Mars 2/Mini 243 - We Didn't Start the Fire, Game Over

[BabyJesus]

ill go with it

vote: bj

do you know who your partner is?

you are not being helpful....

unvote

meanwhile....

Bloojay, do you know your partner??

[Iammars]

Page 11 Vote Count:

BJ- 3 (bloojay, raj, stark)
bloojay- 2 (LB, Nai)
LB- 1 (Tamuz)
raj- 1 (nanook)
stark- 1 (Cubs)

Not voting (2): BJ, TINM

6 to lynch.

I love being the mod

[BabyJesus]

vote LyingBrian

[BabyJesus]

I also think its better if my mason buddy stays hidden for now.....

[LyingBrian]

time to turn the pressure cooker back on!

unvote

vote: BabyJesus

i have more propensity to believe bloojay right now than you BabyJesus! also, what is your reason for your vote on me, BabyJesus?

Hmm, wow

Major FOS: LyingBrian, voting for somebody because they have voted for somebody who you were voting for the post before is blatently hypocritical. It seems like you may be trying to start an easy bandwagon for bad reasons.

we haven't played together at all unless you're in the civil war. basically, the vote for bloojay was almost random. i wanted to start some discussion and get reactions, and decided a tongue-in-cheek vote was the way to go.

I'm happy with my vote eespecially with the latestcirumstances, and that LB's only response to my earlier accusation made no sense at all to me. The situations really aren't different as the game's situations are the same and no hard evidence is there on either hand... so exact same situation with different names.

If I could double vote, I would triple vote LB

if you can start a bandwagon and get me to 5 votes, then i'll explain the numerous differences between the two situations, but w/ 2 votes, i'm just too lazy to do the work.

[BabyJesus]

time to turn the pressure cooker back on!

unvote

vote: BabyJesus

i have more propensity to believe bloojay right now than you BabyJesus!

awwww..... I guess you smart folk got me.

[BabyJesus]

Are you sure enough of your information that you are willing to be lynched next if/when I am proved to be truthful....

Uh, yeah. Pretty much. Didn't I already say that? If I didn't, I meant to.

wow....ok, guess its time to lynch me then....

wish I could be around to see him squirm tomorrow.....

let me bump this, so we know not to let bloojay off the hook tomorrow...

[BabyJesus]

ill go with it

vote: bj

do you know who your partner is?

you are not being helpful....

unvote

meanwhile....

Bloojay, do you know your partner??

still waiting for bloojay to tell us if he knows his partner....or even to tell us HIS rolename, for that matter.

Considering we have a bunch of sheep voting me based on his BS with no info, whereas I have given a ton of info, I think we need more.....

I'm pretty sure stark is scum at this point though, not 100% sure on LB.

unvote, vote stark

, but I honestly think running up either one would be beneficial.

[stark]

want to tell me why?

[bloojay]

Bloojay, do you know your partner??

Yeah, both of 'em.

[Nai]

That clinches it for me right there. Because I can save someone from being run up right now, I'll claim.

i was holding out, but I want to make it clear that BJ is telling the truth. I'm Rock and Roller Cola Wars. I'm told that I know that a friend of mine Punk Rock (BJ) is town. I don't consider us masons, as we can not talk outside of game. BJ coming out with exact names is what caused me not to vote for him.

I think that Bloojay either needs to die hard (as he said, two mason groups? Besides, a three mason group sounds waaay too close to a scum group, don'tcha think?) for his claim.

[bloojay]

I think that Bloojay either needs to die hard (as he said, two mason groups? Besides, a three mason group sounds waaay too close to a scum group, don'tcha think?) for his claim.

Well, that cinches it then. If we kill BJ and i'm right (and I am quite a bit more than fairly sure now that I am) then we know exactly who to go for the next day. I guess its all up to you guys now. But If you guys kill me....that's 2 wrong choices for lynching and no right ones. Oops.

[BabyJesus]

I think that Bloojay either needs to die hard (as he said, two mason groups? Besides, a three mason group sounds waaay too close to a scum group, don'tcha think?) for his claim.

Well, that cinches it then. If we kill BJ and i'm right (and I am quite a bit more than fairly sure now that I am) then we know exactly who to go for the next day. I guess its all up to you guys now. But If you guys kill me....that's 2 wrong choices for lynching and no right ones. Oops.

we're not lynching me today, guy.

[BabyJesus]

Bloojay, did your pm say you KNOW your mason buddies are innocent? I was a mini (weather mafia) with a 3 mason group where one of my mason buddies there was not....

[BabyJesus]

That clinches it for me right there. Because I can save someone from being run up right now, I'll claim.

i was holding out, but I want to make it clear that BJ is telling the truth. I'm Rock and Roller Cola Wars. I'm told that I know that a friend of mine Punk Rock (BJ) is town. I don't consider us masons, as we can not talk outside of game. BJ coming out with exact names is what caused me not to vote for him.

I think that Bloojay either needs to die hard (as he said, two mason groups? Besides, a three mason group sounds waaay too close to a scum group, don'tcha think?) for his claim.

why did you say this then.....

If he doesn't know his mason partner, it's pretty much a BS claim. There's no point of a mason that doesn't know his partner. If you don't know the partner, you can't communicate at night. And if you can't do that, you're nothing but a townie that has a spiffy title.

I say we lynch him.

[stark]

i find it a little odd that nai knows your innocent, but you dont know he is. two mason groups seems also very much. what is your role bloojay?

[BabyJesus]

i find it a little odd that nai knows your innocent, but you dont know he is. two mason groups seems also very much. what is your role bloojay?

I don't think Nai knew I was innocent till I outed my role....

[stark]

alright. would a mass claim be not so good for us?

[Tamuz]

I'm happy with my vote eespecially with the latestcirumstances, and that LB's only response to my earlier accusation made no sense at all to me. The situations really aren't different as the game's situations are the same and no hard evidence is there on either hand... so exact same situation with different names.

If I could double vote, I would triple vote LB

if you can start a bandwagon and get me to 5 votes, then i'll explain the numerous differences between the two situations, but w/ 2 votes, i'm just too lazy to do the work.

Read, I'm really not going to expound because it will bring up interesting questions that will bring suspicions upon me.

Does nobody else see this, in all seriousness?

[LyingBrian]

I'm happy with my vote eespecially with the latestcirumstances, and that LB's only response to my earlier accusation made no sense at all to me. The situations really aren't different as the game's situations are the same and no hard evidence is there on either hand... so exact same situation with different names.

If I could double vote, I would triple vote LB

if you can start a bandwagon and get me to 5 votes, then i'll explain the numerous differences between the two situations, but w/ 2 votes, i'm just too lazy to do the work.

Read, I'm really not going to expound because it will bring up interesting questions that will bring suspicions upon me.

Does nobody else see this, in all seriousness?

one difference between Nai's request for information & mine was that Nai was asking EVERYBODY if their role name matched their role. i was asking BabyJesus what his role name was AFTER he claimed his role.

Satisfied?

[Tamuz]

And your attacks? (aka your voting)
That is more what I was focused on rather than your request for information. Which brings up another thing; false representation. You lie to advance your case. You say there are numerous things, yet you only say one and expect me to be happy with that. Pah

And another thing to notice ladies and gentlemen, Bryan has said multiple times that he is new at this, which seems to me to be a way of trying to break hiimself away from responsability.

[Nai]

I did NOT know BJ was innocent until he gave his role name and my role name in his claim. All I knew before that was that he was claiming mason. My role did NOT tell me that BJ was innocent. It told me that the role Punk Rock was innocent.

[BabyJesus]

I did NOT know BJ was innocent until he gave his role name and my role name in his claim. All I knew before that was that he was claiming mason. My role did NOT tell me that BJ was innocent. It told me that the role Punk Rock was innocent.

so nothing triggered for you when I just happened to be claiming a "mason" who also didn't know his partner....

[BabyJesus]

Seriously though, LB and stark are scum. Can we focus on them please? If no one disputes Nai he is confirmed as my mason buddy....

[BabyJesus]

Bloojay, did your pm say you KNOW your mason buddies are innocent? I was a mini (weather mafia) with a 3 mason group where one of my mason buddies there was not....

bump for bloojay..... my role pm specifically said I knew my mason buddy was innocent. Did yours?