look into my eyes and tell me why you wish a massclaim
LIE TO ME
have i not posted content?gandalf5166 wrote:Who? AGM has made many accusations.BV hasn't but he's also only posted twice.CSL is scummy, but he's at least posted content.Espeo has made some mild accusations. Exilon has even managed to make some mild accusations in his 3 posts. VV has accused you, if not given reasons. Whereas the only scumhunting you have done at all was in your first post, and it was BAD scumhunting at that, as well as sheeping.
only posts a few times, set up spectulation , and just points at some stuff and thats called 'have suspicsions?;'Exilon wrote:In a game with no guaranteed sanities and powerless mafia, and because there IS NO SANITY REVEAL UPON DEATH, a no-lynch is statistically better for town (Applying to Day 1 principles) and allows the person that wasn't lynched to try his action, giving town more leeway to figure out their sanities, and specially what sanities do not coincide (therefore scum).
I think that's the gist of it, feel free to dissect it. It's just somewthing that came to me a while ago and that I thought could be a good idea with proper discussion.
thats what i fucking said u blind fuck.CSL wrote:BS, andrew.
gandalf was already voting you when the L-2 count came. He merely unvoted you, voted the mod, then voted you.
Stop twisting my words.