The count is now fixed.Phoebus wrote:Vote count:
Illumina - 10 (JSexton, micigante, Lying Brian, Iammars, Fritzler, TonyMontana, TSAGod, zu_Faul, Blackberry, Nanook)
Jabroni2000 - 4 (PookyTheMagicalBear, StevieT92, Vesuvan, Yosarian2)
PookyTheMagicalBear - 1 (Flying Dutchman)
Flying Dutchman - 2 (BabyJesus, Monty)
Iammars - 1 (inHimshallibe)
LyingBrian - 1 (Gonzo)
NO LYNCH - 1 (Illumina)
13 Votes to lynch
Gonzo, thurrr is your reasons. Plus the fact that he;s not claiming despite being pressed.JSexton wrote:Figured you'd ask.Illumina wrote:Okay - care to elaborate on those?The most obvious. Why on earth would you consider this a good idea? Big tell.Illumina wrote:I'll go with a general no lynch vote for nowIf you're analyzing how solid your play is, you probably have something to hide. Townies don't. Fairly big tell.Illumina wrote:I was actually tempted to vote for Lying (would have saved me from being "suspicious" and been a solid move from a townsperson and mafia ...It seems pretty common for scum to cast vague suspicions on fellow scum without actually voting for them. It lets you have the best of both worlds. Small tell.Illumina wrote:I was tempted because his actions were a bit suspicious, but not enough to warrant a voteThat's awfully defensive. There was no pressure on you at that point. Medium tell.Illumina wrote:And because I needed to defend myself simply for not votingFishing. Small tell.Illumina wrote:is it even possible that the mafia could make three kills again this entire game?4 games? You don't get to play the n00b card anymore. Medium tell.Illumina wrote:Sorry for the noob mistake - I was aware of the special roles, but not the two mafia families variation. (I've played about 4 games before)
I know you've sort of dealt with the 'no lynch' thing, but I'm not really satisfied. There's only three reasons for a no lynch. One is a complex situation that certainly didn't apply here. The others are both scum tactics, one for new scum, one for experienced scum. I don't know which you are yet.
Anyway, every post you make smells wrong. Taken as a whole, I'm pretty confident that you're scum.
But the fact that you are 3 votes away from a lynch, no matter what there reasons, should give you a reason to claim, or at least defend agaisnt what arguements are out there. If you feel that the arguements are crap, tell us why. You'll might persuade us.Illumina wrote:The only problem with claiming is that it makes me a major target. That, and I don't think JSexton's arguments are valid to begin with. I'm still waiting for a response from him, as well as zu_Faul, to defend their arguments. Unless someone has a different reason than the ones JSexton listed, (which I feel I've debunked) I'd love to hear a tangible explanation for your vote. It seems like the majority of people holding onto their votes against me are doing so for flimsy reasons.
Yea, look above, I also said it was because you weren't claiming. Duh.Illumina wrote:The only problem with claiming is that it makes me a major target. That, and I don't think JSexton's arguments are valid to begin with. I'm still waiting for a response from him, as well as zu_Faul, to defend their arguments. Unless someone has a different reason than the ones JSexton listed, (which I feel I've debunked) I'd love to hear a tangible explanation for your vote. It seems like the majority of people holding onto their votes against me are doing so for flimsy reasons.
