Mars 2/Mini 243 - We Didn't Start the Fire, Game Over

[LyingBrian]

FOS: BabyJesus

i've been working on a new system for keeping track of posts, votes, etc., so i didn't have a post count until just a few minutes ago. anyway, BabyJesus has twice as many posts as anybody else. the reason i am pointing at him is b/c the last game i played where one player had significantly more posts than any other, that person was scum, and the reason he was posting so much, was b/c he was controlling the flow of the conversation. not necessarily scummy in and of itself, BabyJesus, but

IGMEOY

Odd....I'm pretty sure this isn't your first game with me. Any reason I get an FOS here, and not elsewhere??

4 of my games have/had you in them, and you are the post leader in all of them, yet this is the only game where your post count is double the closest person to you.

But a little information goes a long way.

especially if you're scum!

[stark]

vote: BJ

[BabyJesus]

FOS: BabyJesus

i've been working on a new system for keeping track of posts, votes, etc., so i didn't have a post count until just a few minutes ago. anyway, BabyJesus has twice as many posts as anybody else. the reason i am pointing at him is b/c the last game i played where one player had significantly more posts than any other, that person was scum, and the reason he was posting so much, was b/c he was controlling the flow of the conversation. not necessarily scummy in and of itself, BabyJesus, but

IGMEOY

Odd....I'm pretty sure this isn't your first game with me. Any reason I get an FOS here, and not elsewhere??

4 of my games have/had you in them, and you are the post leader in all of them, yet this is the only game where your post count is double the closest person to you.

Are my post that much higher, or are others posts that much lower here....

[BabyJesus]

vote: BJ

any reason, or just a bandwagon hop...

[stark]

i am firmly against trigger happiness. at this point, i understand your reasoning with lynching those who claim townie, considering that scum generaly are not that creative. however, with such a diverse range of role choices, im sure that they can make up something. i also believe that there might be more vanillas, which, if we go by your method, will result in repetitive bad lynches for town. that explain it?

[BabyJesus]

i am firmly against trigger happiness. at this point, i understand your reasoning with lynching those who claim townie, considering that scum generaly are not that creative. however, with such a diverse range of role choices, im sure that they can make up something. i also believe that there might be more vanillas, which, if we go by your method, will result in repetitive bad lynches for town. that explain it?

pretty weak-ass reason to jump on a bandwagon day two, guy. Basically you're admitting you don;'t know or care if I'm scum, but you're voting me because I believe lynching a vanilla townie Day One is better then outing the doc. right.....

[BabyJesus]

Vote update would be nice....

[Nai]

Is it just me, BJ, or is the doc dead? Oh, wait, he is. That makes your argument null and void, doesn't it?

[BabyJesus]

Is it just me, BJ, or is the doc dead? Oh, wait, he is. That makes your argument null and void, doesn't it?

X

The doc wasn't dead Day ONE when I used that argument, smartass. I haven;t said anything about lynching a claimed townie automatically day two.

[Nai]

Yet you used that argument as an excuse against Stark's argument, which is valid. However, you've already decided on your target today. Yesterday you single-handedly started a bandwagon that got rid of a townie. Today, you've done the same thing, but it hasn't gone far enough. You're a decent candidate for lynch yourself, just as much as any of the rest of us.

[Tamuz]

cause i have 2 votes on me and someone asked if anyones ability has anything to do with their role,i have kinda....

I think this one needs a killing. No absolutely founded in text reasons, but he seems fishy for me, and a copier. And we all know people who copy are most likely scums trying to act like an innocent to use that as a sticking point of their innocence. *ehemm* apprentice *ehemm*

[LyingBrian]

Unofficial Vote Count

BabyJesus - 4 (bloojay, Nai, rajrhcpfreak, stark)
This is not me - 2 (BabyJesus, Tamuz)
Nai - 1 (LyingBrian)
rajrhcpfreak - 1 (NanookTheWolf)
stark - 1 (Cubsfan4ever)

Are my post that much higher, or are others posts that much lower here....

LOL, i like how you turn the argument back onto me BabyJesus, very nicely done! the fact that you are being so defensive concerning you post count, makes me wonder if my perception has struck a nerve.

what do you think about roleclaiming, now, BabyJesus, or would you like me to vote for you first?

[This is not me]

well at that case i can also say that tamuz is copier for runnign a mafia game,i am prety sure that you have copied the game idea from some other persons and well a lot of roles too,like cops and docs and stuff,anyway that is irrevelant.and well i dont think that my post is fishy,my role name is connected with me role,but not that directly.

[BabyJesus]

Yet you used that argument as an excuse against Stark's argument, which is valid. However, you've already decided on your target today. Yesterday you single-handedly started a bandwagon that got rid of a townie. Today, you've done the same thing, but it hasn't gone far enough. You're a decent candidate for lynch yourself, just as much as any of the rest of us.

so you know for a fact I am voting for a townie?? interesting....

[BabyJesus]

Unofficial Vote Count

BabyJesus - 4 (bloojay, Nai, rajrhcpfreak, stark)
This is not me - 2 (BabyJesus, Tamuz)
Nai - 1 (LyingBrian)
rajrhcpfreak - 1 (NanookTheWolf)
stark - 1 (Cubsfan4ever)

Are my post that much higher, or are others posts that much lower here....

LOL, i like how you turn the argument back onto me BabyJesus, very nicely done! the fact that you are being so defensive concerning you post count, makes me wonder if my perception has struck a nerve.

what do you think about roleclaiming, now, BabyJesus, or would you like me to vote for you first?

You think I care? Stop beating around the bush and fos'ing me for stupid reasons. You want to vote me, vote for me then, guy.

[LyingBrian]

You think I care? Stop beating around the bush and fos'ing me for stupid reasons. You want to vote me, vote for me then, guy.

i would random vote somebody Day 1 for stupid reasons, but i wouldn't FOS somebody for a stupid reason.

i believe it is a valid reason for a FOS, but your reaction after the FOS gives me a valid reason to vote for you.

Unvote: Nai

Vote: BabyJesus

I think we would like you to roleclaim, BabyJesus!

[Nai]

so you know for a fact I am voting for a townie?? interesting....

I never said you were voting for a townie. I said that "today you are doing the same thing", i.e. starting a bandwagon with no evidence whatsoever. Unless you have evidence? It seems to me like you really wanted a doc.

[BabyJesus]

You think I care? Stop beating around the bush and fos'ing me for stupid reasons. You want to vote me, vote for me then, guy.

i would random vote somebody Day 1 for stupid reasons, but i wouldn't FOS somebody for a stupid reason.

i believe it is a valid reason for a FOS, but your reaction after the FOS gives me a valid reason to vote for you.

Unvote: Nai

Vote: BabyJesus

I think we would like you to roleclaim, BabyJesus!

sure, I'm a mason. This should not be news. Commence the unvoting, tia!

[BabyJesus]

Oh, but sadly I don;t know who my mason buddy is...I just know I'm one.

:shrug:

[LyingBrian]

sure, I'm a mason. This should not be news.

i don't understand why this should not be news.

Oh, but sadly I don;t know who my mason buddy is...I just know I'm one.

this is one reason why i think i'll keep my vote on you for now. sounds like a BS claim, but i'm a newbie, so maybe somebody can explain to me the purpose of a mason who doesn't know who the other mason/s is/are?

and for the curiosity factor, what is your name?

[rajrhcpfreak]

i think the name part is the most important. i need to know that before i make my unvote.

[Nai]

If he doesn't know his mason partner, it's pretty much a BS claim. There's no point of a mason that doesn't know his partner. If you don't know the partner, you can't communicate at night. And if you can't do that, you're nothing but a townie that has a spiffy title.

I say we lynch him.

[rajrhcpfreak]

it depends on his name... maybe him not knowing his partner is part of the flavor of his role...

[LyingBrian]

it depends on his name... maybe him not knowing his partner is part of the flavor of his role...

what makes him useful then? with this argument at best, he is a "townie that has a spiffy title" (thanks Nai), at worst, he is scum who came up with a crappy & BS roleclaim.

according to BabyJesus' Day 1 logic, he would be a safe lynch. i'm not saying we should lynch him just yet, i think we need more discussion, but at the same time, i don't think we should turn the pressure off either.

[stark]

i concur that BJ's claim is far fetched. do you know the role name of your partner, so we can get some verification? tell me though, if you dont know the name or rolename of your partner, whats the point of being a masoN?