Mini 1041: Wheel of Fortune Mafia (Game over!)

[FakeGod]

Thanks to his gambit, now I know that 1) Charlie has been shot by the mafia, 2) Charlie has shot ckd last night, and 3) I am the one-shot sane doctor.

And lastly, I didn't choose to save anyone yesterday, and still have my one-shot protection left in my arsenal.

The last note should not be touched by anyone, due to it's massive WIFOM-ness that is better on our side as it is. The first three points I find to be extrapolations. How do you know that Charlie used his kill and we don't have an SK out there, that targeted Charlie, and Mafia targeted CKD? I'm not saying that it's not a good guess on your part with good info, what I am noting is that you shouldn't be saying "Know".

I'd buy brianj mason as well. Rereading with the new info.

Sorry. Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "know", but from my point of view, it's the most likely scenario.

[Tazaro]

Vote: Pieman

He still IS scum =_=

Vote: Pieman

He could be

[Tasky]

VOTE: yabbaguy

[yabbaguy]

VOTE: yabbaguy

Reasons required. Not requested, required.

(More later.)

[Tasky]

VOTE: yabbaguy

Reasons required. Not requested, required.

(More later.)

lol

[Tasky]

Okay, I shall claim also. I am

Pat Sajak

(mason) and CKD was my mason partner. We know each other to be innocent. My breadcrumb can be read by checking first letter of my odd number posts backwards, except the very last one but I immediately posted right after that I "made a mistake" on the last post anyway.

Urgh, first time being a mason so the fact I had quicktopic slipped from my mind. Apologies to CKD for that, and I'll check the thread for reads. Somewhat busy with my university studies.

since (I assume) you have the same PM as CKD, could you please explain the buzz CKD was making about that town/townie/pro-town wording thing?
that would be helpful

[yabbaguy]

Actually, I have the time now. Thought I was headed to an appointment today for whatever reason. >_<

Scum suspects:

Tazaro- for using "skimming textwalls" as a reason to not scumhunt, seeing as even the bare-bones level of skimming isn't present. Votes have also come with consistently crummy reasoning.

Here's how to scumhunt: Wagon on Tasky for scummy unjustified vote!
Vote: Tasky

What vote are you mentioning here? Xite vote was obviously explained, and while the Pie vote wasn't explained

when

he voted, his points after the fact were adequate explanations.

ISO-12 was an unvote, which calls into question how seriously he's actually taking this vote.

why do I feel like that theory box is a blatant lie?

Theory box is obv credible.

Vote: Xite

How is this Town motivated?

Here, Tazaro also baselessly calls Tasky Town. I consider it a scumtell when a player calls another person Town for speculative/unjustified reasoning because it strikes me more as information gleamed from being the informed minority. It's speculative, and I know I've been wrong countless times before, but that's where I'm headed with this.

My thinking is that if it's credible, then a person (Xite) who attacks said credible thing consequently loses town cred.

The thing is, it's not

very, very likely

to be true, just that your opinion perceives a "box" as not only true, but also magically confirms Tasky. It's a poor attack, and while I realize you have the right to change your mind, the fact of the matter is that your best attack was one that was contrived and helped a wagon along. Those two qualities are scum qualities to me.

Pieman is a bit of a suspicious person who is slinking through the game without having a vote on someone.
Pieman, please vote.

Vote: Pieman

Also inaccurate.

---

Reckamonic- maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't see why A) they went after what were very likely confirmed Mason-class roles and B) they asked for the Mason claim. Willing to change my mind if the strategy can be explained.

Vote: Tazaro

VOTE: yabbaguy

Reasons required. Not requested, required.

(More later.)

lol

Code: Select all

*--------------------*
| YOU ARE ENTERING A |
|     POSTED NO      | 
|   BULLSHIT ZONE    |
*--------------------*
          ||

[Tasky]

Code: Select all

*--------------------*
| YOU ARE ENTERING A |
|     POSTED NO      | 
|   BULLSHIT ZONE    |
*--------------------*
          ||

this is so cool... do you mind if I copy it sometimes?

[StrangerCoug]

VOTE COUNT

Tazaro (1): yabbaguy
PieMan (2): Reckamonic, Tazaro
yabbaguy (1): Tasky
Not voting (5): brianj, FakeGod, Oman, PieMan, Prof. Guppy

With

9

players alive, it takes

5

votes to lynch.

[Prof. Guppy]

VOTE: Pieman

After reviewing the thread, I realized he's making posts without information.

@Tasky, quit stalling and tell us why you voted yabbaguy already.

[PieMan]

@Fakegod I would say your analysis is the most possible way things played out, unless we have a vig, who was stupid, I dont see much of any other way.

@tazaro I have to agree with Yabba, you have seemed oddly scummy, and now somehow you see me as mafia again, though I dont know of much that has really changed, since then, except for the death of xite.

VOTE: Tazaro

[brianj]

@Tasky
Easy- since we are mason, it would be crazy for there to be another town pair that is confirms each other. In my PM it states that "you know each other to be innocent". Thus if there was another role that knew each other, it would have been likelier for the mod to use same choice of wording such as "your partner is innocent" instead of "your partner is also confirmed town/townie etc.". CKD was checking whether FakeGod/Charlie was fakeclaiming or not by addressing this point; if they replied yeah my PM said my partner was "town" then the chance of them fakeclaiming would increase dramastically.

I buy FakeGod's claim. Charlie saying "brianj will be my target if I had vig powers" (or something like that) in previous posts actually make sense considering this information, and looking at his role and what Charlie said day one FakeGod explanation fits otherwise I don't see why Charlie would firmly believe his partner was town.

VOTE: Prof. Guppy
Also didn't say much anything notable, his stance toward Xite91 on post #11 feels off to me. Do you happen to have any other suspects besides PieMan?

[FakeGod]

This is why having 2 mason-ish groups in a mini causes problems.

[Tasky]

@Tasky, quit stalling and tell us why you voted yabbaguy already.

I voted yabbaguy for fun. ok?
and now for fun I am going to vote you:
UNVOTE: VOTE: Prof. Guppy

[Tasky]

@Tasky
Easy- since we are mason, it would be crazy for there to be another town pair that is confirms each other. In my PM it states that "you know each other to be innocent". Thus if there was another role that knew each other, it would have been likelier for the mod to use same choice of wording such as "your partner is innocent" instead of "your partner is also confirmed town/townie etc.". CKD was checking whether FakeGod/Charlie was fakeclaiming or not by addressing this point; if they replied yeah my PM said my partner was "town" then the chance of them fakeclaiming would increase dramastically.

ok, thx... this makes it clear

[Oman]

Tasky still annoys the shit out of me. Pieman idea is growing on me, I think it may be the way he doesn't acknowledge the wagon on him.

[Tazaro]

Man, the vibes I'm getting from Professor Guppy; he inexplicably pings my scumdar...
[b}Unvote[/b]

Vote: Professor Guppy

[Tazaro]

Oops, ebwop:
blah blah blah

Unvote

VOTE: Professor Guppy

[yabbaguy]

Tazaro, reply to 331 please.

[Tazaro]

I voted for Tasky BEFORE his points after the fact. What was inaccurate? I voted for Pieman when he wasn't voting, and he seems to not know what he's doing as much as others.

[Prof. Guppy]

@Tasky, quit stalling and tell us why you voted yabbaguy already.

I voted yabbaguy for fun. ok?
and now for fun I am going to vote you:
UNVOTE: VOTE: Prof. Guppy

Okay, newbie, clearly I need to explain to you how voting works.

You vote for people who you think are mafia. Then you explain to us why they are mafia, in your opinion. That way, you can convince other people to vote for them as well, so that they can be lynched. Understood?

Now, if you can give me a valid argument for why I am scum, I will try to refute it, to prove to you that I am in fact town. If you cannot give such an argument, you have no reason to be voting for me when you could be voting for scum.

[Tasky]

xD. I know how to play this game.
But I also want to have fun.
and I am scumhunting, I don't have a top suspect right now, wanna see what happens.
but my vote on you is fine for now.

[FakeGod]

Keep in mind that xite's last foses were

CKD

, yabbaguy, and guppy.

[FakeGod]

If I had to choose between yabba and guppy at this point, I would say guppy.

Vote: Prof. Guppy

[StrangerCoug]

Fixed some typos in rules 6 and 8.