Open 242 - Friends and Enemies Mafia (Over!)

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:24 am

gandalf5166 wrote:Zwet, YOU'RE FUCKING STUPID. Confirmed townies + LyLo = town-win almost guaranteed. You kill them off immediately.

Not if you can prevent them from confirming themselves (which would only happen if one of them died).

gandalf5166 · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:31 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:Zwet, YOU'RE FUCKING STUPID. Confirmed townies + LyLo = town-win almost guaranteed. You kill them off immediately.
Not if you can prevent them from confirming themselves (which would only happen if one of them died).

No, we were confirmed as soon as we claimed. Now die scumz.

Socrates · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:31 am

OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT:

Molestargazer (2) - Jahudo, Smashbro_of_the_SSS
Zwet (2) - gandalf, molestargazer
Haylen (1) - afatchic

Not Voting: Battle Mage, JordanA24, Haylen, zwet,

With 9 alive it is 5 to lynch.

afatchic has not picked up his prod. I will give him another 24 hours and then I shall replace him.

Jahudo · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:46 am

Someone would still have to counter-claim at some point. You would never lynch an uncounter-claimed power role in an open setup. So the best the scum could hope for is to look more pro-town late in the game. Which I guess is possible, but probably wouldn't work in most games. I would never expect 2 scum to claim masons that early, or 2 masons to avoid countering when you could trade 2 for 2. That just seems like bad play all around.

zwet, why aren't you voting right now?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:51 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:Zwet, YOU'RE FUCKING STUPID. Confirmed townies + LyLo = town-win almost guaranteed. You kill them off immediately.
Not if you can prevent them from confirming themselves (which would only happen if one of them died).
No, we were confirmed as soon as we claimed. Now die scumz.

disregard everything I've said about masons and confirmed town. I only just realized that this was an open game. *ridiculously embarrassed*

gandalf5166 · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:55 am

WTF LOL.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:56 am

epic fail by zwet

gandalf5166 · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:56 am

But honestly, that is the funniest thing I have read in all my time on MS.

Jahudo · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:13 am

Ugh, I said it was an open setup yesterday.

Jahudo wrote:Gandalf was at L-1 with mole's vote actually. And for future reference I think gandalf should have been the one to claim, since a counter-claim would have been unlikely and at least the third mason could stay hidden for a little while.
Since we know this is an open setup with verifiable power roles
, there should not have been any worry over a quicklynch.

I take it you aren't reading me that close?

gandalf5166 · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:17 am

Jahudo, he clearly isn't reading the thread very closely at all. That's why I haven't moved my vote, even though his behaviour yesterday is semi-explained.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:27 am

Jesus. Well, Haylen is scum.

Haylen · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:14 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:Jesus. Well, Haylen is scum.

Why am I scum?

afatchic · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:27 pm

Sorry, i guess i should have mentioned that i will have limited access over the weekends, as the only chance i have to get on is on campus before class. Then i didn't have class thursday, so it turned in to a 4 day weekend basically. Anyways, catching up now... we post later this evening

Battle Mage · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:40 pm

Vote: Zwet

Guess we have to now.

BM

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:00 pm

Unvote; Vote: zwet

Jahudo · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:15 pm

If you wanted to be the hammer, you're one vote off.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:18 pm

GOD DAMN IT!

Unvote; Vote: Battle Mage

.

Battle Mage · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:30 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:Zwet, YOU'RE FUCKING STUPID. Confirmed townies + LyLo = town-win almost guaranteed. You kill them off immediately.
Not if you can prevent them from confirming themselves (which would only happen if one of them died).
No, we were confirmed as soon as we claimed. Now die scumz.
disregard everything I've said about masons and confirmed town. I only just realized that this was an open game. *ridiculously embarrassed*

Until this post, i wouldve staked my life on you being town. Now you've basically turned everything on it's head. The best thing is, if you are scum, it will be seriously easy to find your last buddy.

In fact, i'm gonna do that now!

BM

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:31 pm

someone vote me so I can hammer. and lynch BM tomorrow while you're at it!

Haylen · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:34 pm

See Zwet, the main reason I haven't voted for you today was the CSL told everybody to and no offense to him, but he's often wrong. However, considering I didn't like your play yesterday as I mentioned and the fact that you just selfvoted has changed my mind on my stance on that.

Unvote Vote Zwet

Haylen · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:35 pm

Im calling your bluff.

Haylen · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:37 pm

Btw. Your previous post said that you thought I'm scum, then you tell us to lynch BM tomorrow.

I'm seeing a big inconsistancy with your thoughts and what you say.

Battle Mage · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:37 pm

Liking Jahudo as town now. Virtually confirmed town if Zwet is scum.

Obvious lynch tomorrow if Zwet flips scum, is Afatchic. But i could see Molestargazer as a buddy.

Edit: Same with Haylen now.

Edit2: Stop fking preventing me from posting. lmao

BM

Haylen · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:39 pm

No! Lol.

I meant to say an inconsistancy with his vote and his beliefs, along with the fact he's explained nothing.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:42 pm

Unvote; Vote: zwet

Yay!