I have reread Tazaro in ISO. All references are ISO of Tazaro. Here is my case on him.
(A) Post 13 he states he can
Guarantee
that scum is on the TASKY wagon. Well, the only players who can guarantee any alignment are mafia. He could only know one is on, if he is partners with them. Related, to this post is 14. It is an EBWOP. I do not like this phrase he uses, " Either way you look at it". This is said with conviction. Again, as though he really knows. And, you better listen to him.
But, does he explain any reason for this knowledge? NO.
It is a scumtell to have unreasoned confidence. He deliberately wants to protect TASKY, without stated cause. That is highly indicative of secret connection unknown to town.
(B) Post 7 He loves being scum so he can be devious. He describes what should be expected from HIM as "town", and as "scum". But, in post 23 and 24 he dismisses the standarded he set up by stating: he is bad at playing and he is a "calmer". He set up his explanation within this game by his answers in post 7. So, for him to have a change in heart when
under scrutiny
is very convenient. He is denying that he is following the pattern about his play that he gave us.
Every time a player claims, to be a bad player as a defense, it is scummy. Every time, I have seen it used, it really means that they are bad at "acting town". So, he has played his scum role poorly, and now he knows he is in jeopardy and he has jeopardized TASKY too. Two mafia players caught early in the game.
(C) In post 24 he states he is not jumping to every scumtell he perceives. This is more likely due to the fact he is not really "looking" for scumtells, than to due to being a "calm town" player. He was not "calm" when I voted for TASKY. In fact he was furious. He said:
"
Either way you look at it
, SOW either played a crummy vote on Tasky due to being scum or needs to be pressured to take it off of Tasky". That is not calm. He wants me to be pressured to UNVOTE. Not pressured to slip up in scumminess. No, that is not his focus. He wants me to UNVOTE. Why? Because he is frantic to save TASKY. He did not complain about anyone else voting for him. Just me. Why? Likely because my reason for voting struck at him. It was not RV, like others.
(D) He is looking for a place to appear "reasonable". He just does not want to draw too much attention to himself. He has not justified his vote on me. His only reason was:
Tazaro wrote:*Regaining my most prolific poster title.*
jimfinn wrote:What do you mean by Vague neutrality? Also, why is SoW's vote so terrible? It seems like a "you're not doing what we want so i vote you" type vote, which could feasibly be used by a town player trying to push a specific strategy.
SOW's vote IS terrible. In fact, he's my scumpick. Either way you look at it, SOW either played a crummy vote on Tasky due to being scum or
needs to be pressured to take it off of Tasky
. I for one see scumminess as a very viable possibility.
Shepherd of Wolves
Read that again, and again. Either I was A or B. I was scum, or I was needing pressure to UNVOTE.
Ridiculous! Why do I need to be pressured to UNVOTE Tasky? Why does that have anything to do with me being scummy. He makes no real case or explanation why my vote even hinted at being scummy. His primary focus was to pressure me to UNVOTE.
(E) Why does Tazaro attack my vote on TASKY as terrible? Why does he still vote me? He has no reason to be voting for me. He has not stated any reason. So, I fulfilled his desire to UNVOTE. But, he is just trying to appear "reasonable". He does not feel the need to explain his vote. In fact, he is not even trying to recruit votes onto me. Why not? It is because he is scum, only trying to appear "reasonable". He is not jumping on to ANY scumtell. He cannot find a case. That is because he is attempting to frame someone, not hunt them.
(F) He mentions or refers to TASKY in posts 12, 13, 14, 15, & 17. That represents 20% of his 24 total posts. Why the hyper-focus? Defending him. Protecting him. Accommodating him. Never questioning him.
(G) If there is a TASKY connection (which I know there is) the next thing to do is see how much attention TASKY gives TAZARO.
TASKY ISO
Tasky mentions TAZARO in posts 1, 2, 5, 10, & 11. This represents 50% of his posts. All of them Defending, supporting, and never questioning Taz.
(H) Who are the 2 people voting me. Together, no it can't be. It is TASKY and TAZARO. What a team!
(I) TASKY's first post to vote, he straight out tells the truth. TAZARO is SCUM. Tasky knows, and is attempting to "separate" himself.