Cheers, I take this as a compliment from both of you.Memnon wrote: agree with this. UNVOTE:
It is not unusual, but I would suggest that anybody using the fact it is not unusual as a justification is on a slippery slope to scum. It is certainly bad to throw out an L-1 or a hammer without justification (not that you did that just putting my tuppence worth in).Votes jumping around early isn't an unusual thing unless you put someone at L-1 or hammer without reasoning. (IC or SE's feel free to correct me on this or disagree)
Really me boring?someone clearly doesnt know what they are talking about wrote:(boberz is) succeeding to bore town
someone who is incorrect wrote:He pushes one attack on memnon, and nothing else. No wait, he pushes something else. He tells everyone to bandwagon. Now bandwagonning gets someone lynched, correct
Seriously Pizza. You put this in quotation marks. Why? DId I say it? Since I didnt say it, why did you put the words into my mout and then vote for me using your logic. Madness madness madness. If you werent town I would have you strung up.someone who is misrepping wrote:"If everyone else finds him scum, then he must be scum!".
Appealing to the majority is not bandwagoning, it seriously isn't. Just lose 'appealing to majority from your vocabulary it doesnt work anyway (unless you know how to use it very few people do (I dont))And if voting someone because they have the most votes on them isn't appeal to majority, then what is?
THe answer is loads.Thanks, Equinox. But I guess what I was getting at with that question was, what other good methods are there for stimulating discussion?
How did this help us catch scum?Thank you, skn, for taking a stand. I want to see where this line of attack goes.
@Substrike: what's your reasoning behind that vote?
@Ragnarokio: who are your top two suspects?
This is the epitomy of poor play and where in my read I realised you were todays lynch. It truly does betray how eager you are for a lynch. It is throwing mud but without proper reasoning. Unless you really think a newb becomming inactive is really a scumtell.I find it interesting that ManInTrenchcoat has flaked once pressure has come upon him.
THere are other ways to start a day btw. It isnt a straight choice. I hate RVS had I been in the game at the time there would not ave been one (this si completely off topic.)For being too lazy to start a RQS. Actually, it's good that you're not pretending to be like Neto
Incorrect. I am not voting you.boberz wrote:Equinox, you made an assumption about what I wanted to do then voted me for it. Assumption wrong.
There is no time to get more data. Besides, with 12+ pages of content, I think we have enough data with which to work. The problem is lack of unity in the town... which, admittedly, is partially my fault since I haven't been around to help facilitate that.KoreanWonderBoy wrote:Like everyone else is saying, we need MORE data than just ways of people talking, because newbish talk and scummy talk is so similar. And this is a Newbie game. So I'm not changing my vote.
So, in other words, you're accusing yourself of being scum?boberz wrote:Okay most importantly on the subject of Memnon's tops supect flaking and his consequential grumblings and refusual to playings. It is bad because Memnon on atleast one occasion suggested he wanted to wait for the replacement and the inference was that he lacked either the will or the ability to scumhunt further. It is plain for all to see that he has the ability to articulate a case along with the best players in the game so the question is why did he lack the will. I understand that it is dissapointing when your highest suspect flakes, but waving it around as a flag, an excuse or a delaying tactic is not good.
This suggests to me that you were targetting one suspect in such a way that it was your only focus which imo betrays a scummy mentality.
Loads, unfortunately, is not a good method for stimulating discussion. You have to be more specific. And I asked the question because the game was stagnating and I didn't know what to do about it.boberz wrote:THe answer is loads.Thanks, Equinox. But I guess what I was getting at with that question was, what other good methods are there for stimulating discussion?
But more to the point why ask the question?
Right then and there, it didn't help catch scum. Later on though, the benefit of having statements from people to draw on is overwhelmingly helpful. So are you suggesting that asking people questions is anti-town, or at the very least, unhelpful to town?boberz wrote:How did this help us catch scum?Thank you, skn, for taking a stand. I want to see where this line of attack goes.
@Substrike: what's your reasoning behind that vote?
@Ragnarokio: who are your top two suspects?
What text? That was exactly the problem. You can't dissect something that isn't there.boberz wrote:Essentially my point is that if people read you in iso they will see the first page which is full of questions that go nowhere hints of suspicions guised in those questions and little proper scum hunting, No dissecting of text.
A newb becoming inactive is not a scumtell. You're right. But that's a really narrow-minded statement. Do we just write him off as a newb? And we have to ask, did he become inactive because he was under pressure? There's so much more you have to consider.boberz wrote:This is the epitomy of poor play and where in my read I realised you were todays lynch. It truly does betray how eager you are for a lynch. It is throwing mud but without proper reasoning. Unless you really think a newb becomming inactive is really a scumtell.I find it interesting that ManInTrenchcoat has flaked once pressure has come upon him.
Gut. Why, are you suggesting my reasons were not real?boberz wrote:Also what was your real reasoning behind substrike???
)