancer]

I did.
Twice.

[silverbullet999]

Yeah Andy's gonna be my numba one...

He's too much of a I....

[Dickov]

University started and I'm a fresher rep. Ah well.

[andrew94]

Yes they do, but apparently name's didn't.

dude this is what he said if he meant nameloc, it doesnt make sense
is it sarcastic or not. EXPLAIN AND STOP DODGING

[silverbullet999]

Andrew... I... I don't even know who you are referring to...

[andrew94]

dude U FUCK
MY PREVIOUS POST FIRST SENTENCE IS WHAT U SAID

THEN IM EXPLAINING MY PERSPECTION AND CONFUSION.
IF YOUR NOT GONNA EXPLAIN THEN IM DROPPING IT

[Shadow Dancer]

@andrew: Do us one favour, please: Calm down, reconsider, retry!

@silver: Do you wnna lynch andrew because he is a VI? What is your general opinion regarding policy lynches? What is you policy when it comes to determine D1 lynches?

[Enigma]

No comment on everything that has happened since my last post........

[Enigma]

Anyways I think rockerboo is due to be replaced. So might as well just wait for those 2 to be replaced before deciding how we want to proceed.

[bhavitgoyal]

Sorry for not posting for a while.

The thread has slowed down a lot and nothing interesting has happened during this periond

[silverbullet999]

-Enigma

No comment on everything that has happened since my last post........

Didn't you promise something.... like...

Now I actually want to comment on the andrew, silver, name discussion as well, but I will need to raincheck that until I have time.

and especially this...

We can see who ignored the case and hope it disappears, we can see how silver responds (which I will address very soon), we can see who is eager to try a new wagon because they wanted an excuse to get off another wagon etc etc.

I said it before.. I'll say it again... POLITICIAN promises... ARE NOT FAVORABLE

-Beta Wolf (Shadow Dancer)

Do you wnna lynch andrew because he is a VI? What is your general opinion regarding policy lynches? What is you policy when it comes to determine D1 lynches?

first question here's my quote which answers it

Andy bumps to the top, I think he's an si just feigning vi now... or just a troll.

either way death to the heathen.

Second question, depends on the policy and circumstances.
Third question, I don't have a specific policy when it comes to D1 lynches... except not to no-lynch.

[Shadow Dancer]

@silver: You avoid to answer my second question. Why? Under which circumstances precisely? Which policy do you mean? And how far are those conditions matched in this specific game?

[silverbullet999]

@silver: You avoid to answer my second question. Why? Under which circumstances precisely? Which policy do you mean? And how far are those conditions matched in this specific game?

Your first question... and then follow up questions... conflict with eachother. You wouldn't be able to ask those other questions if I avoided your question. Thus I refute that I have avoided your second question.
If the policy truly fits (the person has lied several times for instance or has been a huge distraction) I'd be for it, unless I think they are doing it because they are a pr or my gut says otherwise. I'm not sure if policy is fitting very strong here... I just feel that andy is feigning vi now in an attempt to undermine a bad argument from the get go.

[Excedrin]

I like it when vote counts end up at the top of the page.